Technical Papers
Feb 28, 2019

Multihazard Design and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Buildings with Special Moment–Resisting Steel Frames

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 5

Abstract

This study evaluates the economic viability of allowing for controlled inelastic deformation of special moment–resisting buildings during wind storms. This is achieved through a set of case studies involving steel buildings of varying heights made of special moment–resisting frames located in three different cities in the United States, with different intensity levels of wind and seismic hazards. The evaluation procedure utilizes the latest developments in the field of performance-based earthquake engineering but in a multihazard context. By comparing the capital costs of the buildings with the expected life-cycle losses, it is shown that controlled inelastic deformation of buildings under wind load may be economically advantageous, depending upon the properties of the structures and characteristics of both hazards. It is also shown that, irrespective of whether a building is designed following the current code provisions or allowing for controlled inelastic deformation under wind excitations in seismically active regions, neglecting one hazard during performance-based cost-benefit analysis of the building can result in very large errors in the predicted life-cycle losses.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation through Award No. CMMI-1235327.

References

AISC. 2010a. Prequalified connections for special and intermediate moment frames for seismic applications. ANSI/AISC 358. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2010b. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341. Chicago: AISC.
Al-Shawwa, N., and D. G. Lignos. 2013. “Web-based interactive tools for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Accessed September 1, 2017. http://resslabtools.epfl.ch.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Beck, J. L., K. Porter, and R. V. Shaikhutdinov. 2003. “Simplified estimation of seismic life-cycle costs.” In Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Assessment, design and management, edited by D. M. Frangopol, E. Bruhwiler, M. H. Faber, and B. Adey, 229–237. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bernandini, E., S. M. J. Spence, D. K. Kwon, and A. Kareem. 2015. “Performance-based design of high-rise buildings for occupant comfort.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (10): 04014244. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001223.
Ciampoli, M., F. Petrini, and G. Augusti. 2011. “Performance based wind engineering: Towards a general procedure.” Struct. Saf. 33 (6): 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.07.001.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Cornell, C. A., and H. Krawinkler. 2000. “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA. Accessed September, 2017. http://peer.berkeley.edu/news/2000spring/index.html.
Davenport, A. G. 1967. “The dependence of wind load upon meteorological parameters.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Int. Research Seminar on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, 19–82. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
Deodatis, G. 1996. “Simulation of ergodic multivariate stochastic processes.” J. Eng. Mech. 122 (8): 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:8(778).
Duthinh, D., and E. Simiu. 2010. “Safety of structures in strong winds and earthquakes: Multihazard considerations.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (3): 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000108.
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012a. Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 1. FEMA P58-1. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012b. Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 2. FEMA P58-2. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2012c. Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 3. FEMA P58-3. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fragiadakis, M., N. D. Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis. 2006. “Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost.” Struct. Multi. Optim. 32 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0009-y.
Gupta, A., and H. Krawinkler. 1999. Seismic demands for the performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures. Stanford, CA: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ.
Hamburger, R. O., and J. O. Malley. 2016. Seismic design of steel special moment frames: A guide for practicing engineers. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Hartloper, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2017. “Updates to the ASCE-41-13 revisions for the nonlinear modeling of steel wide-flange columns for performance based earthquake engineering.” In Proc., EUROSTEEL, 3072–3081. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Holmes, J. 2015. Wind Loading of Structures. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Hutt, C. M., I. Almufti, M. Willford, and G. Deierlein. 2016. “Seismic loss and downtime assessment of existing tall steel-framed buildings and strategies for increased resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001314.
Hwang, S. H., A. Elkady, S. A. Bardaweel, and D. G. Lignos. 2015. “Earthquake loss assessment of steel frame buildings designed in highly seismic regions.” In Proc., 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015), 1496–1512. Crete Island, Greece.
Hwang, S. H., and D. G. Lignos. 2017a. “Earthquake-induced loss assessment of steel frame buildings with special moment frames designed in highly seismic regions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (13): 2141–2162. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2898.
Hwang, S. H., and D. G. Lignos. 2017b. “Effect of modeling assumptions on the earthquake-induced losses and collapse risk of steel-frame buildings with special concentrically braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (9): 04017116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001851.
Ibarra, L. F., R. A. Medina, and H. Krawinkler. 2005. “Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (12): 1489–1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2007. Bases for design of structures—Serviceability of buildings and walkways against vibrations. ISO10137. Geneva: ISO.
Kaimal, J. C., J. C. Wyngaard, Y. Izumi, and O. R. Cot. 1972. “Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence.” Q. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 98 (417): 563–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709841707.
Koliou, M., H. Masoomi, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2017. “Performance assessment of tilt-up big-box buildings subjected to extreme hazards: Tornadoes and earthquakes.” J. Struct. Eng. 31 (5): 04017060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001059.
Li, Y., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2012. “Loss-based formulation for multiple hazards with application to residential buildings.” Eng. Struct. 38: 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.006.
Liu, M., S. A. Burns, and Y. K. Wen. 2003. “Optimal seismic design of steel frame buildings based on life cycle cost considerations.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (9): 1313–1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.273.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Mitropoulou, C. C., N. D. Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis. 2011. “Advances in life cycle cost analysis of structures.” In Vol. 21 of Computational methods in earthquake engineering and computational methods in applied sciences, edited by M. Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis, and N. Lagaros, 539–557. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture. 2010. Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2017. “Extreme wind speed data sets: Hurricane wind speeds.” Accessed November 2017. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/winds/hurricane.htm.
Ramirez, C. M., A. B. Liel, J. Mitrani-Reiser, C. B. Haselton, A. D. Spear, J. Steiner, G. G. Deierlein, and E. Miranda. 2012. “Expected earthquake damage and repair costs in reinforced concrete frame buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (11): 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2216.
Ramirez, C. M., and E. Miranda. 2012. “Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (11): 1477–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2217.
Rojas, H. A., C. Foley, and S. Pezeshk. 2011. “Risk-based seismic design for optimal structural and nonstructural system performance.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (3): 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3609877.
Smith, M. A., and L. A. Caragoglia. 2011. “Monte carlo based method for the dynamic fragility analysis of tall buildings under turbulent wind loading.” Eng. Struct. 33 (2): 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.024.
Spence, S. M. J., E. Bernandini, and A. Kareem. 2015. “A first step towards a general methodology for the performance based design of wind-excited structures.” In Proc., Structures Congress, 1482–1493. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Spence, S. M. J., W. C. Chuang, P. Tabusso, E. Bernandini, A. Kareem, L. Palizzolo, and A. Pirrotta. 2016. “Performance-based engineering of wind-excited structures: A general methodology.” In Proc., Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress, 1269–1282. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Spence, S. M. J., and A. Kareem. 2014. “Performance-based design and optimization of uncertain wind-excited dynamic building systems.” Eng. Struct. 78: 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.026.
Terzic, V., S. K. Merrifield, and S. A. Mahin. 2012. “Lifecycle cost comparisons for different structural systems designed for the same location.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Lisbon, Portugal.
USGS. 2017. “Unified hazard tool.” Accessed November 2017. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Wen, Y. K., and Y. J. Kang. 2001. “Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (3): 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(330).
Zareian, F., and R. A. Medina. 2010. “A practical method for proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems.” Comput. Struct. 88 (1–2): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.08.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 145Issue 5May 2019

History

Received: Apr 14, 2018
Accepted: Oct 11, 2018
Published online: Feb 28, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alexandros Nikellis, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York, 212 Ketter Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York, 212 Ketter Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-330X. Email: [email protected]
Andrew S. Whittaker, F.ASCE
SUNY Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York, 212 Ketter Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share