Technical Papers
May 9, 2017

System-Level Seismic Risk Assessment Methodology: Application to Reinforced Masonry Buildings with Boundary Elements

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 9

Abstract

The development of system-level seismic fragility curves, which describe the probability of building systems reaching different damage states under a given ground motion intensity level, is an essential step in preearthquake and postearthquake risk assessment and resilience quantification. Nonetheless, current methodologies for generating fragility curves do not provide clear directions regarding how to integrate the fragility of different building components within the overall building seismic risk assessment. However, several recent studies demonstrate that neglecting some of these components’ contributions may lead to an erroneous seismic risk prediction of the overall building system. Recent research has also emphasized the need to develop alternative techniques to evaluate the system-level fragility to be adopted in the next generation of seismic risk assessment and resilience quantification standards. To address these issues, this study presents a new methodology that adopts two approaches, based on either component-level seismic losses or component strengths, to evaluate the overall system-level fragility. To demonstrate its practical application, the methodology is used to generate fragility curves for a reinforced masonry shear wall building with boundary elements. In this respect, OpenSees is used to develop a three-dimensional model of the building and subsequently conduct incremental dynamic analyses (IDA) by using a suite of 44 ground motion records. On the basis of the IDA results, component-level damage states are identified and used to generate component-level and, subsequently, system-level fragility curves. The analysis results show that the two proposed approaches yield consistent results, for the studied building configuration, that fall between a lower- and an upper-bound fragility estimate of the individual building components.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support for this project was provided through the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada and the Canada Masonry Design Centre (CMDC). Support was also provided by the McMaster University Centre for Effective Design of Structures (CEDS), funded through the Ontario Research and Development Challenge Fund (ORDCF) of the Ministry of Research and Innovation (MRI) and the McMaster Institute for Multi-hazard Systemic Risk Studies (INTERFACE).

