Technical Papers
May 11, 2018

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of FRP Retrofitted Glued-Laminated Beams Subjected to Simulated Blast Loading

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 7

Abstract

An experimental program investigating the potential of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) as a strengthening option for glulam beams subjected to simulated blast loads was undertaken. A total of four different retrofit configurations were investigated along with a fifth alternative for restoring previously damaged beams. Increases in resistance and maximum deflection in the range of 1.35–1.66 and 1.3–1.62, respectively, were obtained when FRP tension laminates with and without confinement were used. Partial-length and full-length confinement prevented premature debonding and significantly altered the failure mode from simple tension failure to a combination of brash tension and compression failure while limiting the damage to a small region. The results also showed that the addition of FRP contributed to an increase of 1.17 in the tensile failure strain relative to the unretrofitted beams. A material predictive model that accounts for strain-rate effects was developed using experimental stress–strain relationships determined from coupon tests. The proposed model compared well with resistance curves obtained from full-scale testing of glulam beam elements subjected to simulated blast loading.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ANSI. 2012. Standard for wood products: Structural glued laminated timber. ANSI A190.1. Tacoma, WA: ANSI/APA.
ASCE/SEI. 2011. Blast protection of buildings. ASCE/SEI 59-11. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2012a. Standard practice for establishing allowable properties for structural glued laminated timber. ASTM D3737-12. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2012b. Standard practice for establishing characteristic values for reinforced glued laminated timber (glulam) beams using mechanics-based models. ASTM D7199. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014a. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014b. Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber. ASTM D143. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test methods of static tests of lumber in structural sizes. ASTM D198. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Barrett, J. D., and W. Lau. 1994. Canadian lumber properties. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Wood Council.
Buchanan, A. H. 1984. “Strength model and design methods for bending and axial load interaction in timber members.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Buchanan, A. H. 1986. “Combined bending and axial loading in lumber.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (12): 2592–2609. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:12(2592).
Buchanan, A. H. 1990. “Bending strength of lumber.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (5): 1213–1229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1213).
Buell, T. W., and H. Saadatmanesh. 2005. “Strengthening timber bridge beams using carbon fibre.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (1): 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:1(173).
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2012. Design and assessment of buildings subjected to blast loads. CSA S850-12. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2015. Qualification code for manufacturers of structural glued-laminated timber. CSA O177. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
Department of Defense. 2008. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 03-340-02: Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Defense.
Department of Defense. 2012. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-010-01: DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Defense.
Dorey, A. B., and J. J. R. Cheng. 1996a. “The behavior of GFRP glued laminated timber beams.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. Advanced Composite. Materials in Bridges and Structures, edited by M. M. El-Badry, 787–794. Montreal, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Dorey, A. B., and J. J. R. Cheng. 1996b. Glass fiber reinforced glued laminated wood beams. Edmonton, AB: Canada-Alberta Agreement Documents, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre.
Dumais, A. J. 2008. Optimized wood components and subassemblies for maximum ductility.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Maine.
Gentile, C., D. Svecova, and S. H. Rizkalla. 2002. “Timber beams strengthened with GFRP bars: Development and applications.” J. Compos. Constr. 6 (1): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:1(11).
Gentile, C. J. 2000. “Flexural strengthening of timber bridge beams using FRP.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba.
Glasstone, S., and P. J. Dolan 1977. The effects of nuclear weapons. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Defense, Energy Research and Development Administration.
Hernandez, R., J. F. Davalos, S. S. Sonti, Y. Kim, and R. C. Moody. 1997. Strength and stiffness of reinforced yellow-poplar glued laminated beams. Madison, WI: US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
Jacques, E. 2016. “Characteristics of reinforced concrete bond at high strain rates.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa.
Jacques, E., A. Lloyd, A. Braimah, M. Saatcioglu, G. Doudak, and O. Abdelalim. 2014. “Influence of high strain-rates on the dynamic flexural material properties of spruce-pine–fir wood studs.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 41 (1): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0141.
