Static and Dynamic Stability of Elastomeric Bearings for Seismic Protection of Structures
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 7
Abstract
Bearings used in the seismic isolation of buildings can be subjected to large horizontal deformations combined with high axial loads from overturning forces during strong shaking. Elastomeric bearing design requires an evaluation of the critical load capacity under this combined loading to ensure stability. To better understand and estimate the capacity of elastomeric bearings, a comprehensive experimental program was carried out to examine bearing stability using two quasi-static and one dynamic loading procedures. The first method to evaluate the bearing critical load follows previous experimental research, where a single elastomeric bearing is held at prespecified horizontal displacements while increasing the axial load until the critical load is achieved. In a second method implemented here, a similar setup is used to apply a constant axial load followed by increased horizontal displacement until the stability limit is observed. This second method is shown to be an accurate and more direct approach to obtaining the critical load directly from the test data. The third method evaluates the dynamic stability of a rigid frame on four elastomeric bearings subjected to earthquake motions on a shake table. These tests are able to quantify the response of elastomeric bearings at and beyond their stability limit under more realistic loading conditions. Results from the three experimental procedures are compared, and the reduced-area formulation commonly used to predict the critical load of elastomeric bearings is evaluated, resulting in new recommendations for defining the parameters used in this formula to improve its accuracy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work is part of the NEES TIPS project supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Nos. CMMI-0724208 and CMMI-1113275. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the investigators and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. The authors are grateful to Drs. M. Constantinou and A. Whittaker for the helpful discussion and advice provided throughout this research study and to the anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to improve this paper.
References
Aiken, I. D., Kelly, J. M., and Tajirian, F. F. (1989). “Mechanics of low shape factor elastomeric seismic isolation bearings.” UCB/EERC-89/13, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Buckle, I., Nagarajaiah, S., and Ferrell, K. (2002). “Stability of elastomeric isolation bearings: Experimental study.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(1), 3–11.
Buckle, I. G., and Kelly, J. M. (1986). “Properties of slender elastomeric isolation bearings during shake table studies of a large-scale model bridge deck.” Proc., 2nd World Congress on Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, Publication SP-94, Vol. 1, American Concrete Iinstitute, Detroit, 247–269.
Buckle, I. G., and Liu, H. (1993). “Stability of elastomeric seismic isolation systems.” Proc., Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation, and Control, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, CA, 293–305.
Buckle, I. G., and Liu, H. (1994). “Critical loads of elastomeric isolators at high shear strain.” Proc., 3rd US-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Protective Systems for Bridges, Rep. NCEER-94-0009, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1998a). “Evaluation findings for Scougal Rubber Corporation high damping rubber bearings.” Rep. No. HITEC 98-11 40373, Civil Engineering Research Foundation, Washington, DC.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1998b). “Evaluation findings for Skellerup base isolation elastromeric bearings.” Rep. No. HITEC 98-11 40376, Civil Engineering Research Foundation, Washington, DC.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1998c). “Evaluation findings for Tekton, Inc., steel rubber bearings.” Rep. No. HITEC 98-10 40365, Civil Engineering Research Foundation, Washington, DC.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1999). “Summary of evaluation findings for the testing of seismic isolation and energy dissipating devices.” Rep. No. 40404, Civil Engineering Research Foundation, Washington, DC.
Clark, P. W., Aiken, I. D., and Kelly, J. M. (1997). “Experimental studies of the ultimate behavior of seismically isolated structures.” UCB/EERC-97/18, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Constantinou, M. C., Kalpakidis, I., Filiatrault, A., and Ecker Lay, R. A. (2011). “LRFD-based analysis and design procedures for bridge bearings and seismic isolators.” Rep. No. MCEER-11-0004, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering, Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Constantinou, M. C., Whittaker, A. S., Kalpakidis, Y., Fenz, D. M., and Warn, G. (2007). “Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading.” MCEER-07-0012, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering, Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Gent, A. N. (1964). “Elastic stability of rubber compression springs.” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 6(4), 318–326.
Haringx, J. A. (1948). “On highly compressible helical springs and rubber rods and their application for vibration-free mountings. I.” Philips Res. Rep., 3, 401–449.
Haringx, J. A. (1949a). “On highly compressible helical springs and rubber rods and their application for vibration-free mountings. II.” Philips Res. Rep., 4, 49–80.
Haringx, J. A. (1949b). “On highly compressible helical springs and rubber rods and their application for vibration-free mountings. III.” Philips Res. Rep., 4, 206–220.
Kasalanati, A., and Constantinou, M. (1999). “Experimental study of bridge elastomeric and other isolation and energy dissipation systems with emphasis on uplift prevention and high velocity near-source seismic excitation.” MCEER-99-0004, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering, Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Kelly, J. M. (1991). “Dynamic and failure characteristics of bridgestone bearings.” UCB/EERC-91/04, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Koh, C. G., and Kelly, J. M. (1989). “Viscoelastic stability model for elastomeric isolation bearings.” J. Struct. Eng., 115(2), 285–302.
Masroor, A., and Mosqueda, G. (2012). “Experimental simulation of base-isolated buildings pounding against moat wall and effects on superstructure response.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 41(14), 2093–2109.
Nagarajaiah, S., and Ferrell, K. (1999). “Stability of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(9), 946–954.
Sanchez, J. (2011), “Stability of elastomeric bearings for seismic applications.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Southwell, R. V. (1932). “On the analysis of experimental observations in problems of elastic stability.” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 135(828), 601–616.
Warn, G. P., and Whittaker, A. S. (2006). “Property modification factors for seismically isolated bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 11(3), 371–377.
Weisman, J., and Warn, G. P. (2011). “Stability of elastomeric and lead-rubber seismic isolation bearings.” J. Struct. Eng., 138(2), 215–223.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 139 • Issue 7 • July 2013
Pages: 1149 - 1159
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 18, 2011
Accepted: May 25, 2012
Published online: May 28, 2012
Published in print: Jul 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.