Technical Papers
Mar 9, 2015

Multiphase Performance Assessment of Structural Response to Seismic Excitations

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 11

Abstract

An alternative approach to the traditional method for performance assessment of structural systems is proposed. Denoted herein as the M-PARS method, this new approach is capable of tackling clusters of structural behavior under seismic excitations from one hazard level to another due to, for example, variations in the nature of excitation characteristics. The method’s ability to recognize and process different clusters (i.e., phases) separately enables it to yield performance estimates with higher accuracy and less variability. The proposed M-PARS methodology is a step up compared to existing state-of-the-art (albeit conventional monophase) approaches. In the present study, M-PARS is first formulated in general terms, and then applied to a specific case study involving bridges with skew-angled seat-type abutments to demonstrate its salient features. In this study, the sensitivities of the median estimates of seismic response to variations in bridge geometry parameters and ground motion characteristics are investigated, and direct comparisons are made with a conventional monophase method to quantify the advantages afforded by the proposed method.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is based on work supported by the PEER Transportation Research Program under Grant No. UCLA-45782. This financial support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of sponsors.

References

Abrams, D. P. (2002). “Consequence-based engineering approaches for reducing loss in mid-America.” Linbeck Distinguished Lecture Series in Earthquake Engineering, Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
Aslani, H., and Miranda, E. (2005). “Fragility assessment of slab-column connections in existing non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings.” J. Earthquake Eng., 9(6), 777–804.
Baker, J. W. (2011). “Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground motion selection.” J. Struct. Eng., 322–331.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). “Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1077–1095.
Baker, J. W., and Jayaram, N. (2008). “Correlation of spectral acceleration values from NGA ground motion models.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 299–317.
Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y. (2008). “NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s.” Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 139–171.
Cornell, C., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R., and Foutch, D. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 526–533.
Cornell, C. A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000). “Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment.” PEER Center News 2000, 3(2), 1–2.
Dutta, A., and Mander, J. B. (1998). “Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges, INCEDE-MCEER center-to-center.” Proc., Center-to-Center Workshop on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers in Transport Systems, Tokyo.
Elefante, L., Jalayer, F., Iervolino, I., and Manfredi, G. (2010). “Disaggregation-based response weighting scheme for seismic risk assessment of structures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 30(12), 1513–1527.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2009). “Quantification of building seismic performance factors.”, Washington, DC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2013). “Seismic performance assessment of buildings.”, Washington, DC.
Field, E. H., Jordan, T. H., and Cornell, C. A. (2003). “OpenSHA: A developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 74(4), 406–419.
Hutchinson, T. C., Chai, Y. H., and Boulanger, R. W. (2004). “Inelastic seismic response of extended pile-shaft-supported bridge structures.” Earthquake Spectra, 20(4), 1057–1080.
Jalayer, F. (2003). “Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: Implementing non-linear dynamic assessments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Jalayer, F., and Cornell, C. A. (2009). “Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(8), 951–972.
Japan Road Association. (1996). “Design specification for highway bridges.” Part V: Seismic design, Tokyo.
Jayaram, N., Shahi, S., and Baker, J. (2010). “Ground motion for PEER transportation research program.” 〈http://peer.berekeley.edu/transportation/gm_peer_transportation.html〉.
Kaviani, P. (2011). “Performance-based seismic assessment of skewed bridges.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA.
Kaviani, P., Zareian, F., and Taciroglu, E. (2012). “Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete bridges with skew-angled seat-type abutments.” Eng. Struct., 45, 137–150.
Kotsoglou, A., and Pantazopoulou, S. (2010). “Response simulation and seismic assessment of highway overcrossings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(9), 991–1013.
Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Krawinkler, H., ed. (2005). “Van Nuys hotel building testbed report: Exercising seismic performance assessment.”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, Berkeley, CA.
Krawinkler, H., and Miranda, E. (2004). “Performance-based earthquake engineering.” Chapter 9, Earthquake engineering: From engineering seismology to performance-based engineering, V. V. Bertero and Y. Bozorgnia, eds., CRC Press, FL, 9.1–9.59.
Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B. (2007). “Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limit states.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1953–1971.
Mackie, K., Wong, J., and Stojadinovic, B. (2008). “Integrated probabilistic performance-based evaluation of benchmark reinforced concrete bridges.”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., and Scott, M. H. (2000). “Open system for earthquake engineering simulation.” Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA, 〈http://opensees.berkeley.edu〉.
Moschonas, I. F., Kappos, A. J., Panetsos, P., Papadopoulos, V., Makarios, T., and Thanopoulos, P. (2009). “Seismic fragility curves for Greek bridges: Methodology and case studies.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 7(2), 439–468.
Ramirez, C. M., and Miranda, E. (2012). “Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(11), 1477–1493.
Shamsabadi, A., Khalili-Tehrani, P., Stewart, J. P., and Taciroglu, E. (2010). “Validated simulation models for lateral response of bridge abutments with typical backfills.” J. Bridge Eng., 302–311.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491–514.
Yang, T. Y., Moehle, J., Stojadinovic, B., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2009). “Seismic performance evaluation of facilities: Methodology and implementation.” J. Struct. Eng., 1146–1154.
Zareian, F., and Krawinkler, H. (2007). “Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1901–1914.
Zareian, F., and Krawinkler, H. (2010). “Structural system parameter selection based on collapse potential of buildings in earthquakes.” J. Struct. Eng., 933–943.
Zareian, F., and Krawinkler, H. (2012). “Conceptual performance-based seismic design using building-level and story-level decision support system.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(11), 1439–1453.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141Issue 11November 2015

History

Received: Jul 31, 2013
Accepted: Nov 13, 2014
Published online: Mar 9, 2015
Discussion open until: Aug 9, 2015
Published in print: Nov 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Farzin Zareian, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California—Irvine, CA 92808 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Peyman Kaviani, M.ASCE [email protected]
Former Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California—Irvine, CA 92808. E-mail: [email protected]
Ertugrul Taciroglu, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California—Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail: [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share