Technical Papers
Jul 28, 2018

Seismic Behavior of Symmetric and Asymmetric Steel Structures with Rigid and Semirigid Diaphragms

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 10

Abstract

The torsional behavior of braced frames can be significantly influenced by the sequence of brace buckling, hinge development in beams or columns, and in-plane deformation of the diaphragm, even for the case of symmetric configurations. To understand these effects, six four-story steel braced structures with different diaphragm in-plane stiffness and configurations of vertical force resisting systems are investigated in this paper. The analyses indicate that (1) the torsional coefficient used to define the levels of torsional irregularity in the current design provision can significantly underestimate the real torsional behavior in the inelastic range, (2) the ultimate strength of structures with rigid diaphragms is higher than that of structures with semirigid diaphragms, (3) asymmetric structures with extreme torsional irregularities and semirigid diaphragms evidenced the highest ductility demands, and (4) higher modes significantly affect behavior after the onset of inelasticity due to buckling of the braces. Two new measures of torsional behavior, a maximum rotation angle and a maximum interstory rotation angle, are proposed and found to give better insight than current measures based on the displacement used in the current design provision.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support of the Via Department of Civil and Structural Engineering at Virginia Tech for this work is gratefully acknowledged.

References

AISC. 2016a. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341-16. Chicago: AISC.
AISC. 2016b. Specification for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 360-16. Chicago, IL: AISC.
ASCE. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE 41-13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2018. Standard specification for cold-formed welded and seamless carbon steel structural tubing in rounds and shapes. ASTM A500/A500M-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Basu, D., and S. K. Jain. 2004. “Seismic analysis of asymmetric buildings with flexible floor diaphragms.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (8): 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:8(1169).
Charney, F. A. 2008. “Unintended consequences of modeling damping in structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (4): 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(581).
Charney, F. A., and W. M. Downs. 2004. “Modeling procedures for panel zone deformations in moment resisting frames.” In Proc., 5th Int. Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures, 121–130. Chicago: AISC.
Cruz, C., and E. Miranda. 2017. “Evaluation of damping ratios for the seismic analysis of tall buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (1): 04016144. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001628.
DeBock, D. J., A. B. Liel, C. B. Haselton, J. D. Hooper, and R. A. Henige, Jr. 2013. “Importance of seismic design accidental torsion requirements for building collapse capacity.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (6): 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2375.
De la Llera, J. C., and A. K. Chopra. 1994. “Estimation of accidental torsion effects for seismic design of buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (1): 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:1(102).
Elkady, A., and D. G. Lignos. 2015. “Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (8): 1289–1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2519.
Erduran, E. 2012. “Evaluation of Rayleigh damping and its influence on engineering demand parameter estimates.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (14): 1905–1919. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2164.
Erduran, E., and K. L. Ryan. 2011. “Effects of torsion on the behavior of peripheral steel-braced frame systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (5): 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1032.
Essa, H. S., R. Tremblay, and C. A. Rogers. 2003. “Behavior of roof deck diaphragms under quasistatic cyclic loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (12): 1658. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1658).
Fleischman, R. B., and K. T. Farrow. 2001. “Dynamic behavior of perimeter lateral-system structures with flexible diaphragms.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (5): 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.36.
Ju, S. H., and M. C. Lin. 1999. “Comparison of building analyses assuming rigid or flexible floors.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (1): 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:1(25).
Kim, S.-C., and D. W. White. 2003. “Linear static analysis of low-rise buildings with flexible diaphragms using the structural separation method.” Eng. Struct. 26: 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.08.013.
Kim, S.-C., and D. W. White. 2004. “Nonlinear analysis of a one-story low-rise masonry building with a flexible diaphragm subjected to seismic excitation.” Eng. Struct. 26: 2053–2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.06.008.
Koliou, M., A. Filiatrault, D. J. Kelly, and J. Lawson. 2016a. “Buildings with rigid walls and flexible roof diaphragms. I: Evaluation of current U.S. seismic provisions.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (3): 04015166. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001438.
Koliou, M., A. Filiatrault, D. J. Kelly, and J. Lawson. 2016b. “Distributed yielding concept for improved seismic collapse performance of rigid wall-flexible diaphragm buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (2): 04015137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001386.
Lignos, D. G., E. Karamanci, and G. Martin. 2012. “A steel database for modeling post-buckling behavior and fracture of concentrically braced frames under earthquakes.” In Proc., 15 World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: Portuguese Association for Earthquake Engineering.
McKenna, F., G. L. Fenves, and M. H. Scott. 2013. OpenSEES, version 2.4.2. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Moon, S. K., and D.-G. Lee. 1992. “Effects of inplane floor slab flexibility on the seismic behaviour of building structures.” Eng. Struct. 16 (2): 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(94)90038-8.
Nikolaidou, V., P. Latreille, C. A. Rogers, and D. G. Lignos. 2016. Characterization of CFS frame diaphragm behavior. RP16-2. Washington, DC: American Iron and Steel Institute.
NRCC (National Research Council Canada). 2010. National building code of Canada. Ottawa: NRCC.
Paultre, P., J. Proulx, C. E. Ventura, R. Tremblay, C. A. Rogers, C-P. Lamarche, and M. Turek. 2004. “Experimental investigation and dynamic simulations of low-rise steel buildings for efficient seismic design.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2014. “PEER ground motion database.” Accessed February 2014. http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
Sabelli, R., C. W. Roeder, and J. F. Hajjar. 2013. Seismic design of steel special concentrically braced frame systems. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Sadashiva, V. K., G. A. MacRae, B. L. Deam, and M. S. Spooner. 2012. “Quantifying the seismic response of structures with flexible diaphragms.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (10): 1365–1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1187.
Saffarini, H. S., and M. M. Qudaimat. 1992. “In-plane floor deformations in RC structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 118 (11): 3089–3102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:11(3089).
SDI (Steel Deck Institute). 1987. Diaphragm design manual. 2nd ed. Canton, OH: SDI.
Shrestha, K. M. 2011. “Use of flexible and ductile roof diaphragms in the seismic design of single-storey steel buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ.
Tena-Colunga, A., and D. P. Abrams. 1996. “Seismic behavior of structures with flexible diaphragms.” J. Struct. Eng. 122 (4): 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:4(439).
Tremblay, R., T. Berair, and A. Filiatrault. 2000. “Experimental behavior of low-rise steel buildings with flexible roof diaphragms.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–8. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Tremblay, R., and S. F. Stiemer. 1996. “Seismic behavior of single-story steel structure with a flexible diaphragm.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 23 (1): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1139/l96-006.
Uriz, P., and S. A. Mahin. 2008. Toward earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
USGS. 2014a. “U.S. seismic design maps.” Accessed February 2014. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php.
USGS. 2014b. “Unified hazard tool.” Accessed February 2014. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/index.php.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 10October 2018

History

Received: Aug 14, 2017
Accepted: Feb 28, 2018
Published online: Jul 28, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Dec 28, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chia-Hung Fang, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Structural Engineer, Building Structures, WSP USA, One Penn Plaza, 2nd Floor, 250 W 34th St., New York, NY 10119 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Roberto T. Leon, Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
David H. Burrows Professor of Construction Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 20461. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share