Technical Papers
Jul 15, 2014

Field Verification of Simplified Analysis Procedures for Segmental Concrete Bridges

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 1

Abstract

Load tests on segmental bridges are uncommon in the literature given their relatively short history and comparatively smaller presence in the national bridge inventory. This paper presents results from two segmental concrete bridge field tests and compares them with common simplified longitudinal and transverse analysis procedures. These single-cell structures, built with balanced cantilever construction, represent two significantly different segmental concrete bridges. Designers frequently use a beamline model for longitudinal analysis. When compared with the load test results, this simple method produces conservative predictions of longitudinal behavior within 20%, which is also reflected in the literature. Conversely, little information exists in the literature on transverse bending analysis. When analyzing the localized transverse bending from concentrated wheel loads, designers commonly use an equivalent frame model. Most frequently, designers use influence surfaces to estimate the scaled loads to apply to these two-dimensional frame models. This simplified approach is shown to be conservative overall but cannot always predict bending sense and frequently overpredicts demand in excess of 100%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This publication was partially supported by a subcontract from Rutgers University, Center for Advanced Infrastructure & Transportation (CAIT), under DTFH61-08-C-00005 from the U.S. Department of Transportation—Federal Highway Administration (USDOT-FHWA). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Rutgers University or of the USDOT-FHWA.
The assistance of current and former graduate students of Virginia Tech, including Bernie Kassner, Soundar Sriram, Drew Woerheide, Kedar Halbe, Jon Emenheiser, and Kacie D’Alessandro, is gratefully acknowledged. Brian Pailes, graduate student at Rutgers, and Dr. David Wayne Mokarem of Virginia Tech were also integral to the completion of this research. Additionally, Dr. Michael Brown of the Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research, Sam Fallaha, Will Potter, and Doug Shockley of Florida Department of Transportation, and George Kuhn of Chandler Concrete provided much appreciated assistance.

References

Al-Omaishi, N., Tadros, M. K., and Seguirant, S. J. (2009). “Elasticity modulus, shrinkage and creep of high-strength concrete as adopted by AASHTO.” PCI J., 54(3), 44–63.
Barker, J. M. (1978). Post-tensioned box girder bridge manual, Post Tensioning Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Chung, W. S. (2003). “A cracked concrete material model for the non-linear finite element analysis of slab-on-girder bridges.” Doctoral dissertation, Perdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
Collins, W. N. (2010). “Live load testing and analysis of the southbound span of U.S. Route 15 over Interstate-66.” Master’s thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Davis, R. T., Thompson, M. K., Wood, B. A., Breen, J. E., and Kreger, M. E. (1999). “Measurement-based performance evaluation of a segmental concrete bridge.”, Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, TX.
Duemmel, P. S., Baber, T. T., Barton, F. W., and McKeel, W. T. (1992). “Field instrumentation and measured response of the I-295 cable-stayed bridge: Part 1—Field study of live load responses.” Rep. to Virinia Dept. of Transportation. Richmond, VA.
Hawkins, N. M., and Clark, J. H. (1983). “Investigation of thermal and live load stresses in Denny Creek Viaduct.” Rep. to Washington State Dept. of Transportation. Olympia, WA.
Homberg, H. (1968). Roadway slabs with variable thicknesses, Springer, New York.
Kuhn, D. (2008). “Transverse analysis and field measurements of segmental box girder bridges.” Master’s thesis, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL.
Kurian, B., and Menon, D. (2005). “Correction of errors in simplified transverse bending analysis of concrete box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 650–657.
Kurian, B., and Menon, D. (2006). “Simplified method for transverse bending analysis of concrete box-girder bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 33(2), 121–127.
Kurian, B., and Menon, D. (2008). “Transverse bending analysis of concrete box-girder bridges with flange overhangs.” J. Struct. Eng., 35(3), 173–179.
Libby, J. R. (1976). “Segmental box girder bridge superstructure design.” ACI J., 73(5), 279–290.
Lissenden, C. J. (1988). “Dynamic modeling of a cable stayed bridge during construction.” Master’s thesis, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Maguire, M. (2013). “Transverse and longitudinal bending of segmental box girder bridges.” Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
McClure, R. M., and West, H. H. (1980). “Field testing of an experimental segmental bridge.”, Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation, Harrisonburg, PA.
McClure, R. M., Anderson, D. B., and McDevitt, T. E. (1980). “Laboratory testing of segments for an experimental bridge.”, Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation, Harrisburg, PA.
Moreton, A. J. (1998). “Segmental analysis and design fundamentals.” Recommended practice for design and construction of segmental concrete bridges, American Segmental Bridge Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Pucher, A. (1977). Influence surfaces of elastic plates, Springer, New York.
Roberts-Wollmann, C. L., Breen, J. E., and Kreger, M. E. (2001). “Live load tests of the San Antonio ‘Y’.” J. Bridge Eng., 556–563.
Sanayei, M., and Onipede, O. B. R. (1992). “Selection of noisy measurement locations for error reduction in static parameter identification.” Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 30(9), 2299–2309.
Sennet, R. E. (2000). Matrix analysis of structures, Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL.
Takebayashi, T., Deeprasertwong, K., and Leung, Y. W. (1994). “A full-scale destructive test of a precast segmental box girder bridge with dry joints and external tendons.” Proc., ICE Struct. Build., 104(3), 297–315.
Tassin, D. M. (1998). “Design of precase segmental bridges build span-by-span.” Recommended practice for design and construction of segmental concrete bridges, American Segmental Bridge Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Thoman, S. J., Redfield, C. M., and Hollenbeck, R. E. (1984). “Load test of single-cell box girder bridge cantilever deck.” J. Struct. Eng., 1773–1785.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 141Issue 1January 2015

History

Received: May 1, 2013
Accepted: May 7, 2014
Published online: Jul 15, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 15, 2014
Published in print: Jan 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Marc Maguire, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, 4110 Old Main Hill, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Cristopher D. Moen, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, 102-C Patton Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]
Carin Roberts-Wollmann, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Patton Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]
Tommy Cousins, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Patton Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share