Technical Papers
May 28, 2018

Wind Pressure Mitigation on Gable Roofs for Low-Rise Buildings Using Spoilers

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 8

Abstract

Previous wind disaster investigations have indicated that the roof systems of low-rise buildings often suffer severe damage under the negative wind pressure caused by the sharp corners between the walls and the roof. Technical mitigation has been demonstrated to be efficient for decreasing the peak and mean wind pressure on the roof system through mounting mitigation devices or modifying the roof geometry. Previous studies on low-rise buildings were conducted primarily for flat roofs, and the wind pressure effect on the mitigation device itself was not considered. The current study conducted wind tunnel tests for a low-rise gable-roof building with spoilers to investigate the wind pressure mitigation effect on the roof region. Several influencing factors including the height, width, angles and positions (at the eave, gable wall, and ridge) were taken into account. In particular, the wind pressure on the spoilers themselves was measured to comprehensively evaluate the uplift force for a roof system involving the roof region and spoilers. The test results showed that the spoilers at the gable wall mitigate wind pressure the most, followed by the spoilers at the eave; a spoiler at the ridge showed no noticeable decrease in the wind pressure on the roof. Relative to the width and height of the spoilers, the angle of the spoilers had the strongest influence on the wind pressure reduction, with the recommended angles of 0° for spoilers at the eave and 10–25° for spoilers at the gable wall. Considering the economic concerns and construction details, the recommended height of a spoiler is 0.2 to 0.6 m, and the recommended width is 1/20 of the length of the whole building. Although a spoiler can effectively mitigate the wind pressure on the gable roof region of a low-rise building, the test results revealed that this configuration creates a relatively large uplift force that is transmitted to the roof system. Thus, it is recommended that the increased uplift force over the entire roof system including spoilers be considered under extreme wind loads in the design stage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding for the authors was provided by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2014BAL05B03). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of those acknowledged here.

References

Aerodynamic Database. n.d. “Aerodynamic database for non-isolated low-rise buildings.” Accessed May 2017. http://www.wind.arch.t-kougei.ac.jp/system/eng/contents/code/tpu.
AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). 2004. AIJ recommendations for loads on buildings. Tokyo, Japan: AIJ.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Banks, D. 2000. “The suction induced by conical vortices on low rise buildings with flat roofs.” Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State Univ.
Bitsuamlak, G. T., W. Warsido, E. Ledesma, and A. G. Chowdhury. 2013. “Aerodynamic mitigation of roof and wall corner suctions using simple architectural elements.” J. Eng. Mech. 139 (3): 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000505.
Blackmore, P. A. 1988. “Load reduction on flat roofs: The effect of edge profile.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 29 (1): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(88)90148-1.
Blessing, C., A. G. Chowdhury, J. Lin, and P. Huang. 2009. “Full-scale validation of vortex suppression techniques for mitigation of roof uplift.” Eng. Struct. 31 (12): 2936–2946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.07.021.
Blocken, B., T. V. Hooff, L. Aanen, and B. Bronsema. 2011. “Computational analysis of the performance of a Venturi-shaped roof for natural ventilation: Venturi-effect versus wind-blocking effect.” Comput. Fluids 48 (1): 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.04.012.
Blocken, B., P. Moonen, T. Stathopoulos, and J. Carmeliet. 2008a. “Numerical study on the existence of the venturi effect in passages between perpendicular buildings.” J. Eng. Mech. 134 (12): 1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:12(1021).
Blocken, B., T. Stathopoulos, and J. Carmeliet. 2008b. “Wind environmental conditions in passages between two long narrow perpendicular buildings.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 21 (4): 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:4(280).
Cochran, L. S., and E. C. English. 1997. “Reduction of roof wind loads by architectural features.” Archit. Sci. Rev. 40 (3): 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.1997.9697388.
Huang, P., X. Peng, and M. Gu. 2014. “Aerodynamic devices to mitigate rooftop suctions on a gable roof building.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 135: 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.10.015.
Kopp, G. A., C. Mans, and D. Surry. 2005a. “Wind effects of parapets on low buildings. 4: Mitigation of corner loads with alternative geometries.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 93 (11): 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.08.004.
Kopp, G. A., D. Surry, and C. Mans. 2005b. “Wind effects of parapets on low buildings. 1: Basic aerodynamics and local loads.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 93 (11): 817–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.08.006.
Krishna, P. 1995. “Wind loads on low rise buildings: A review.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 54–55 (94): 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00055-I.
Kwon, D K., and A. Kareem. 2011. “Peak factors for non-Gaussian load effects revisited.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (12): 1611–1619. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000412.
Lin, J. X., and D. Surry. 1998. “The variation of peak loads with tributary area near corners on flat low building roofs.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 77–78 (5): 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00142-1.
Lin, J. X., D. Surry, and H. W. Tieleman. 1995. “The distribution of pressure near roof corners of flat roof low buildings.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 56 (2): 235–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00089-V.
Robertson, A. P. 1991. “Effect of eaves detail on wind pressures over an industrial building.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 38 (2): 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(91)90051-W.
Savory, E., S. Dalley, and N. Toy. 1992. “The effects of eaves geometry, model scale and approach flow conditions on portal frame building wind loads.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 43 (1–3): 1665–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90576-V.
Stathopoulos, T., A. Baskaran, and P. A. Goh. 1990. “Full-scale measurements of wind pressures on flat roof corners.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 36: 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(90)90103-J.
Suaris, W., and P. Irwin. 2010. “Effect of roof-edge parapets on mitigating extreme roof suctions.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98 (10–11): 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.03.001.
Surry, D., and J. X. Lin. 1995. “The effect of surroundings and roof corner geometric modifications on roof pressures on low-rise buildings.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 58 (1): 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(95)00016-K.
Venturi, G. B. 1799. Experimental enquiries concerning the principle of the lateral communication of motion in fluids: Applied to the explanation of various hydraulic phenomena. 1st ed. Translated by W. Nicholson. London, UK: J. Taylor.
Winterstein, S. R., and T. Kashef. 2000. “Moment-based load and response models with wind engineering applications.” J. Solar Energy Eng. 122 (3): 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1288028.
Wu, F. 2000. “Full-scale study of conical vortices and their effects near roof corners.” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 8August 2018

History

Received: Jul 24, 2017
Accepted: Feb 4, 2018
Published online: May 28, 2018
Published in print: Aug 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 28, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gang Li, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
Hongnan Li, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share