Johns, K. C., and S. Lacroix. 2000. “Composite reinforcement of timber in bending.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 27 (5): 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1139/l00-017.
Kimbell, R. G., and J. Fies. 1953. Two typical wood frame houses exposed to energy released by nuclear fission. Washington, DC: National Lumber Manufacturers Association.
Lacroix, D. 2013. “Behaviour of light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa.
Lacroix, D. 2017. “Investigating the behaviour of glulam beams and columns subjected to simulated blast loading.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Ottawa.
Lacroix, D. N., and G. Doudak. 2015. “Investigation of dynamic increase factors in light-frame wood stud walls subjected to out-of-plane blast loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (6): 04014159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001139.
Lacroix, D. N., and G. Doudak. 2018a. “Determining the dynamic increase factor for glued-laminated timber beams.” J. Struct. Eng., in press.
Lacroix, D. N., and G. Doudak. 2018b. “Effects of high strain rates on the response of glulam beams and columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (5): 04018029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002020.
Lacroix, D. N., G. Doudak, and K. El-Domiaty. 2013. “Retrofit options for light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (4): 04013104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000885.
Lindyberg, R. F., and H. J. Dagher. 2012. “ReLAM: Nonlinear probabilistic model for the analysis of reinforced glulam beams in bending.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (6): 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000496.
Lloyd, A., and E. Jacques. 2011. Innovative and cost effective blast strengthening of wood framed structures. Colorado Springs, CO: National Homeland Defense Foundation.
Madsen, B., and A. H. Buchanan. 1986. “Size effects in timber explained by a modified weakest link theory.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 13 (2): 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1139/l86-030.
Marchand, K. A. 2002. BAIT, BASS & RODS testing results. San Antonio: USAF Force Protection Battlelab.
Oswald, C. J. 2005. Component explosive damage assessment workbook (CEDAW) methodology manual V1.0. San Antonio: Baker Engineering and Risk Consultants, Inc.
Plevris, N., and T. Triantafillou. 1992. “FRP-reinforced wood as structural material.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 4 (3): 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1992)4:3(300).
Poulin, M., C. Viau, D. N. Lacroix, and G. Doudak. 2018. “Experimental and analytical investigation of cross-laminated timber panels subjected to out-of-plane blast loads.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (2): 04017197. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001915.
Raftery, G. M., and A. M. Harte. 2011. “Low-grade glued laminated timber reinforced with FRP plate.” Composites Part B 42 (4): 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.029.
Raftery, G. M., and A. M. Harte. 2013. “Nonlinear numerical modelling of FRP reinforced glued laminated timber.” Composites Part B 52 (Sep): 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.038.
Randall, P. A. 1955. Damage to conventional and special types of residences exposed to nuclear effects. Battle Creek, MI: Federal Civil Defense Administration.
Sonti, S. S., H. V. S. GangaRao, and M. C. Superfesky. 1996. “Rehabilitation and strengthening of glulam stringers for bridge superstructures.” In 1st Int. Conf. on Composites in Infrastructures, edited by H. Saadatmanesh and M. R. Ehsani. Tucson, Arizona: Univ. of Arizona.
Syron, W. D. 2010. Strain rate-dependent behavior of laminated strand lumber. M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Maine.
Thomas, D. 2008. “Characterizing connections in coated wood building structures for blast force protection.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Maine.
USAF. 2006. Force protection battlelab vehicle bomb mitigation guide. Lackland AFB, TX: USAF Force Protection Battlelab.
Viau, C., and G. Doudak. 2016a. “Investigating the behavior of light-frame wood stud walls subjected to severe blast loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (12): 04016138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001622.
Viau, C., and G. Doudak. 2016b. “Investigating the behaviour of typical and designed wall-to-floor connections in light-frame wood stud wall structures subjected to blast loading.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 43 (6): 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0452.
Viau, C., D. N. Lacroix, and G. Doudak. 2016. “Damage level assessment of response limits in light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 44 (2): 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2015-0418.
Yang, H., W. Liu, W. Lu, S. Zhu, and Q. Geng. 2016. “Flexural behavior of FRP and steel reinforced glulam beams: Experimental and theoretical evaluation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 106: 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.135.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 7July 2018

History

Received: Jun 30, 2017
Accepted: Jan 16, 2018
Published online: May 11, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 11, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

D. N. Lacroix, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton Univ., Nepean, ON, Canada K1S 5B6 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
G. Doudak, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share