Deployment of a Tensegrity Footbridge
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 11
Abstract
Deployable structures are structures that transform their shape from a compact state to an extended in-service position. Structures composed of tension elements that surround compression elements in equilibrium are called tensegrity structures. Tensegrities are good candidates for deployable structures since shape transformations occur by changing lengths of elements at low energy costs. Although the tensegrity concept was first introduced in 1948, few full-scale tensegrity-based structures have been built. Previous work has demonstrated that a tensegrity ring topology is potentially a viable system for a deployable footbridge. This paper describes a study of a near-full-scale deployable tensegrity footbridge. The study has been carried out both numerically and experimentally. The deployment of two modules (one half of the footbridge) is achieved through changing the length of five active cables. Deployment is aided by energy stored in low stiffness spring elements. Self-weight significantly influences deployment, and deployment is not reproducible using the same sequence of cable-length changes. Active control is thus required for accurate positioning of front nodes in order to complete deployment through joining both sides at center span. Additionally, testing and numerical analyses have revealed that the deployment behavior of the structure is nonlinear with respect to cable-length changes. Finally, modeling the behavior of the structure cannot be done accurately using friction-free and dimensionless joints. Similar deployable tensegrity structures of class two and higher are expected to require simulation models that include joint dimensions for accurate prediction of nodal positions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank the Swiss National Science Foundation for supporting this work through contact number 200020_144305. This work is a continuation of a study that was initiated in collaboration with Professor René Motro, University of Montpellier, France. We thank S. D. Guest for discussions related to spring elements. Finally, we thank Patrice Gallay, Charles Gilliard, and Alain Herzog for their contributions.
References
Adam, B., and Smith, I. F. C. (2008). “Reinforcement learning for structural control.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 133–139.
Argyris, J. H., and Scharpf, D. W. (1972). “Large deflection analysis of prestressed networks.” J. Struct. Div., 98(3), 633–654.
Ashwear, N., and Eriksson, A. (2014). “Natural frequencies describe the pre-stress in tensegrity structures.” Comput. Struct., 138(1), 162–171.
Barnes, M. R. (1999). “Form finding and analysis of tension structures by dynamic relaxation.” Int. J. Space Struct., 14(2), 89–104.
Bel Hadj Ali, N., Rhode-Barbarigos, L., and Smith, I. F. C. (2010). “Design optimization and dynamic analysis of a tensegrity based footbridge.” Eng. Struct., 32(11), 3650–3659.
Bel Hadj Ali, N., Rhode-Barbarigos, L., and Smith, I. F. C. (2011). “Analysis of clustered tensegrity structures using a modified dynamic relaxation algorithm.” Int. J. Solid. Struct., 48(5), 637–647.
Cevaer, F., Quirant, J., and Dubé, J.-F. (2012). “Mechanical behaviour in compression of a foldable tensegrity ring: Parametric study and rheological model.” Int. J. Space Struct. , 27(2), 107–115.
Dalil Safaei, S., Eriksson, A., Micheletti, A., and Tibert, G. (2013). “Study of various tensegrity modules as building blocks for slender booms.” Int. J. Space Struct., 28(1), 41–52.
Domer, B., and Smith, I. F. C. (2005). “An active structure that learns.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 16–24.
Domer, D. (2003). “Performance enhancement of active structures during service lives.” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fest, E., Shea, K., and Smith, I. F. C. (2004). “Active tensegrity structure.” J. Struct. Eng., 1454–1465.
Furuya, H. (1992). “Concept of deployable tensegrity structures in space applications.” Int. J. Space Struct., 7(2), 143–151.
Furuya, H., Nakahara, M., Murata, S., Jodoi, D., Terada, Y., and Takadama, K. (2006). “Concept of inflatable tensegrity for large space structures.” Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf., Collection of Technical Papers-AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 1322–1330.
Guest, S. D. (2006). “The stiffness of prestressed frameworks: A unifying approach.” Int. J. Solid. Struct., 43(3–4), 842–854.
Michelleti, A., and Williams, W. O., (2007). “A marching procedure for form-finding for tensegrity structures.” J. Mech. Mater. Struct., 2(5), 857–882.
Moored, K. W., and Bart-Smith, H. (2009). “Investigation of clustered actuation in tensegrity structures.” Int. J. Solid. Structures, 46(17), 3272–3281.
Motro, R., Maurin, B., and Silvestri, C. (2006). “Tensegrity rings and the hollow rope.” IASS Symp., New Olympics, New Shells and Spatial Structures, International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, Madrid, Spain, 470–471.
Motro, R., and Raducanu, W. (2003). “Tensegrity systems.” Int. J. Space Struct., 18(2), 77–84.
Murakami, H. (2001). “Static and dynamic analyses of tensegrity structures. Part I. Nonlinear equations of motion.” Int. J. Solid. Struct., 38(20), 3599–3613.
Nguyen, A. D., Quirant, J., Cevaer, F., and Dubé, J.-F. (2011). “Study and construction of a pentagon-based tensegrity ring.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., 15(6), 849–868.
Pellegrino, S., and Calladine, C. R. (1986). “Matrix analysis of statically and kinematically indeterminate frameworks.” Int. J. Solid. Struct., 22(4), 409–428.
Pugh, A. (1976). An introduction to tensegrity, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Rhode-Barbarigos, L., Bel Hadj Ali, N., Motro, R., and Smith, I. F. C. (2012a). “Design aspects of a deployable tensegrity-hollow-rope footbridge.” Int. J. Space Struct., 27(2), 81–96.
Rhode-Barbarigos, L., Bel Hadj Ali, N., and Smith, I. F. C. (2010). “Designing tensegrity modules for pedestrian bridges.” Eng. Struct., 32(4), 1158–1167.
Rhode-Barbarigos, L., Schulin, C., Bel Hadj Ali, N., Motro, R., and Smith, I. F. C. (2012b). “Mechanism-based approach for the deployment of a tensegrity-ring module.” J. Struct. Eng., 539–548.
Schenk, M., Guest, S. D., and Herder, J. L. (2007). “Zero stiffness tensegrity structures.” Int. J. Solid. Struct., 44(20), 6569–6583.
Skelton, R. E., Adhikari, R., Pinaud, J., Chan, W., and Helton, J. W. (2001). “An introduction to the mechanics of tensegrity structures.” Proc., IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 4254–4259.
Skelton, R. E., Fraternali, F., Carpentieri, G., and Micheletti, A. (2014). “Minimum mass design of tensegrity bridges with parametric architecture and multiscale complexity.” Mech. Res. Commun., 58, 124–132.
Tibert, A. G., and Pellegrino, S. (2003). “Review of form-finding methods for tensegrity structures.” Int. J. Space Struct., 18(4), 209–223.
Tibert, G. (2002). “Deployable tensegrity structures for space applications.” Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Zolesi, V. S., et al. (2012). “On an innovative deployment concept for large space structures.” Proc., 42nd Int. Conf. on Environmental Systems, San Diego.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141 • Issue 11 • November 2015
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 26, 2014
Accepted: Jan 5, 2015
Published online: Feb 10, 2015
Discussion open until: Jul 10, 2015
Published in print: Nov 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.