Technical Papers
Apr 27, 2016

Behavior of Sandwich Panels in a Deployable Structure

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 10

Abstract

This paper investigates the load-bearing capability of sandwich panels (composed of fiber-reinforced polymer faces and a foam core) connected by aluminum hinges in an origami-inspired deployable structure intended for temporary sheltering. The structure is studied (1) during deployment (loaded under self-weight only), and (2) as both individual and combined modules subjected to uniform pressures emulating wind loads. The measured results are used to validate finite element models, with comparisons focusing on surface strains and displacements at panel centers (to study global behavior), as well as surface strains near connections (to study local behavior). The validated numerical models are used to perform parametric studies investigating design decisions for (1) deployment, including panel reinforcement, location of lifting equipment, and size of lifting equipment, and (2) combined modules, including restraints and connections between modules, gasketing between panels, and panel reinforcement. This research ultimately demonstrates the load-bearing capability of deployable structures composed of hinged sandwich panels and provides design guidelines and recommendations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC) under Contract W911QY-12-C-0128. The authors are grateful for the assistance of laboratory technician Brent Bach and students Chad Quaglia, Casey Casias, Angelene Dascanio, and Jack Reilly. The authors would like to thank Lyman-Morse Boatbuilding Co. (Thomaston, Maine) for manufacturing the prototype. The authors would like to acknowledge the other principal investigators on this project, including Mihir Sen, Panos Antsaklis, Ann-Marie Conrado, and Samuel Paolucci, and project coordinators Patrick Murphy and Mike Zenk. This research was supported in part by the University of Notre Dame Center for Research Computing through computational resources.

