Technical Papers
Apr 23, 2018

Simplified Collapse-Prevention Evaluation for the Reserve System of Low-Ductility Steel Concentrically Braced Frames

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 7

Abstract

Low-ductility steel concentrically braced frames (CBFs) are widely used in buildings as a lateral resistance system in seismic regions around the world due to their high stiffness and strength. Steel CBF buildings have been observed to have reserve capacity after brace fracture in past earthquakes. However, it is difficult for most practicing engineers to evaluate the contribution of the reserve system to the collapse prevention performance of CBF buildings because of its complex inelastic behavior. This study proposes a method to define the reserve system of multistory low-ductility CBF buildings for earthquake loads by performing a static pushover analysis. The multistory CBF building is converted to an equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) CBF system with induced reserve parameters. A simple mathematical model describing the ductility response spectra for the reserve system in moderate seismic regions is established from the results of an extensive parametric study employing the SDOF mode to represent multistory CBF buildings. The collapse prevention capacity of the reserve system for a multistory CBF building can be evaluated by comparing the period of the multistory CBF system with a threshold value. The proposed approach is validated by application to buildings in two case studies. The results demonstrate that the reserve capacity of a multistory CBF plays an important role in collapse prevention. This simplified procedure is intended for a rapid evaluation on the multistory CBF system using an approximate seismic response.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding for authors was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51422802) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT17ZD220). The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of those acknowledged here.

