Technical Papers
May 18, 2012

Simulation-Based Fragility Relationships for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 3

Abstract

Unreinforced masonry (URM) structures represent a significant portion of the residential building stock of the central and eastern United States. Fifteen percent of homes in the eight-state region impacted by the New Madrid Seismic Zone are URM buildings. The brittle nature of URM buildings further supports a thorough consideration of seismic response given the susceptibility to severe failure modes. Currently, there is a pressing need for analytically based fragility curves for URM buildings. To improve the estimation of damage-state probabilities through the development of simulation-based URM fragilities, an extensive literature survey is conducted on pushover analysis. Using these data, capacity curves are generated, from which damage performance limit states are defined. Demand is simulated using synthetically derived accelerograms representative of the central and eastern United States. Structural response is evaluated using an advanced capacity spectrum method. Capacity, demand, and response are thus derived analytically and utilized to generate a more reliable and uniform set of fragility curves for use in loss-assessment software. This paper presents a framework amenable to rapid, flexible updating that, with the appropriate database of studies, is capable of producing curves representative of any URM building typology subjected to a specified hazard. The curves are expressed in multiple forms to demonstrate capability of use in various loss-assessment applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of FEMA for funding of the New Madrid Catastrophic Planning Initiative and the National Science Foundation (NSF) for establishing the Mid-America Earthquake Center (MAEC) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