References

ABAQUS version 6.13 [Computer software]. Dassault Systemes, Waltham, MA.
Abbadi, A., Koutsawa, Y., Carmasol, A., Belouettar, S., and Azari, Z. (2009). “Experimental and numerical characterization of honeycomb sandwich composite panels.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory, 17(10), 1533–1547.
Aluminum Association. (2005). Aluminum design manual: Specifications and guidelines for aluminum structures, Arlington, VA.
Anderson, S. M. (2011). “Save energy, save our troops.” 〈http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/opinion/13anderson.html?_r=0〉 (Jun. 5, 2014).
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-10, Reston, VA.
ASTM. (2008). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” ASTM D3039/D3039M-08, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.” ASTM D638-10, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011a). “Standard test method for core shear properties of sandwich constructions by beam flexure.” ASTM C393/C393M-11, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011b). “Standard test method for density of sandwich core materials.” ASTM C271/C271M-11, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011c). “Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores.” ASTM C365/C365M-11a, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard practice for determining sandwich beam flexural and shear stiffness.” ASTM D7250/D7250M-06, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2013). “Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement.” ASTM D792-13, West Conshohocken, PA.
Ballard, Z. C., Thrall, A. P., Smith, B. J., and Casias, C. M. (2016). “Impact of hinged connectors on sandwich panel behavior.” J. Struct. Eng., 06015005.
Bunyawanichakul, P., Castanie, B., and Barrau, J. J. (2005). “Experimental and numerical analysis of inserts in sandwich panels.” Appl. Compos. Mater., 12(3–4), 177–191.
Charleston Marine Containers. (2011). “Tricons.” 〈http://www.cmci.com/Tricons.aspx〉 (Nov. 17, 2013).
Clean Seal. (2015). “Miscellaneous sections.” 〈http://www.cleanseal.com/miscellaneous-sections.html〉 (Apr. 30, 2015).
Compliance Packaging International. (2013). “463L pallets.” 〈http://www.463lpallet.com/〉 (Jun. 5, 2014).
Daniel, I. M., and Abot, J. L. (2000). “Fabrication, testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams.” Compos. Sci. Technol., 60(12–13), 2455–2463.
Dawood, M., and Peirick III, L. (2013). “Connection development and in-plane response of glass fiber reinforced polymer sandwich panels with reinforced cores.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 40(11), 1117–1126.
De Matteis, G., and Landolfo, R. (1999a). “Mechanical fasteners for cladding sandwich panels: Interpretative models for shear behaviour.” Thin-Walled Struct., 35(1), 61–79.
De Matteis, G., and Landolfo, R. (1999b). “Structural behaviour of sandwich panel shear walls: An experimental analysis.” Mater. Struct., 32(5), 331–341.
Demelio, G., Genovese, K., and Pappalettere, C. (2001). “An experimental investigation of static and fatigue behavior of sandwich composite panels joined by fasteners.” Composites Part B, 32(4), 299–308.
El-Chiti, F. (2005). “Experimental variability of e-glass reinforced vinyl ester composites fabricated by vartm/scrimp.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME.
Gurit. (2013). “Corecell M-foam—The marine foam.” 〈http://www.gurit.com/files/documents/corecell-m-foamv5pdf.pdf〉 (Oct. 9, 2013).
Heimbs, S., and Pein, M. (2009). “Failure behavior of honeycomb sandwich corner joints and inserts.” Compos. Struct., 89(4), 575–588.
Kee Paik, J., Thayamballi, A. K., and Kim, G. S. (1999). “Strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels.” Thin-Walled Struct., 35(3), 205–231.
Kesler, O., and Gibson, L. J. (2002). “Size effects in metallic foam core sandwich beams.” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, A326(2), 228–234.
Malcom, A. J., Aronson, M. T., Deshpande, V. S., and Wadley, H. N. G. (2013). “Compressive response of glass fiber composite sandwich structures.” Composites Part A, 54, 88–97.
Mamalis, A. G., Manolakos, D. E., Ioannidis, M. B., and Papapostolou, D. P. (2005). “On the crushing response of composite sandwich panels subjected to edgewise compression: Experimental.” Compos. Struct., 71(2), 246–257.
Manalo, A. C., Aravinthan, T., Karunasena, W., and Islam, M. M. (2010). “Flexural behaviour of structural fibre composite sandwich beams in flatwise and edgewise positions.” Compos. Struct., 92(4), 984–995.
Martinez-Martin, F. J., and Thrall, A. P. (2014). “Honeycomb core sandwich panels for origami-inspired deployable shelters: Multi-objective optimization for minimum weight and maximum energy efficiency.” Eng. Struct., 69, 158–167.
Peraza-Hernandez, E. A., Hartl, D. J., Malak Jr., R. J., and Lougads, D. C. (2014). “Origami-inspired actives structures: A synthesis and review.” Smart Mater. Struct., 23(9), 094001.
Quaglia, C. P., Dascanio, A. J., and Thrall, A. P. (2014a). “Bascule shelters: A novel erection strategy for origami-inspired structures.” Eng. Struct., 75, 276–287.
Quaglia, C. P., Yu, N., Thrall, A. P., and Paolucci, S. (2014b). “Balancing energy efficiency and structural performance through multi-objective shape optimization: Case study of a rapidly deployable origami-inspired shelter.” Energy Build., 82, 733–745.
Russo, A., and Zuccarello, B. (2007). “Experimental and numerical evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of GFRP sandwich panels.” Compos. Struct., 81(4), 575–586.
U.S. Army Integrated Logistics Support Center. (2013). “Force provider.” 〈http://ilsc.natick.army.mil/forceprovider.htm〉 (Nov. 17, 2013).
Vectorply. (2002). “Laminated properties and packaging.” 〈http://www.vectorply.com/ri-laminateprop.html〉 (Nov. 29, 2014).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142Issue 10October 2016

History

Received: May 15, 2015
Accepted: Feb 9, 2016
Published online: Apr 27, 2016
Discussion open until: Sep 27, 2016
Published in print: Oct 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zach C. Ballard [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Kinetic Structures Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, 228 Cushing Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]
Evan J. Gerbo, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Kinetic Structures Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, 228 Cushing Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]
Ashley P. Thrall, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Myron and Rosemary Noble Assistant Professor of Structural Engineering, Kinetic Structures Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, 159 Fitzpatrick Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Brian J. Smith [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Teaching Professor and Research Engineer, Kinetic Structures Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, 228 Cushing Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share