Abstract

The implementation of reliability methods for designing new structures and assessing the safety and evaluating the performance of existing structures and infrastructure systems has gained widespread acceptance. Consequently, reliability-based design specifications in the form of load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods have dominated the development of current codes and standards. This paper reviews the reliability-based performance criteria used to calibrate design and evaluation codes and standards for assessing the strength, serviceability, and fatigue resistance of structural components. The review shows that large differences exist in the target reliability levels adopted for evaluating the strength of various types of structural members and materials. These differences result from many factors, including (1) intended structure design and service life; (2) expected member modes of failure (e.g., ductile or brittle); (3) importance of the individual member to overall system integrity (secondary member, column, or connection); (4) experiences with previous designs; (5) material and construction costs; (6) structure type and occupancy; and (7) risk tolerance of the engineering community and the public within a code’s jurisdiction. For other than seismic hazards, current specifications remain primarily focused on the evaluation of individual structural members and components, although recently proposed performance-based design (PBD) procedures apply varying target member reliability levels that depend on structure categories, modes of failure, and required levels of structural performance. The implementation of reliability-based durability criteria in design standards is still a subject of research owing to difficulties encountered in modeling material degradation mechanisms and their interactions and in the collection and mapping of long-term site-specific data on degrading agents. Because of large epistemic uncertainties, the evaluation of the fatigue safety of structural components in engineering practice still relies on conservative basic models of damage accumulation using S-N curves or basic fracture mechanics crack growth models. Overall, reliability-calibrated structural standards are producing designs that offer a good balance between safety and cost. The future implementation of risk-based methods will further enhance the ability to meet structure-specific performance requirements set by owners and users.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper was prepared by members and friends of SEI-ASCE Task Group 2 (TG2) on Reliability-Based Structural System Performance Indicators as part of the activities of the group. Task Group 2 is a Committee of the SEI-ASCE Technical Council on Life-Cycle Performance, Safety, Reliability and Risk of Structural Systems. The purpose of TG2 is to promote the study, research, and application of reliability-based system performance indicators including structural system reliability, robustness, and redundancy.

