Open access
Technical Papers
Jul 15, 2014

Assessment of the Strengthening of an RC Railway Bridge with CFRP Utilizing a Full-Scale Failure Test and Finite-Element Analysis

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 1

Abstract

A finite element (FE) model was calibrated using the data obtained from a full-scale test to failure of a 50 year old reinforced concrete (RC) railway bridge. The model was then used to assess the effectiveness of various strengthening schemes to increase the load-carrying capacity of the bridge. The bridge was a two-span continuous single-track trough bridge with a total length of 30 m, situated in Örnsköldsvik in northern Sweden. It was tested in situ as the bridge had been closed following the construction of a new section of the railway line. The test was planned to evaluate and calibrate models to predict the load-carrying capacity of the bridge and assess the strengthening schemes originally developed by the European research project called Sustainable bridges. The objective of the test was to investigate shear failure, rather than bending failure for which good calibrated models are already available. To that end, the bridge was strengthened in flexure before the test using near-surface mounted square section carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bars. The ultimate failure mechanism turned into an interesting combination of bending, shear, torsion, and bond failures at an applied load of 11.7 MN (2,630 kips). A computer model was developed using specialized software to represent the response of the bridge during the test. It was calibrated using data from the test and was then used to calculate the actual capacity of the bridge in terms of train loading using the current Swedish load model which specifies a 330 kN (74 kips) axle weight. These calculations show that the unstrengthened bridge could sustain a load 4.7 times greater than the current load requirements (which is over six times the original design loading), whilst the strengthened bridge could sustain a load 6.5 times greater than currently required. Comparisons are also made with calculations using codes from Canada, Europe, and the United States.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge support and contributions from our partners and collaborators in the Sustainable Bridges Project (www.sustainablebridges.net): the European Union 6th Framework Program; Banverket, Sweden; The Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Germany; Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden; City University, U.K.; Cervenka Consulting, Czech Republic; COWI A/S, Denmark; Design Projektsamverkan, Sweden; Deutsche Bahn (DB), Germany; Ecole Polytechnique Federal de Lausanne (EPFL); and Eidgenössissche Materialprüfungsanstalt (EMPA), Switzerland; Luleå University of Technology and Lund University of Technology, Sweden; Finnish Rail Administration and Finnish Road Administration, Finland; Laboratoire Central des Pontes et Chaussées (LCPC), France; Network Rail, U.K.; Norut Technology, Norway; PKP Polish Railway Lines, Poland; Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Sweden; RWTH, Germany; Skanska Sverige AB, Sweden; SNCF, France; STO Skandinavia AB, Swedish Geotechnical Institute, and Swedish Road Administration, Sweden; Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain; University of Minho, Portugal; University of Oulu, Finland; University of Salford, U.K; Universität Stuttgart, Germany; Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland and WSP, Finland. The following companies outside the Sustainable Bridges Project have also contributed: Botniabanan, Sweden; Denmark Technical University (DTU), Denmark; Nordisk Spännarmering, Sweden; Savonia University of Applied Sciences, Finland and Örnsköldsviks kommun, Sweden.

