Technical Papers
Nov 20, 2014

Stiffness-Based Design for Mitigation of Residual Displacements of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 9

Abstract

Buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs) are often used as primary seismic force resisting systems to achieve the desired seismic performance of building frames. However, significant residual displacements of these systems may cause concerns on their postearthquake performance, especially under long duration earthquakes and strong aftershocks. Although backup moment frames (MFs) along with the BRBFs, referred to as dual systems, can be used to mitigate their residual interstory drifts, there is no design criterion on how to determine the section sizes in the MF for this purpose. In the research reported in this paper, a simple mitigation technique was developed, which relies on a stiffness-based design in which the residual interstory drifts can be effectively controlled by increasing the elastic story stiffness using column sections with a higher moment of inertia. Nonlinear time-history analyses were carried out on low-to-high rise BRBFs for a set of 20 design basis earthquake (DBE) level ground motions to evaluate their residual interstory drift response for both pinned and rigid beam-to-column connections. Based on these analytical results, a simple expression is also proposed for predicting the residual drift ratios of low-to-high rise BRBFs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AISC. (2005). “Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings.”, Chicago.
AISC. (2011). “Steel construction manual.”, 14th Ed., Chicago.
Ariyaratana, C., and Fahnestock, L. A. (2011). “Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength.” Eng. Struct., 33(1), 77–89.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.”, Reston, VA.
Bates, B. R. (2002). RISA-2D educational version-1.0, RISA Technologies, Foothill Ranch, CA.
Black, C. J., Makris, N., and Aiken, I. D. (2002). “Component testing, stability analysis and characterization of buckling restrained ‘unbonded’ braces.” Rep. TR-Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center 2002/08, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
CSI (Computers and Structures). (2006). “PERFORM-3D-nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3D-structures.” User guide, version-4, Berkeley, CA.
Erochko, J., Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R., and Choi, H. (2011). “Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05.” J. Struct. Eng., 589–599.
Fahnestock, L. A., Ricles, J. M., and Sause, R. (2007). “Experimental evaluation of a large-scale buckling-restrained braced frame.” J. Struct. Eng., 1205–1214.
Fahnestock, L. A., Sause, R., and Ricles, J. M. (2006). “Analytical and large-scale experimental studies of earthquake-resistant buckling restrained braced frame systems.” Rep. TR-Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems (ATLSS) 06-01, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA.
Ghowsi, A. F., and Sahoo, D. R. (2013). “Seismic performance of buckling-restrained braced frames with varying beam-column connections.” Inter. J. Steel Struct., 13(4), 607–621.
Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H. (1999). “Prediction of seismic demands for SMRFs with ductile connections and elements.”, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.
Huang, Y. C., and Tsai, K. C. (2002). “Experimental responses of large-scale buckling-restrained braced frames.”, Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, National Taiwan Univ., Taiwan (in Chinese).
ICC (International Code Council). (2006). International building code, Whittier, CA.
Ji, X., Kato, M., Wang, T., Hitaka, T., and Nakashima, M. (2009). “Effect of gravity columns on mitigation of drift concentration for braced frames.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(12), 2148–2156.
Kiggins, S., and Uang, C. M. (2006). “Reducing residual interstory drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system.” Eng. Struct., 28(11), 1525–1532.
MacRae, G. A., Kimura, Y., and Roeder, C. (2004). “Effect of column stiffness on braced frame seismic behavior.” J. Struct. Eng., 381–391.
Magnusson, J. D. (1997). “Earthquake-resisting dual systems and the 25% rule.” Proc., Structures Congress, The Structural Engineering Institute of ASCE, New York, 124–129.
McCormick, J., Aburano, H., Ikenaga, M., and Nakashima, M. (2008). “Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements.” Proc., World Conf. on Earthquake Eng., Seismological Press, Beijing.
Merritt, S., Uang, C. M., and Benzoni, G. (2003). “Subassemblage testing of star seismic buckling-restrained braces.”, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California, La Jolla, CA.
Miranda, E., and Ramirez, C. M. (2010). “Influence of residual displacements on building loss estimation.” Proc., U.S. National and Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Oakland, CA.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). (2011). PEER ground motion database, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
PERFORM-3D version 4 [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA, Computers and Structures.
Pettinga, D., Christopoulos, C., Pampanin, S., and Priestley, N. (2007). “Effectiveness of simple approaches in mitigating residual deformations in buildings.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(12), 1763–1783.
Priestley, M. J. N. (2003). “Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering, revisited.” Proc., 9th MalletMilne Lecture, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
Prinz, G. (2007). “Impact of beam splicing on seismic response of buckling restrained braced frames.” M.S. thesis, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT.
Richards, P. W. (2009). “Seismic column demands in ductile braced frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 33–41.
RISA-2D version 13 [Computer software]. Foothill Ranch, CA, RISA Technologies.
Ruiz-Garcĭa, J., and Miranda, E. (2006). “Evaluation of residual drift demands in regular multi-storey frames for performance-based seismic assessment.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(13), 1609–1629.
Sabelli, R., Mahin, S. A., and Chang, C. (2003). “Seismic demands on steel braced-frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces.” Eng. Struct., 25(5), 655–666.
Sahoo, D. R., and Chao, S-H. (2010). “Performance-based plastic design method for buckling-restrained braced frames.” Eng. Struct., 32(9), 2950–2958.
Somerville, P. G., Smith, M., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, J. (1997). “Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project.”, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.
Tremblay, R., Lacerte, M., and Christopoulos, C. (2008). “Seismic response of multistory buildings with self-centering energy dissipative steel braces.” J. Struct. Eng., 108–120.
Tsai, K. C., Hsiao, B. C., Lai, J. W., Chen, C. H., Lin, M. L., and Weng, Y. T. (2003). “Pseudo dynamic experimental response of a full scale CFT/BRB composite frame.” Proc., Joint National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE)/Joint Research Center (JRC) Workshop on Int. Collaboration on Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research, NCREE, Taiwan.
Usami, T., Kasai, A., and Kato, M. (2003). “Behavior of buckling-restrained brace members.” Behavior of steel structures in seismic areas, F. Mazzolani, ed., Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers, The Netherlands, 211–216.
Watanabe, A., Hitomi, Y., Saeki, E., Wada, A., and Fujimoto, M. (1988). “Properties of brace encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tube.” Proc., World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, IAEE, Tokyo.
Wigle, V. R., and Fahnestock, L. A. (2010). “Buckling-restrained braced frame connection performance.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(1), 65–74.
Yeo, G. L., and Cornell, C. A. (2005). “Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering.”, John A. Blume Eaerthquake Engineering Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141Issue 9September 2015

History

Received: Feb 11, 2014
Accepted: Oct 10, 2014
Published online: Nov 20, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 20, 2015
Published in print: Sep 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dipti Ranjan Sahoo [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology at Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Shih-Ho Chao, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share