References

Abrams, D. P., and Shah, N. (1992). Cyclic load testing of unreinforced masonry walls, Advanced Construction Technology Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
ASCE. (2005). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-05, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1984). “Tentative provisions.” Rep. ATC-3-06, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1996). “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings.” Rep. ATC-40, Redwood City, CA.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1999). “Evaluation and repair of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings.” Rep. ATC-43CD, Redwood City, CA.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2005). “Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures.” Rep. ATC-55, Redwood City, CA.
Atkinson, G. M., and Boore, D. M. (1995). “Ground-motion relations for eastern North America.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 85(1), 17–30.
Benedetti, D., and Benzoni, G. M. (1984). “A numerical model for seismic analysis of masonry buildings: Experimental correlations.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 12(6), 817–831.
Bommer, J., Spence, R., Erdik, M., Tabuchi, S., Aydinoglu, N., Booth, E., del Re, D., and Peterken, O. (2002). “Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance.” J. Seismology, 6(3), 431–446.
Boore, D. M. (2003). “Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method.” Pure Appl. Geophys., 160(3), 635–676.
Bothara, J. K., Dhakal, R. P., and Mander, J. B. (2010). “Seismic performance of an unreinforced masonry building: An experimental investigation.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 39(1), 45–68.
Costley, A. C., and Abrams, D. P. (1995). “Dynamic response of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Dolce, M., Kappos, A., Masi, A., Penelis, G., and Vona, M. (2006). “Vulnerability assessment and earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) using Italian and Greek methodologies.” Eng. Struct., 28(3), 357–371.
Dowrick, D. J. (1998). “Damage and intensities in the magnitude 7.8 1931 Hawke's bay, New Zealand, Earthquake.” Bul. of the New Zealand Nat. Soc. for Earthqu. Eng., 31(3), 139–163.
Elnashai, A. S., and Di Sarno, L. (2008). Fundamentals of earthquake engineering, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Epperson, G. S., and Abrams, D. P. (1989). Nondestructive evaluation of masonry buildings, Advanced Construction Technology Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Fajfar, P. (2000). “A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design.” Earthq. Spectra, 16(3), 573–592.
FEMA. (1997). “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” FEMA 273, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (1998). “Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings.” FEMA 307, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2003). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model: HAZUS-MH MRI, technical and user’s manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2006). HAZUS-MH MR2 Technical Manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
Fernandez, A. (2007). Numerical simulation of earthquake ground motions in the upper Mississippi embayment, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Frankel, A. D., et al. (2000). “USGS national seismic hazard maps.” Earthq. Spectra, 16(1), 1–19.
Frankie, T. M. (2010). “Simulation-based fragility relationships for unreinforced masonry buildings.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Freeman, S. A. (1978). “Prediction of response of concrete buildings to severe earthquake motion,” American Concrete Institute, Detroit. SP-55, 589–605.
Gencturk, B. (2007). “Improved fragility relationships for populations of buildings based on inelastic response.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Gencturk, B., and Elnashai, A. S. (2008). “Development and application of an advanced capacity spectrum method.” Eng. Struct., 30(11), 3345–3354.
Ghafory-Ashtiany, M., and Mousavi, R. (2005). “History, geography, and economy of Bam.” Earthq. Spectra, 21(S1), S3–S11.
International Code Council (ICC). (2006). International Building Code, International Code Council, Washington, DC.
Jaiswal, K. S., and Wald, D. J. (2008). “Creating a global building inventory for earthquake loss assessment and risk management,” Open-File Report 2008-1160, USGS, Reston, VA.
Kim, S. C., and White, D. (2002). “Three-dimensional nonlinear time history analysis of low-rise shear wall buildings with flexible diaphragms.” Proc., 7th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Boston.
Krawinkler, H., and Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. (1998). “Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation.” Eng. Struct., 20(4–6), 452–464.
Madabhushi, S., and Haigh, S. (2005). The Bhuj India earthquake of 26th Jan 2001: A field report by EEFIT, Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team, Institution of Structural Engineers, London.
Magenes, G. (2000). “A method for pushover analysis in seismic assessment of masonry buildings.” Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Upper Hutt, New Zealand.
Magenes, G., Calvi, G. M., and Kingsley, G. R. (1995). Seismic testing of a full-scale, two-story masonry building: Test procedure and measured experimental response. Experimental and numerical investigation on a brick masonry building prototype—numerical prediction of the experiment, Rep. 3.0, Dept. of Structural Mechanics, Univ. of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Mwafy, A. M., and Elnashai, A. S. (2001). “Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings.” Eng. Struct., 23(5), 407–424.
Papanikolaou, V. K., Elnashai, A. S., and Pareja, J. F. (2006). “Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis II: Comparative results.” J. Earthq. Eng., 10(1), 127–151.
Park, J., Towashiraporn, P., Craig, J. I., and Goodno, B. J. (2009). “Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures.” Eng. Struct., 31(1), 125–137.
Park, R. (1988). “Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing.” Proc., 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. VIII, Japan Association for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, Tokyo-Kyoto, 605–616.
Penelis, G. G., Kappos, A. J., Stylianidis, K. C., and Lagomarsino, S. (2002). “Statistical assessment of the vulnerability of unreinforced masonry buildings.” Proc., Int. Conf. Earthquake Loss Estimation and Risk Reduction, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Tokyo.
Rota, M., Penna, A., and Magenes, G. (2010). “A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses.” Eng. Struct., 32(5), 1312–1323.
Salonikios, T., Karakostas, C., Lekidis, V., and Anthoine, A. (2003). “Comparative inelastic pushover analysis of masonry frames.” Eng. Struct., 25(12), 1515–1523.
Silva, W., Gregor, N., and Darragh, R. (2003). Development of regional hard rock attenuation relations for central and eastern North America, mid-continent and Gulf coast areas, Pacific Engineering and Analysis, El Cerrito, CA.
Spence, R. (2007). “Saving lives in earthquakes: successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960.” Bull. Earthq. Eng., 5(2), 139–251.
Taucer, F., Alarcon, J., and So, E. (2009). “2007 August 15 magnitude 7.9 earthquake near the coast of central Peru: Analysis and field mission report.” Bull. Earthq. Eng., 7(1), 1–70.
The International Disaster Database. (2009). “Disasters in numbers.” 〈http://www.emdat.be/database.〉 (Feb. 2010)
Wen, Y. K., Ellingwood, B. R., and Bracci, J. M. (2004a). Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering, Project DS-4 Rep., Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center, April 28, 2004, Urbana, IL.
Wen, Y. K., Ellingwood, B. R., and Bracci, J. M. (2004b). Vulnerability functions, Project FD-2 Rep., Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center, Urbana, IL.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 139Issue 3March 2013
Pages: 400 - 410

History

Received: Oct 10, 2010
Accepted: May 16, 2012
Published online: May 18, 2012
Published in print: Mar 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thomas M. Frankie, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801-2352 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Bora Gencturk, A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4003
Amr S. Elnashai, F.ASCE
Professor, Head, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801-2352

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share