Technical Papers
Jun 28, 2013

Two Near-Optimal Layouts for Trusslike Bridge Structures Bearing Uniform Weight between Supports

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 4

Abstract

Although the primary objective on designing a structure is to support the external loads, the achievement of an optimal layout that reduces all costs associated with the structure is an aspect of increasing interest. The problem of finding the optimal layout for bridgelike structures subjected to a uniform load is considered. The problem is formulated following a theory on economy of frame structures, using the stress volume as the objective function and including the selection of appropriate values for statically indeterminate reactions. It is solved in a function space of finite dimension instead of using a general variational approach, obtaining near-optimal solutions. The results obtained with this profitable strategy are very close to the best layouts known to date, with differences of less than 2% for the stress volume, but with a simpler layout that can be recognized in some real bridges. This strategy could be a guide to preliminary design of bridges subject to a wide class of costs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to José Ignacio Hernando (Madrid) for his linear programming solutions, Wilfrid Gangbo for his valuable answers to our questions about his own research, and anonymous reviewers for their valuable criticism. We also thank Blanca Estevan for her search of bridges resembling the AOH layout. Many of the research work for this paper was carried out during the one-year stay of M. Vázquez Espí at CIMNE (Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona), financed by the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Thanks are due to Professor Eugenio Oñate and the CIMNE staff for their hospitality.

References

Antuña, J., and Vázquez Espí, M. (2012). “¿Existen problemas estructurales irresolubles? Una cuestión abierta.” Informes de la Construcción, 64(525), 103–109.
Baker, W. F., Beghini, L. L., Mazurek, A., Carrion, J., and Beghini, A. (2013). “Maxwell’s reciprocal diagrams and discrete Michell frames.” Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 48(2), 267–277.
Bouchitté, G., Gangbo, W., and Seppecher, P. (2008). “Michell trusses and lines of principal action.” Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 18(9), 1571–1603.
Bow, R. H. (1873). Economics of construction in relation to framed structures, E. & F. N. Spon, London.
Cervera Bravo, J. (1989). “Tres teoremas fundamentales de la teoría del diseño de estructuras.” Informes de la Construcción, 40(399), 57–66.
Cervera Bravo, J., and Vázquez Espí, M. (2011). “Galileo, Maxwell, Michell, Aroca: Measuring the structural efficiency.” Structural Milestone in Architecture and Engineering. Int. Conf. on Research in Construction, IETcc–UPM, Madrid, Instituto de Ciencias de la Construcción (CSIC), 〈http://oa.upm.es/9931/〉 (Oct. 14, 2013).
Clausius, R. (1885). Über die Energievorräte der Natur und ihre Verwertung zum Nutzen der Menschheit, Verlag von Max Cohen & Sohn, Bonn, Germany.
Cox, H. L. (1965). The design of structures of least weight, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.
Cross, H. (1936). “The relation of analysis to structural design.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 101(1), 1363–1374.
Darwich, W., Gilbert, M., and Tyas, A. (2010). “Optimum structure to carry a uniform load between pinned supports.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 42(1), 33–42.
de Miguel Rodríguez, J. L., and Aroca, R. (1974). “Trabajo estructural: un nuevo escalar de las estructuras.” Ph.D. dissertation, ETS de Arquitectura de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid.
French, M. J. (1999). “A second law for structures: An insightfull approach to the design of plane frames.” Trans. ASME, 66(3), 738–741.
Gabler, G. (2006). “Apollo-Donaubrücke in Bratislava.” Der Stahlbau, 75(2), 138–144.
Galilei, G. (1638). Discorsi e Dimostrazioni Matematiche, Elsevierii, Leiden, Holland.
Hemp, W. S. (1958). “Theory of structural design.”, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Advisory Group for Aeronautical Research & Development, Paris.
Hemp, W. S. (1973). Optimum structures, Clarendon, Oxford, U.K.
Hemp, W. S. (1974). “Michell framework for uniform load between fixed supports.” Eng. Optim., 1(1), 61–69.
Maxwell, J. C. (1870). “On reciprocal figures, frames and diagrams of forces.” Scientific Papers I I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 160–202.
McConnel, R. E. (1974). “Least-weight framework for loads across span.” J. Eng. Mech. Div., 100(EM5), 885–901.
Michell, A. G. M. (1904). “The limits of economy of material in frame-structures.” Philosophical Magazine S.6, 8(47), 589–597, 〈http://habitat.aq.upm.es/gi/mve/dt/〉 (Oct. 14, 2013).
Owen, J. B. B. (1965). The analysis and design of light structures, Edward Arnold, London.
Parkes, E. W. (1965). Braced frameworks: An introduction to the theory of structures, Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K.
Pichugin, A. V., Tyas, A., and Gilbert, M. (2012). “On the optimality of Hemp’s arch with vertical hangers.” Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 46(1), 17–25.
Rozvany, G. I. N. (2011). “Comments on the authors’ reply by T. Sokó and T. Lewiñski (2011) to a discussion by Vazquez and Cervera (2011) on their research paper (Sokó and Lewiñski 2010).” Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 44(5), 735–737.
Rozvany, G. I. N., and Sokó, T. (2012). “Exact truss topology optimization: Allowance for support costs and different permissible stresses in tension and compression—Extensions of a classical solution by Michell.” Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 45(3), 367–376.
Srithongchai, S., and Dewhurst, P. (2003). “Comparisons of optimality criteria for minimum-weight dual material structures.” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 45(11), 1781–1797.
Tveit, P. (2007). “An introduction to the optimal network arch.” Struct. Eng. Int., 17(2), 184–187.
Vázquez Espí, C., and Vázquez Espí, M. (1997). “Discussion: Sizing, shape, and topology design optimization of trusses using genetic algorithm.” J. Struct. Eng., 375–376.
Vázquez Espí, M. (2012). “On the allowance for support costs in Prager-Rozvany’ optimal layout theory.” Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 48(4), 847–852.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 140Issue 4April 2014

History

Received: Sep 27, 2012
Accepted: Jun 26, 2013
Published online: Jun 28, 2013
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014
Discussion open until: May 3, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jaime Cervera Bravo [email protected]
Departamento de Estructuras de Edificación, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Juan de Herrera, 4.28040 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Carlos Vázquez Espí [email protected]
Departamento de Fundamentos Matemáticos, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Aeronáutica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Plaza del Cardenal Cisneros 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]
Mariano Vázquez Espí [email protected]
Grupo de Investigación en Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Sostenibilidad, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Juan de Herrera, 4.28040 Madrid, Spain (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share