References

AA (Aluminum Association). (2010). Aluminum design manual: Specification and guidelines for aluminum structures, ADM-2010, Arlington, VA.
AASHTO. (2002). Standard specifications for highway bridges, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2011). Manual for bridge evaluation, MBE-1-M, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2011). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-11, Chicago.
Ad Hoc Committee on Serviceability Research. (1986). “Structural serviceability: A critical appraisal and research needs.” J. Struct. Eng., 2646–2664.
AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). (2002). “Limit state design of steel frames.” Tokyo.
AISC. (1989). Manual of steel construction: Allowable stress design, Chicago.
AISC. (2011). “Steel construction manual.” Chicago.
American Wood Council. (2012). “National design specification for wood construction.”, Leesburg, VA.
Ang, H. A., and Tang, W. H. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design: Decision, risk and reliability, Wiley, New York.
Ang, H. A., and Tang, W. H. (2006). Probability concepts in engineering: Emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
API (American Petroleum Institute). (2003). “RP 2A (LRFD) recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms—Load and resistance factor design.” Washington, DC.
Arangio, S. (2012). “Reliability based approach for structural design and assessment: performance criteria and indicators in current European codes and guidelines.” Int. J. Lifecycle Perform. Eng., 1(1), 64–91.
Arangio, S., and Bontempi, F. (2010). “Soft computing based multilevel strategy for bridge integrity monitoring.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 25(5), 348–362.
ASCE/SEI. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA.
AS (Standards Australia). (2005). “General principles on reliability for structures.” AS-5104, Sydney, Australia.
Azevedo, C. P. B., and Diniz, S. M. C. (2008). “Towards life-cycle assessment of foundations of Guyed towers in electrical transmission lines.” Life-cycle civil engineering, F. Biondini and D. M. Frangopol, eds., Taylor & Francis Group, London, 703–708.
Biondini, F., and Frangopol, D. M. (2008). “Probabilistic limit analysis and lifetime prediction of concrete structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 4(5), 399–412.
BS (British Standards Institution). (2002). “Basis of structural design.” BS EN 1990, London.
CAN/CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2012). “Canadian highway bridge design code and commentary.” CAN/CSA-S6-06, Mississauga, ON.
Catbas, F. N., Susoy, M., and Frangopol, D. (2008). “Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: Long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data.” J. Eng. Struct., 30(9), 2347–2359.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (1993). “Basis of design and action on structures.” Eurocode 1, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2002). “Eurocode: Basis of design.” EN 1990, Brussels, Belgium.
Chinese Standards. (2011). “Structures GB 50068-200.” Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Building, Beijing.
Chung, H.-Y., Manuel, L., and Frank, K. H. (2006). “Optimal inspection scheduling of steel bridges using nondestructive testing techniques.” J. Bridge Eng., 305–319.
Corotis, R. B., Ellis, J. H., and Jiang, M. (2005). “Modeling of risk-based inspection, maintenance and life-cycle cost with partially observable Markov decision process.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 1(1), 75–84.
Darjani, S., Saadeghvaziri, M., and Aboobaker, N. (2010). “Serviceability considerations of high performance steel bridges.” Structures Congress 2010, ASCE, Reston, VA, 752–761.
Det Norske Veritas. (1995). “Guidelines for offshore structural reliability analysis: Examples for jacket platforms.”, Høvik, Bærum, Norway.
Det Norske Veritas. (2002). Guidelines for design of wind turbines, 2nd Ed., Høvik, Bærum, Norway.
Det Norske Veritas. (2011). “Design of offshore steel structures.” Offshore standard DNV-OS-C101, Høvik, Bærum, Norway.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2001). “Acceptable risk bases for design of structures.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 3(2), 170–179.
Ellingwood, B. R., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A. (1980). “Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
Ellingwood, B. R., MacGregor, J. G., Galambos, T. V., and Cornell, C. A. (1982). “Probability based load criteria: Load factors and load combinations.” J. Struct. Div., 108(5), 978–997.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Rosowsky, D. V. (1991). “Duration of load effects in LRFD for wood construction.” J. Struct. Eng., 584–599.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2001). “Bridge lifetime system reliability under multiple limit states.” J. Bridge Eng., 523–528.
FAA (Federal Aviation Authority). (2011). “Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structures.”, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2003). “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology.” Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2007). “Freight facts and figures.” Office of Freight Management and Operations, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Fisher, J. W., Galambos, T. V., Kulak, G. L., and Ravindra, M. K. (1978). “Load and resistance factor design criteria for connectors.” J. Struct. Div., 104(9), 1427–1441.
Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(6), 389–413.
Frangopol, D. M., Strauss, A., and Kim, S. (2008). “Bridge reliability assessment based on monitoring.” J. Bridge Eng., 258–270.
Galambos, T. V., Ellingwood, B., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, A. (1982). “Probability based load criteria: Assessment of current design practice.” J. Struct. Div., 108(5), 959–977.
Galambos, T. V., and Ellingwood, B. R. (1986). “Serviceability limit states: Deflection.” J. Struct. Eng., 67–84.
Ghosn, M., et al. (2016). “Performance indicators for structural systems and infrastructure networks.” J. Struct. Eng., in press.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. (1986). “Reliability calibration of a bridge design code.” J. Struct. Eng., 745-763.
Ghosn, M., Moses, F., and Gobieski, J. (1986). “Evaluation of steel bridges using in-service testing.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1072, 71–78.
Griffis, L. G. (1993). “Serviceability limit states under wind load.” Eng. J., 1–16.
Hossain, N. B., and Stewart, M. G. (2001). “Probabilistic models of damaging deflections for floor elements.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 135–140.
ISO. (2010). “Bases for the design of structures—Assessment of existing structures.” ISO 13822, Geneva.