References

ASCE/SEI (Structural Engineering Institute). (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.”, Reston, VA.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). (2009). “Damage states and fragility curves for reinforced masonry shear walls: Background document.”, Washington, DC.
Baker, J. W. (2015). “Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis.” Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 579–599.
Banting, B., and El-Dakhakhni, W. (2012). “Force-and displacement-based seismic performance parameters for reinforced masonry structural walls with boundary elements.” J. Struct. Eng., 1477–1491.
Banting, B., and El-Dakhakhni, W. (2014). “Seismic performance quantification of reinforced masonry structural walls with boundary elements.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014001.
Bohl, A., and Adebar, P. (2011). “Plastic hinge lengths in high-rise concrete shear walls.” ACI Struct. J., 108(2), 148–157.
Boole, G. (1854). An investigation of the laws of thought: On which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities, Dover, New York.
Calabrese, A. (2008). “Numerical issues in distributed inelasticity modelling of RC Frame elements for seismic analysis.” Master thesis, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Chang, G. A., and Mander, J. B. (1994). “Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns. Part 1—Evaluation of seismic capacity.”, State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. (2004). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187–199.
Cornell, C. A. (1967). “Bounds on the reliability of structural systems.” J. Struct. Div., 93(1), 171–200.
Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 526–533.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2014). “Design of masonry structures.”, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Erberik, M. A. (2008). “Generation of fragility curves for Turkish masonry buildings considering in-plane failure modes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(3), 387–405.
Ezzeldin, M., El-Dakhakhni, W., and Wiebe, L. (2017). “Experimental assessment of the system-level seismic performance of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete block-wall building with boundary elements.” J. Struct. Eng., 04017063.
Ezzeldin, M., Wiebe, L., and El-Dakhakhni, W. (2016). “Seismic collapse risk assessment of reinforced masonry walls with boundary elements using the FEMA P695 methodology.” J. Struct. Eng., 04016108.
FEMA. (2003). “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2009). “Quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012). “Seismic performance assessment of buildings.”, Washington, DC.
Gehl, P., Seyedi, D. M., and Douglas, J. (2013). “Vector-valued fragility functions for seismic risk evaluation.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 11(2), 365–384.
Grimmelt, M. J., and Schuëller, G. I. (1982). “Benchmark study on methods to determine collapse failure probabilities of redundant structures.” Struct. Saf., 1(2), 93–106.
Heerema, P., Shedid, M., Konstantinidis, D., and El-Dakhakhni, W. (2015). “System-level seismic performance assessment of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete block shear wall building.” J. Struct. Eng., 04015047.
Lagomarsino, S., and Cattari, S. (2013). “Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings.” Seismic vulnerability of structures, P. Gueguen, ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 1–62.
Lagomarsino, S., and Giovinazzi, S. (2006). “Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 4(4), 415–443.
Lu, X., Xie, L., Guan, H., Huang, Y., and Lu, X. (2015). “A shear wall element for nonlinear seismic analysis of super-tall buildings using OpenSees.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 98, 14–25.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1988). “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 1804–1826.
McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., and Scott, M. H. (2000). “Open system for earthquake engineering simulation.” Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Melchers, R. E. (1999). Structural reliability analysis and prediction, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
MSJC (Masonry Standards Joint Committee). (2013). “Building code requirements and specifications for masonry structures.”, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Murcia-Delso, J., and Shing, P. B. (2012). “Fragility analysis of reinforced masonry shear walls.” Earthquake Spectra, 28(4), 1523–1547.
Nielson, B. G., and Bowers, M. E. (2007). “Seismic bridge fragilities for post-design verification.” Proc., 1st US-Italy Seismic Bridge Workshop, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(6), 823–839.
NIST. (2005). “Development of NIST measurement science R&D roadmap: Earthquake risk reduction in buildings.”, Gaithersburg, MD.
NIST. (2010). “Evaluation of the FEMA P695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, Gaithersburg, MD.
Oropeza, M., Michel, C., and Lestuzzi, P. (2010). “A simplified analytical methodology for fragility curves estimation in existing buildings.” Proc., 14th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, European Association of Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pagnini, L. C., Vicente, R., Lagomarsino, S., and Varum, H. (2011). “A mechanical model for the seismic vulnerability assessment of old masonry buildings.” Earthquakes Struct., 2(1), 25–42.
Pitilakis, K., Crowley, H., and Kaynia, A. (2014). “SYNER-G: typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk.” Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 27, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Priestley, M. J. N. (1976). “Cyclic testing of heavily reinforced concrete masonry shear walls.”, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Ranf, R. T., Eberhard, M. O., and Malone, S. (2007). “Post-earthquake prioritization of bridge inspections.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(1), 131–146.
Rossetto, T., Ioannou, I., and Grant, D. N. (2013). Existing empirical fragility and vulnerability relationships: Compendium and guide for selection, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Sabetta, F., Goretti, A., and Lucantoni, A. (1998). “Empirical fragility curves from damage surveys and estimated strong ground motion.” Proc., 11th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paris.
Shedid, M. T., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., and Drysdale, R. G. (2010). “Alternative strategies to enhance the seismic performance of reinforced concrete-block shear wall systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 676–689.
Shing, P. B., Noland, J. L., Spaeh, H. P., Klamerus, E. W., and Schuller, M. P., (1991). “Response of Single-Story Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls to In-Plane Lateral Loads.”, U.S.-Japan Coordinated Program for Masonry Building Research, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO.
Siyam, M., El-Dakhakhni, W., Shedid, M., and Drysdale, R. (2015). “Seismic response evaluation of ductile reinforced concrete block structural walls. I: Experimental results and force-based design parameters.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04015066.
Spence, R. J. S., Coburn, A. W., Pomonis, A., and Sakai, S. (1992). “Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale.” Proc., 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491–514.
Voon, K. C., and Ingham, J. M. (2006). “Experimental in-plane shear strength investigation of reinforced concrete masonry walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 400–408.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 143Issue 9September 2017

History

Received: Jul 21, 2016
Accepted: Feb 6, 2017
Published online: May 9, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Oct 9, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed Ezzeldin, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Lydell Wiebe, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. E-mail: [email protected]
Wael El-Dakhakhni, F.ASCE [email protected]
Martini Mascarin and George Chair in Masonry Design, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share