Technical Papers
Nov 4, 2015

Direct Differentiation of the Particle Finite-Element Method for Fluid–Structure Interaction

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 3

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis of fluid–structure interaction (FSI) provides an important tool for assessing the reliability and performance of coastal infrastructure subjected to storm and tsunami hazards. As a preliminary step for gradient-based applications in reliability, optimization, system identification, and performance-based engineering of coastal infrastructure, the direct differentiation method (DDM) is applied to FSI simulations using the particle finite-element method (PFEM). The DDM computes derivatives of FSI response with respect to uncertain design and modeling parameters of the structural and fluid domains that are solved in a monolithic system via the PFEM. Geometric nonlinearity of the free surface fluid flow is considered in the governing equations of the DDM along with sensitivity of material and geometric nonlinear response in the structural domain. The analytical derivatives of elemental matrices and vectors with respect to element properties are evaluated and implemented in an open source finite element software framework. Examples involving both hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loading show that the sensitivity of nodal displacements, pressures, and forces computed by the finite-difference method (FDM) converge to the DDM for simple beam models as well as for a reinforced-concrete frame structure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0847055. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

Arnold, D., Brezzi, F., and Fortin, M. (1984). “A stable finite element for the Stokes equations.” Math. Stat., 21(4), 337–344.
Baiges, J., and Codina, R. (2010). “The fixed-mesh ale approach applied to solid mechanics and fluid-structure interaction problems.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 81(2), 1529–1557.
Bank, R. E. and Welfert, B. D. (1990). “A comparison between the mini-element and the Petrov-Galerkin formulations for the generalized stokes problem.” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 83(1), 61–68.
Bebamzadeh, A., Haukaas, T., Vaziri, R., Poursartip, A., and Fernlund, G. (2010). “Application of response sensitivity in composite processing.” J. Compos. Mater., 44(15), 1821–1840.
Brezzi, F., and Fortin, M. (1991). Mixed and hybrid finite element methods, Springer, New York.
Chock, G., Carden, L., Robertson, I., Olsen, M., and Yu, G. (2013). “Tohoku tsunami-induced building failure analysis with implications for U.S. tsunami and seismic design codes.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(S1), S99–S126.
Chock, G. Y. K., Robertson, I., and Riggs, H. R. (2011). “Tsunami structural design provisions for a new update of building codes and performance-based engineering.” ASCE solutions of coastal disasters (COPRI), Anchorage, AK, 423–435.
Conte, J. P., Barbato, M., and Spacone, E. (2004). “Finite element response sensitivity analysis using force-based frame models.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 59(13), 1781–1820.
Conte, J. P., Vijalapura, P. K., and Meghalla, M. (2003). “Consistent finite-element response sensitivity analysis.” J. Eng. Mech., 1380–1393.
Crisfield, M. A. (1991). Non-linear finite element analysis of solids and structures, Vol. 1, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Donea, J., and Huerta, A. (2003). Finite element methods for flow problems, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Franchin, P. (2004). “Reliability of uncertain inelastic structures under earthquake excitation.” J. Eng. Mech., 180–191.
Fujimura, K., and Kiureghian, A. D. (2007). “Tail-equivalent linearization method for nonlinear random vibration.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 22(1), 63–76.
Girault, V., and Raviart, P. (1986). Finite element methods for Navier-Stokes equations, Springer, Berlin.
Gresho, P. M. (1998). Incompressible flow and the finite element method: Advection-diffusion and isothermal laminar flow, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Gu, Q., Barbato, M., Conte, J. P., Gill, P., and McKenna, F. (2012). “OpenSees-SNOPT framework for finite-element-based optimization of structural and geotechnical systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 822–834.
Gunzburger, M. (1989). Finite element methods for viscous incompressible flows, Academic Press, San Diego.
Guo, Q. and Jeffers, A. E. (2014). “Direct differentiation method for response sensitivity analysis of structures in fire.” Eng. Struct, 77, 172–180.
Haukaas, T., and Scott, M. H. (2006). “Shape sensitivities in the reliability analysis of nonlinear frame structures.” Comput. Struct., 84(15–16), 964–977.
Kleiber, M., Antunez, H., Hien, T., and Kowalczyk, P. (1997). Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Lee, M., Chung, S., Jang, S., and Joun, M. (2009). “Three-dimensional simulation of forging using tetrahedral and hexahedral elements.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 45(11), 745–754.
Madurapperuma, M. A. K. M., and Wijeyewickrema, A. C. (2012). “Inelastic dynamic analysis of an RC building impacted by a tsunami water-borne shipping container.” J. Earthquake Tsunami, 6(1), 1250001.
Marti, J., Ryzhakov, P., Idelsohn, S., and Oñate, E. (2012). “Combined Eulerian—PFEM approach for analysis of polymers in fire situations.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 92(9), 782–801.
Matsumoto, J. (2005). “A relationship between stabilized fem and bubble function element stabilization method with orthogonal basis for incompressible flows.” J. Appl. Mech., 8, 233–242.
McAllister, T. (2014). “The performance of essential facilities in Superstorm Sandy.” ASCE Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2269–2281.
Nakajima, S., and Kawahara, M. (2010). “New finite element formulation based on bubble function interpolation for the transient compressible euler equations.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Eng., 26(8), 1030–1049.
Oñate, E., Celigueta, M., Idelsohn, S., Salazar, F., and Suárez, B. (2011). “Possibilities of the particle finite element method for fluid–soil–structure interaction problems.” Comput. Mech., 48(3), 307–318.
Oñate, E., García, J., Idelsohn, S., and Pin, F. D. (2006). “Finite calculus formulations for finite element analysis of incompressible flows. Eulerian, ALE and Lagrangian approaches.” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 195(23–24), 3001–3037.
Oñate, E., Idelsohn, S., Pin, F. D., and Aubry, R. (2004). “The particle finite element method. an overview.” Int. J. Comput. Meth., 1(2), 267–307.
OpenSees version 2.4.6 [Computer software]. UC regents, Berkeley, CA.
Pierre, R. (1995). “Optimal selection of the bubble function in the stabilization of the P1-P1 element for the Stokes problem.” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 32(4), 1210–1224.
Radovitzky, R., and Ortiz, M. (1998). “Lagrangian finite element analysis of Newtonian fluid flows.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 43(4), 607–619.
Scott, M. H., and Filippou, F. C. (2007). “Exact response gradients for large displacement nonlinear beam-column elements.” J. Struct. Eng., 155–165.
Scott, M. H., Franchin, P., Fenves, G. L., and Filippou, F. C. (2004). “Response sensitivity for nonlinear beam-column elements.” J. Struct. Eng., 1281–1288.
Scott, M. H., and Haukaas, T. (2008). “Software framework for parameter updating and finite-element response sensitivity analysis.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 281–291.
Tezduyar, T., Mittal, S., Ray, S., and Shih, R. (1992). “Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements.” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 95(2), 221–242.
Zhu, M., and Scott, M. H. (2014a). “Improved fractional step method for simulating fluid-structure interaction using the pfem.” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 99(12), 925–944.
Zhu, M., and Scott, M. H. (2014b). “Modeling fluid-structure interaction by the particle finite element method in OpenSees.” Comput. Struct., 132, 12–21.
Zienkiewicz, O., Taylor, R., and Zhu, J. (2005). The finite element method: Its basis and fundamentals, 6th Ed., Vol. 1, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 142Issue 3March 2016

History

Received: Dec 31, 2014
Accepted: Aug 25, 2015
Published online: Nov 4, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Apr 4, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331. E-mail: [email protected]
Michael H. Scott, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share