Technical Papers
Dec 15, 2017

Postearthquake Strength Assessment of Steel Moment-Resisting Frame with Multiple Beam-Column Fractures Using Local Monitoring Data

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 2

Abstract

Quantitative reports on postearthquake infrastructure condition are valuable to engineers, building owners, local government entities, and the public. Despite their utility, sensor-based protocols have not been widely embraced, primarily due to a lack of proper demonstrations. This paper introduces a methodology for determining the postearthquake strength of a steel moment-resisting frame with multiple beam-column fractures based on local monitoring data. The damage index (DI), an existing metric based on dynamic strain measurements, is applied to quantify damage-induced reductions in bending stiffness at each beam end in the frame with decoupling damage interaction effects. An analytical model with updated local stiffness information enables the estimation of the building’s reduced strength. The proposed methodology may be automated to provide crucial structural information that can optimize and supplement visual inspections immediately after an earthquake so that emergency plans may be initiated promptly. The methodology is first validated using experimental observations and sensor data collected during a substructure test. Then its application to strength reduction estimation of multistory, multibay frames is examined with shake table tests on a large-scale three-story steel frame. Fractures at beam-column connections are perfectly tracked in all damage stages using DI. Estimated reductions in base shear and stiffness are among the results produced, which permit explicit comparisons to performance design limits. Appropriate FEMA connection damage index values are included in the discussions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Research funding is partially provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science with Award PE15758. to the authors thank Shota Shimmoto and Yongtao Bai for their support with the experimentation.

