Approximations in Progressive Collapse Modeling
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 9
Abstract
Assumptions must necessarily be made when the collapse response of structures is investigated using simulation models. The type and extent of modeling assumptions depend on the computational resources available, modeling expertise, and results sought. Modeling choices that are commonly made include planar versus three-dimensional (3D) representation, simplification of member response for modeling purposes, and the use of macroelements to mimic behavior instead of using elements that are based on fundamental constitutive relationships. Using four different types of models, this paper sheds light on the effect of some commonly employed approximations in collapse modeling. The models represent a 10-story seismically designed steel building and encompass computationally expedient planar and 3D macromodels as well as continuum models of individual frames and the full 3D structural system. After a validation exercise, the simulation models are exercised to investigate system collapse response when columns are forcibly removed and to highlight the effects of the various modeling approaches. The simulation studies show that the floor system contributes significantly to collapse response. It is also shown that well calibrated macromodels can be relied on for accuracy when modeling progressive collapse and that the results of planar analyses cannot always be viewed as conservative.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The presented work was supported in part by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Michigan and the National Science Foundation through grants NSFSES-0824737 and NSFCMMI-0928193. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.
References
Alashker, Y., and El-Tawil, S. (2011). “Design-oriented model for collapse resistance of composite floors subjected to column loss.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(1), 84–92.
Alashker, Y., El-Tawil, S., and Sadek, F. (2010). “Progressive collapse resistance of steel-concrete composite floors.” J. Struct. Eng., 136(10), 1187–1196.
Bao, Y., Kunnath, S. K., El-Tawil, S., and Lew, H. S. (2008). “Macro-model based simulation of progressive collapse: RC frame structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(7), 1079–1091.
Department of Defense (DoD). (2009). “Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse.” Unified Facility Criteria (UFC) 4-023-03, Washington, DC.
Gross, J. L., and McGuire, W. (1983). “Progressive collapse resistant design.” J. Struct. Eng., 109(1), 1–15.
Hallquist, J. (2006). LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual, Version 971, Livermore Software Technology, Livermore, CA.
Isobe, D., and Tsuda, M. (2003). “Seismic collapse analysis of reinforced concrete framed structures using the finite element method.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(13), 2027–2046.
Jin, J., and El-Tawil, S. (2005). “Evaluation of FEMA-350 seismic provision of steel panel zones.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(2), 250–258.
Kaewkulchai, G., and Williamson, E. B. (2004). “Beam element formulation and solution procedure for dynamic progressive collapse analysis.” Comput. Struct., 82(7–8), 639–651.
Khandelwal, K., and El-Tawil, S. (2007). “Collapse behavior of steel special moment resisting frame connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 133(5), 646–655.
Khandelwal, K., El-Tawil, S., Kunnath, S. K., and Lew, H. S. (2008). “Macro-model based simulations of progressive collapse steel frame structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(7), 1070–1078.
Liang, X., Shen, Q., and Ghosh, S. K. (2006). Assessing ability of seismic structural system to withstand progressive collapse: Seismic design and progressive collapse analysis of steel frame buildings, SK Ghosh and Associates, Palatine, IL.
Ruth, P., Marchand, K. A., and Williamson, E. B. (2006). “Static equivalency in progressive collapse alternate path analysis: Reducing conservatism while retaining structural integrity.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20(4), 349–364.
Sadek, F., El-Tawil, S., and Lew, H. S. (2008). “Robustness of composite floor system with shear connections: Modeling, simulation, and evaluation.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(11), 1717–1725.
Sadek, F., Main, J. A., Lew, H. S., Robert, S. D., Chiarito, V. P., and El-Tawil, S. (2010). “An experimental and analytical study of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario.” NIST Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.
U.S. General Service Administration (GSA). (2003). Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office building and major modernization project, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 137 • Issue 9 • September 2011
Pages: 914 - 924
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 10, 2010
Accepted: May 31, 2011
Published online: Jun 1, 2011
Published in print: Sep 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.