References

Appel, M. E. 2008. “Design of low-ductility chevron braced frames for moderate seismic demands.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ.
Ariyaratana, C., and L. A. Fahnestock. 2011. “Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength.” Eng. Struct. 33 (1): 77–89.
ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. SEI/ASCE 7-10. New York: ASCE.
Bradley, C., L. A. Fahnestock, E. M. Hines, and J. Sizemore. 2015. “Full-scale cyclic testing of an ordinary concentrically-braced frame.” Structures Congress 2015, 702–713. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bradley, C. R., L. A. Fahnestock, E. M. Hines, and J. G. Sizemore. 2017. “Full-scale cyclic testing of low-ductility concentrically braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (6): 04017029.
Callister, J. T., and R. G. Pekelnicky. 2011. “Seismic evaluation of an existing low ductility braced frame building in California.” ASCE Structures Congress 2011. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chopra, A. K., and R. K. Goel. 2002. “A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 561–582.
Dolšek, M., and P. Fajfar. 2005. “Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34 (1): 49–66.
Fajfar, P. 1999. “Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28 (9): 979–993.
Fajfar, P. 2000. “A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design.” Earthquake Spectra 16 (3): 573–592.
Fajfar, P., and M. Fischinger. 1988. “N2—A method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular buildings.” In Proc., 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 111–116. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
FEMA. 2000a. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000b. State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking. FEMA 355C. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gupta, B., and S. K. Kunnath. 2000. “Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures.” Earthquake Spectra 16 (2): 367–392.
Hines, E. M., M. E. Appel, and P. J. Cheever. 2009. “Collapse performance of low-ductility chevron braced steel frames in moderate seismic regions.” AISC Eng. J. 46 (3): 149–180.
Hines, E. M., L. Baise, and S. Swift. 2011. “Ground-motion suite selection for eastern North America.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (3): 358–366.
Hines, E. M., and L. A. Fahnestock. 2010 “Design philosophy for steel structures in moderate seismic regions.” In Vol. 5 of Proc., 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 4086–4094. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Hsiao, P. C. 2012. “Seismic performance evaluation of concentrically braced frames.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
Iyama, J. 2009. “Estimation of increasing response of steel frame after fracture of structural member under strong earthquake ground motions.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, STESSA 2009, 481–486. Bethlehem, PA: ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University.
Karamanci, E., and D. G. Lignos. 2014. “Computational approach for collapse assessment of concentrically braced frames in seismic regions.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A4014019.
Kim, J., and H. Choi. 2005. “Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames.” Eng. Struct. 27 (2): 285–300.
Krawinkler, H., and G. D. P. K. Seneviratna. 1998. “Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation.” Eng. Struct. 20 (4–6): 452–464.
Lai, J. W., and S. A. Mahin. 2015. “Strongback system: A way to reduce damage concentration in steel-braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (9): 04014223.
Lehman, D. E., C. W. Roeder, D. Herman, S. Johnson, and B. Kotulka. 2008. “Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (6): 890–901.
Li, G., and L. A. Fahnestock. 2013. “Seismic response of single-degree-of-freedom systems representing low-ductility steel concentrically-braced frames with reserve capacity.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (2): 199–211.
Liu, J., and A. Astaneh-Asl. 2000. “Cyclic testing of simple connections including effects of slab.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (1): 32–39.
Nelson, T. A. 2007. “Performance of a 9-story low-ductility moment resisting frame under moderate seismic demands.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ.
Okazaki, T., M. D. Engelhardt, J. K. Hong, C. M. Uang, and A. Drolias. 2015. “Improved link-to-column connections for steel eccentrically braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (8): 04014201.
Okazaki, T., D. G. Lignos, T. Hikino, and K. Kajiwara. 2013a. “Dynamic response of a chevron concentrically braced frame.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (4): 515–525.
Okazaki, T., D. G. Lignos, M. Midorikawa, J. M. Ricles, and J. Love. 2013b. “Damage to steel buildings observed after the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.” Supplement, Earthquake Spectra 29 (S1): S219–S243.
Qu, B., F. Sanchez-Zamora, and M. Pollino. 2015. “Transforming seismic performance of deficient steel concentrically braced frames through implementation of rocking cores.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (5): 04014139.
Rai, D., and S. Goel. 2003. “Seismic evaluation and upgrading of chevron braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel. Res. 59 (8): 971–994.
Sen, A. D., C. W. Roeder, J. W. Berman, D. E. Lehman, C. H. Li, A. C. Wu, and K. C. Tsai. 2016. “Experimental investigation of chevron concentrically braced frames with yielding beams.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (12): 04016123.
Shen, J., W. Rou, B. Akbas, O. Seker, and E. Uckan. 2015. “Near-collapse behavior of steel buildings with non-ductile concentrically braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 113: 101–114.
Sizemore, J. G., A. Davaran, L. A. Fahnestock, R. Tremblay, and E. M. Hines. 2014. “Seismic behavior of low-ductility concentrically-braced frames.” Structures Congress 2014, 2369–2380. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sizemore, J. G., L. A. Fahnestock, E. M. Hines, and C. R. Bradley. 2015. “Full-scale cyclic testing of a low-ductility concentrically-braced frame.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA 2015), 168–177. Shanghai, China: Tongji University.
Sizemore, J. G., L. A. Fahnestock, E. M. Hines, and C. R. Bradley. 2017. “Parametric study of low-ductility concentrically braced frames under cyclic static loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (6): 04017032.
Stoakes, C. D. 2012. “Beam-column connection flexural behavior and seismic collapse performance of concentrically braced frames.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Stoakes, C. D., and L. A. Fahnestock. 2011. “Cyclic flexural testing of concentrically braced frame beam-column connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (7): 739–747.
Tapia-Hernández, E., and A. Tena-Colunga. 2014. “Code-oriented methodology for the seismic design of regular steel moment resisting braced frames.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (4): 1683–1709.
Tena-Colunga, A. 2001. “Displacement ductility demand spectra for the seismic evaluation of structures.” Eng. Struct. 23 (10): 1319–1330.
Tremblay, R. 2003. “Achieving a stable inelastic seismic response for multi-story concentrically braced steel frames.” AISC Eng. J. 40 (2): 111–129.
Tremblay, R., A. Filiatrault, M. Bruneau, M. Nakashima, H. G. Prion, and R. DeVall. 1996. “Seismic design of steel buildings: Lessons from the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 23 (3): 727–756.
Tremblay, R., A. Filiatrault, P. Timler, and M. Bruneau. 1995. “Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 22 (2): 338–360.
Uriz, P., F. C. Filippou, and S. A. Mahin. 2008. “Model for cyclic inelastic buckling of steel braces.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (4): 619–628.
Uriz, P., and S. A. Mahin. 2008. Towards earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Whittaker, A. S., C. Uang, and V. V. Bertero. 1990. An experimental study of the behavior of dual steel systems. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 7July 2018

History

Received: Jun 28, 2017
Accepted: Dec 13, 2017
Published online: Apr 23, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 23, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gang Li, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province 116024, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Zhi-Qian Dong [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
Hong-Nan Li, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province 116024, China; Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu Univ., Shenyang, Liaoning Province 110168, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share