Technical Papers
Dec 21, 2017

Performance Assessment of Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Structures Using Fragility Methodology

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper presents a probabilistic study using the fragility function method for the performance assessment of two 1/6-scale, single-bay, three- and eight-story steel moment-resisting frame structures representing rigid and flexible framed structures, respectively. Considering the impact of the uncertainties in seismic loading and response of structures, the adopted fragility methodology is believed to provide a realistic and robust assessment of seismic performance and vulnerability of the structures. Fragility curves were developed by considering appropriate performance levels and using the response data from nonlinear time-history analyses of the structures in longitudinal and transverse directions with respective moment and shear connections. Results of the fragility analysis showed that inclusion of panel zone reinforcement in numerical simulation of the framed structures lowers the seismic vulnerability and probability of damage to the structures. The relatively lower seismic performances of the structures in the transverse direction with shear connections and lower lateral stiffness were demonstrated as well. Moreover, the eight-story structure was found to be more vulnerable to seismic loading and severe damages compared to the three-story structure. The adopted fragility method can serve as an effective tool for assessing the performance and safety levels of structures, and in decision making as well as financing for seismic protection.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Akkar, S., Sucuoğlu, H., and Yakut, A. (2005). “Displacement-based fragility functions for low- and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 21(4), 901–927.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-10, Reston, VA.
ASTM. (2015). “Standard specification for high-strength low-alloy columbium-vanadium structural steel.” ASTM A572, West Conshohocken, PA.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). “Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis.”, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Berman, J. W., Lowes, L. N., Baldvins, N. M., Low, N. A., and Janes, T. N. (2010). “Performance based design tools for steel plate shear walls.” Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 3443–3454.
Cherng, R. H. (2000). “Preliminary study on the fragility curves for steel structures in Taipei.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Seismol., 3(1), 35–42.
FEMA. (2000a). “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” FEMA 356, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2000b). “State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking.” FEMA 355C, Washington, DC.
Güneyisi, E. M. (2012). “Seismic reliability of steel moment resisting framed buildings retrofitted with buckling restrained braces.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(5), 853–874.
Kazantzi, A. K., Righiniotis, T. D., and Chryssanthopoulos, M. K. (2008). “Fragility and hazard analysis of a welded steel moment resisting frame.” J. Earthquake Eng., 12(4), 596–615.
Kazantzi, A. K., Righiniotis, T. D., and Chryssanthopoulos, M. K. (2011). “A simplified fragility methodology for regular steel MRFs.” J. Earthquake Eng., 15(3), 390–403.
Kazantzi, A. K., Vamvatsikos, D., and Lignos, D. G. (2013). “Model parameter uncertainty effects on the seismic performance of a 4-story steel moment-resisting frame.” 11th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, Columbia Univ., New York.
Kazantzi, A. K., Vamvatsikos, D., and Lignos, D. G. (2014). “Seismic performance of a steel moment-resisting frame subject to strength and ductility uncertainty.” Eng. Struct., 78(Nov), 69–77.
Lee, S. W., Yi, W. H., and Kim, H. J. (2014). “Seismic fragility functions for steel moment resisting frames using incremental dynamic analyses.” J. Comput. Struct. Eng. Inst. Korea, 27(6), 509–516.
Mandal, T. K., Pujari, N. N., and Ghosh, S. (2013). “A comparative study of seismic fragility estimates using different numerical methods.” 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
Mehary, S. T., and Dusicka, P. (2015). “Seismic retrofit benefit considering statewide transportation assessment.”, Portland State Univ., Portland, OR.
Noroozinejad Farsangi, E., Hashemi Rezvani, F., Talebi, M., and Hashemi, S. A. H. (2016). “Seismic risk analysis of steel-MRFs by means of fragility curves in high seismic zones.” Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(9), 1227–1240.
OpenSees [Computer software]. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
SAP2000 [Computer software]. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T. (2000). “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech., 1224–1231.
Skalomenos, K. A., Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., and Beskos, D. E. (2015). “Modeling level selection for seismic analysis of concrete-filled steel tube/moment-resisting frames by using fragility curves.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(2), 199–220.
Xu, H., and Gardoni, P. (2016). “Probabilistic capacity and seismic demand models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete buildings based on three-dimensional analyses.” Eng. Struct., 112, 200–214.
Yakut, A., and Yilmaz, H. (2008). “Correlation of deformation demands with ground motion intensity.” J. Struct. Eng., 1818–1828.
Zhang, J., and Zirakian, T. (2015). “Probabilistic assessment of structures with SPSW systems and LYP steel infill plates using fragility function method.” Eng. Struct., 85, 195–205.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 144Issue 3March 2018

History

Received: Jan 14, 2016
Accepted: Aug 10, 2017
Published online: Dec 21, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 21, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ayman Mosallam, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Tadeh Zirakian [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Construction Management, California State Univ., Northridge, CA 91330. E-mail: [email protected]
Ayman Abdelaal [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA 92697. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share