References

American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2011). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI-318, Farmington Hills, MI, 503.
ASCE and American Concrete Institute (ACI) 445 on Shear and Torsion. (1998). “Recent approaches to shear design of structural concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 1375–1417.
Bentz, E. C., Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. R. (2006). “Simplified modified compression field theory for calculating shear strength of reinforced concrete elements.” ACI Struct. J., 103(4), 614–624.
Bicanic, N., Mang, H., Meschke, G., and De Borst, R., eds. (2014). Computational modelling of concrete structures, CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, Netherlands, 1120.
Brigade. (2011). Brigade software, 〈http://www.scanscot.com/products/overview/〉 (Jun. 7, 2014).
BV Bridge. (2003). BVS 583.10 Broregler för nybyggnad – BV Bro, utgåva 9 [Rules for new bridges—version 9], Banverket, Borlänge, Sweden (in Swedish).
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2004). “Design of concrete structures.” CSA-A23.3, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 352.
Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D. (1991). Prestressed concrete structures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 766.
Elfgren, L., and Noghabai, K. (2001). “Tension of reinforced concrete prisms. round robin analysis and tests on bond. A report from an investigation arranged by RILEM technical committee 147-FMB fracture mechanics to anchorage and bond.”, Luleå Univ. of Technology (LTU), Luleå, Sweden, 244.
Elfgren, L., and Noghabai, K. (2002). “Tension of concrete prisms. bond properties of reinforcement bars embedded in concrete tie elements. summary of a RILEM round-robin investigation arranged by TC 147-FMB ‘Fracture Mechanics to Anchorage and Bond’.” Mater. Struct., 35(6), 318–325.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2004). “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.”, Brussels, Belgium, 225.
fédération internationale du béton (FIB; International Federation for Structural Concrete). (2008). “Practitioners’ guide to finite element modelling of reinforced concrete structures. state-of -art report.” Bulletin 45, Int. Federation for Concrete Structures, Lausanne, Switzerland, 344.
Fernandez Ruiz, M., Muttoni, A., and Hars, E. (2007). “Experimental investigation on the load carrying capacity of thin webs including post-tensioning tendons.” Proc. Fib Symp., Int. Federation of Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 483–490.
Ferreira, D., Bairan, J., and Mari, A. (2012). “Modelação numérica de estruturas porticadas de betão armado e pré-esforçado críticas ao esforço transverso e propostas de reforço [Numerical simulation of reinforced and prestressed frame structures critical to shear and strengthening proposals].” Proc. Encontro Nacional Betao Estrutural- BE2012, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto (FEUP), Porto, Portugal, 10 (in Portuguese).
Malm, R. (2009). “Predicting shear type crack initiation and growth in concrete with non-linear finite element method.” Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nordin, H, and Täljsten, B. (2003). “Concrete beams strengthened with CFRP. a study of anchor lengths.” Proc. 10th Conf. on Structural Faults and Repair, Engineering Technical Press, Edinburgh, Scotland, 135.
Pimentel, P., Figueiras, J., and Bruhwiler, E. (2007). “Numerical modelling of prestressed beams for structural examination of existing bridges.” Congress on Numerical Methods in Engineering, J. César de Sá, R. Delgado, A. Rodríguez Ferran, J. Oliver, P. R. M. Lyra, and J. L. D. Alves, eds., APMTAC—Portugese Association for Theoretical, Applied and Computational Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal.
Plos, M. (1990). “Skjuvförsök i full skala på plattrambro i armerad betong [Full scale shear test of a reinforced concrete slab frame bridge].”, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Div. of Concrete Structures, Gothenburg, Sweden, 45–72 (in Swedish).
Plos, M. (1995). “Application of fracture mechanics to concrete bridges. finite element analysis and experiments.” Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Division of Concrete Structures, Gothenburg, Sweden, 57–70.
Puurula, A. (2012). “Load-carrying capacity of a strengthened reinforced concrete bridge. Non-linear finite element modeling of a test to failure. Assessment of train load capacity of a two span railway trough bridge in Örnsköldsvik strengthened with bars of carbon fibre reinforced polymers (CFRP).” Doctoral thesis, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, Luleå, Sweden, 328.