JCSS (Joint Committee on Structural Safety). (2001). “Probabilistic assessment of existing structures.” RILEM.
Kayser, J. R., and Nowak, A. S. (1989). “Reliability of corroded steel girder bridges.” Struct. Saf., 6(1), 53–63.
Kissell, J. R., and Ferry, R. L. (2002). Aluminum structures: A guide to their specifications and design, Wiley, New York.
Kwon, K., Frangopol, D. M., and Soliman, M. (2012). “Probabilistic fatigue life estimation of steel bridges based on a bi-linear S-N approach.” J. Bridge Eng., 58–70.
Lange, C. H (2007). “Structural reliability methods for improved designs against fatigue.” Reliability and Maintainability Symp., 2007, RAMS ‘07, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 386–391.
Li, Q., Wang, C., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2015). “Time-dependent reliability of aging structures in the presence of non-stationary loads and degradation.” Struct. Saf., 52, 132–141.
Lutes, L. D., and Sarkani, S. (2003). Random vibrations: Analysis of structural and mechanical systems, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K.
Melchers, R. E. (1999a). Structural reliability analysis and prediction, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Melchers, R. E. (1999b). “Corrosion uncertainty modeling for steel structures.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 52(1), 3–19.
Meyer, M., et al. (2014). “Strategic issues facing transportation.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Mori, Y., and Ellingwood, B. (1993). “Reliability-based service life assessment of aging concrete structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 1600–1621.
Moses, F. (2001). “Calibration of load factors for LRFR bridge evaluation.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Moses, F., Schilling, C. G., and Raju, K. S. (1987). “Fatigue evaluation procedures for steel bridges.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Nowak, A. S. (1999). “Calibration of LRFD bridge design code.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Nowak, A. S., and Collins, K. R. (2012). Reliability of structures, 2nd Ed., CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Nowak, A. S., Szersen, M. M., Szeliga, E. K., Szwed, A., and Podhorecki, P. J. (2008). “Reliability-based calibration for structural concrete.” Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). (2010). “Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings.”, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Petrini, F., Li, H., and Bontempi, F. (2010). “Basis of design and numerical modeling of offshore wind turbines.” Struct. Eng. Mech., 36(5), 599–624.
Ravindra, M. K., and Galambos, T. V. (1978). “Load and resistance factor design for steel.” J. Struct. Div., 104(ST9), 1337–1353.
Rebba, R. H. S., Liu, Y, and Mahadevan, S. (2006). “Statistical validation of simulation models.” Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol., 25(1–3), 164–181.
Sivakumar, B., and Ghosn, M. (2011). “Recalibration of LRFR live load factors in the AASHTO manual for bridge evaluation.”, Transportation Research Board, The National Academies, Washington, DC.
Steenbergen, R. D. J. M., Geurts, C. P. W., and van Bentum, C. A. (2009). “Climate change and its impact on structural safety.” Heron, 54(1), 3–35.
Stewart, M. G. (1996). “Serviceability reliability analysis of reinforced concrete structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 794–803.
Stewart, M. G., Wang, X., and Nguyen, M. N. (2011). “Climate change impact and risks of concrete infrastructure deterioration.” Eng. Struct., 33(4), 1326–1337.
Szerszen, M. M., and Nowak, A. S. (2003). “Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318)—Part 2: Reliability analysis and resistance factors.” ACI Struct. J., 100(3), 383–391.
Takada, T., and Wang, M. (2003). “Code calibration for implementation of limit station design in Japan.” Proc., 5th Japan Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (JCOSSAR 2003), Vol. 22, Tokyo, 54–59.
Thoft-Christensen, P., and Baker, M. J. (1982). Structural reliability theory and its applications, Springer, New York.
Turkstra, C. J., and Madsen, H. O. (1980). “Load combinations in codified structural design.” J. Struct. Div., 106(12), 2527–2543.
U.S. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). (2002). “Natural phenomena hazards design and evaluation criteria for department of energy facilities.”, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC.
Vidal, T., Castel, A., and Francois, R. (2007). “Corrosion process and structural performance of a 17 year old reinforced concrete beam stored in chloride environment.” Cem. Concr. Res., 37(11), 1551–1561.
Wisniewski, D., Casas, J. R., and Ghosn, M. (2012). “Codes for safety assessment of existing bridges—Current state and further development.”, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142Issue 9September 2016

History

Received: May 19, 2014
Accepted: Feb 18, 2016
Published online: Jun 2, 2016
Published in print: Sep 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Nov 2, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. Ghosn, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York/CUNY, New York 10031 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
D. M. Frangopol, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
The Fazlur R. Khan Endowed Chair Professor of Structural Engineering and Architecture, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA 18015. E-mail: [email protected]
T. P. McAllister, M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Structural Engineer, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. E-mail: [email protected]
M. Shah, F.ASCE [email protected]
Shah Associates, 10 Alderwood Ln., Syosset, NY 11791. E-mail: [email protected]
S. M. C. Diniz, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Federal Univ. of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]
B. R. Ellingwood, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Distinguished Professor, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. E-mail: [email protected]
L. Manuel, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, George and Dawn L. Coleman Centennial Fellow in Engineering, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1068. E-mail: [email protected]
F. Biondini, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
N. Catbas, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816. E-mail: [email protected]
A. Strauss, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Natural Hazards, Univ. of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1190 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: [email protected]
X. L. Zhao, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Monash Univ., VIC 3800, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share