References

ATC (Applied Technology Council). (1996). “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings.” ATC-40, Redwood City, CA.
Bai, Y., Kurata, M., Nakashima, M., and Florez, J. (2016). “Macromodeling of crack damage in steel beams subjected to nonstationary low cycle fatigue.” J. Struct. Eng., 04016076.
Bonowitz, D., Durkin, M., Gates, W., Mordern, M., and Youssef, N. (1995). “Surveys and assessment of damage to buildings affected by the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994.”, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Richmond, CA.
Bonowitz, D., and Maison, B. F. (2003). “Northridge welded steel moment-frame damage data and its use for rapid loss estimation.” Earthquake Spectra, 19(2), 335–364.
Brownjohn, J. M. W. (2003). “Ambient vibration studies for system identification of tall buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(1), 71–95.
Brownjohn, J. M. W., Moyo, P., Omenzetter, P., and Lu, Y. (2003). “Assessment of highway bridge upgrading by dynamic testing and finite-element model updating.” J. Bridge Eng., 162–172.
Çelebi, M., and Sanli, A. (2002). “GPS in pioneering dynamic monitoring of long-period structures.” Earthquake Spectra, 18(1), 47–61.
Çelebi, M., Sanli, A., Sinclair, M., Gallant, S., and Radulescu, D. (2004). “Real-time seismic monitoring needs of a building owner—and the solution: A cooperative effort.” Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), 333–346.
Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K. (2002). “A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561–582.
Elnashai, A. S. (2001). “Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications.” Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(1), 51–69.
Fajfar, P. (1999). “Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(9), 979–993.
FEMA and ASCE. (2000). “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” FEMA 356, Washington, DC.
FEMA and SAC Joint Venture. (2000). “Recommended postearthquake evaluation and repair criteria for welded steel moment-frame buildings.” FEMA 352, Washington, DC.
Goel, R. K., and Chopra, A. K. (2004). “Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 20(1), 225–254.
Kohler, M. D., Davis, P. M., and Safak, E. (2005). “Earthquake and ambient vibration monitoring of the steel-frame UCLA factor building.” Earthquake Spectra, 21(3), 715–736.
Kohler, M. D., Heaton, T. H., and Bradford, S. C. (2007). “Propagating waves in the steel, moment-frame factor building recorded during earthquakes.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(4), 1334–1345.
Krawinkler, H., and Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. (1998). “Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation.” Eng. Struct., 20(4–6), 452–464.
Kurata, M., Li, X., Fujita, K., and Yamaguchi, M. (2013). “Piezoelectric dynamic strain monitoring for detecting local seismic damage in steel buildings.” Smart Mater. Struct., 22(11), 115002.
Lemaitre, J. (1992). A course on damage mechanics, Springer, Berlin.
Li, X. (2015). “Evaluation of earthquake-induced local damage in steel moment-resisting frames using wireless piezoelectric strain sensing.” Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, Japan.
Li, X., Kurata, M., and Nakashima, M. (2015). “Evaluating damage extent of fractured beams in steel moment-resisting frames using dynamic strain responses.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(4), 563–581.
Li, X., Kurata, M., and Nakashima, M. (2016). “Simplified derivation of a damage curve for seismically induced beam fracture in steel moment-resisting frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 4016019.
Li, X., Kurata, M., and Suzuki, A. (2017). “Decoupling algorithm for evaluating multiple beam damages in steel moment-resisting frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 46(7), 1045–1064.
Lovse, J., Teskey, W., and Lachapelle, G. (1995). “Dynamic deformation monitoring of tall structure using GPS technology.” J. Survey Eng., 35–40.
Mahin, S. A. (1998). “Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake.” Eng. Struct., 20(4–6), 261–270.
Mahin, S., Malley, J., and Hamburger, R. (2002). “Overview of the FEMA/SAC program for reduction of earthquake hazards in steel moment frame structures.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 58(5–8), 511–528.
Matarazzo, T. J., and Pakzad, S. N. (2016). “STRIDE for structural identification using expectation maximization: Iterative output-only method for modal identification.” J. Eng. Mech., 4015109.
Nakashima, M., Lavan, O., Kurata, M., and Luo, Y. (2014). “Earthquake engineering research needs in light of lessons learned from the 2011 Tohoku earthquake” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr., 13(S1), 141–149.
Ni, Y., Xia, Y., Liao, W. Y., and Ko, J. M. (2009). “Technology innovation in developing the structural health monitoring system for Guangzhou New TV Tower.” Struct. Control Health Monitor., 16(1), 73–98.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. (2010). “Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings.”, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Porter, K. A., Mitrani-Reiser, J., and Beck, J. L. (2006). “Near-real-time loss estimation for instrumented buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 15, 3–20.
Rodgers, J. E., and Çelebi, M. (2006). “Seismic response and damage detection analyses of an instrumented steel moment-framed building.” J. Struct. Eng., 1543–1552.
SAP2000 version 15 [Computer software]. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA.
Shahidi, S. G., Pakzad, S. N., Ricles, J. M., Martin, J. R., Olgun, C. G., and Godfrey, E. A. (2015). “Behavior and damage of the Washington Monument during the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake.” Geol. Soc. Am., 2509(13), 235–252.
Skolnik, D. A., and Wallace, J. W. (2010). “Critical assessment of interstory drift measurements.” J. Struct. Eng., 1574–1584.
Skolnik, D., Lei, Y., Yu, E., and Wallace, J. W. (2006). “Identification, model updating, and response prediction of an instrumented 15-story steel-frame building.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(3), 781–802.
Structural Engineers Association of California. (1995). Vision 2000: Performance based seismic engineering of buildings, Sacramento, CA.
Suzuki, A., Kurata, M., Li, X., and Shimmoto, S. (2017). “Residual structural capacity evaluation of steel moment-resisting frames with dynamic-strain-based model updating method.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 46(11), 1791–1810.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 2February 2018

History

Received: Jul 7, 2016
Accepted: Aug 16, 2017
Published online: Dec 15, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 15, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thomas J. Matarazzo, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
JSPS Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto Univ., Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Masahiro Kurata, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto Univ., Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Hiromichi Nishino
Graduate Student, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Kyoto Univ., Kyodai-Katsura, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan.
Akiko Suzuki
Ph.D. Student, Dipartimento di Strutture per l’Ingegneria e l’Architettura, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share