Puurula, A., et al. (2008). “Full-scale test to failure of a strengthened reinforced concrete bridge. Calibration of assessment models for load-bearing capacities of existing bridges.” Nordic Concrete Research, Vol. 2008:2, Publ. 38, The Nordic Concrete Federation, Oslo, Norway, 121–132.
Puurula, A., et al. (2013). “Loading to failure and 3D nonlinear FE modelling of a strengthened RC bridge.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng.,.
Richard, B., Epaillard, S., Cremona, C., Adelaide, L., and Elfgren, L. (2010). “Nonlinear finite element analysis of a 50 years old reinforced concrete trough bridge.” Eng. Struct., 32(12), 3899–3910.
Sas, G. (2011). “FRP shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams.” Doctoral thesis, Luleå Univ. of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Sas, G., Blanksvärd, T., Enochsson, O., Täljsten, B., Puurula, A., and Elfgren, L. (2011). “Flexural-shear failure of a full scale tested RC bridge strengthened with NSM CFRP: Shear capacity analysis.” Nordic Concr. Res., 2/2011(44), 189–206.
Sas, G., Blanksvärd, T., Enochsson, O., Täljsten, B., and Elfgren, L., (2012). “Photographic strain monitoring during full-scale failure testing of Örnsköldsvik bridge.” Struct. Health Monit., 11(4), 489–498.
Sustainable Bridges (SB). (2008). “Sustainable bridges—Assessment for future traffic demands and longer lives.” 〈www.sustainablebridges.net〉 (Jun. 7, 2014).
Sustainable Bridges (SB)-6.3. (2007). “Field Tests. Örnsköldsvik bridge—Full scale testing; Vitmossen—Strengthening of the subsoil; Frövi bridge—Strengthening and monitoring.”, B. Täljsten and A. Carolin, eds., Luleå Univ. of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Sustainable Bridges (SB)-7.3. (2008). “Field Test of a concrete bridge in Örnsköldsvik, Sweden.” Deliverable D 7.3, sustainable bridges, L. Elfgren, O. Enochsson, and H. Thun, eds., Luleå Univ. of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Schlune, H., Plos, M., and Gylltoft, K. (2009). “Improved bridge evaluation through finite element model updating using static and dynamic measurements.” Eng. Struct., 31(7), 1477–1485.
Scordelis, A. C., Elfgren, L. G., and Larsen, P. K. (1979). “Time-dependent behaviour of concrete box girder bridges.” ACI J., 76(1), 159–178.
Scordelis, A. C., Larsen, P. K., and Elfgren, L. G. (1977). “Ultimate strength of curved RC box girder bridge.” J. Struct. Div., 130, 1525–1542.
Täljsten, B. (1994). “Plate bonding. Strengthening of existing concrete structures with epoxy bonded plates of steel or fibre reinforced plastics.” Ph.D. thesis, 152 D, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, Luleå, Sweden, 283.
Täljsten, B., Blanksvärd, T., and Sas, G. (2011). Handbok för dimensionering i samband med förstärkning av betongkonstruktioner med pålimmade fiberkompositer [Design Guideline for FRP Strengthening of Existing Concrete Structures], Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, Luleå, Sweden, 184 (in Swedish).
Vogel, T., and Bargähr, R. (2006). “Zustandserfassung von Brücken bei deren Abbruch (ZEBRA) [Condition survey of bridges during their demolition].”, Dept. of Transport (UVEK), Zürich, Switzerland, 187 (in German).
Zwicky, D., and Vogel, T (2000). “Bruchversuche an ausgebauten Brückenträgern [Ultimate load tests on dismantled bridge girders].”, ETH Zurich, Institute of Structural Engineering, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 167.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141Issue 1January 2015

History

Received: May 5, 2013
Accepted: May 14, 2014
Published online: Jul 15, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 15, 2014
Published in print: Jan 1, 2015

Authors

Affiliations

Arto M. Puurula
Postdoctoral Researcher, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Ola Enochsson
Researcher, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Gabriel Sas
Researcher, NORUT, NO 8517 Narvik, Norway.
Thomas Blanksvärd
Assistant Professor, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Ulf Ohlsson
Assistant Professor, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Lars Bernspång
Associate Professor, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Björn Täljsten
Professor, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Anders Carolin
Bridge Engineer, Trafikverket, SE 97 125 Luleå, Sweden.
Björn Paulsson
Senior Infrastructure Engineer, Trafikverket, SE 78 189 Borlänge, Sweden.
Lennart Elfgren [email protected]
Emeritus Professor, Division of Structural Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share