Cost-Based Optimum Scheduling of Inspection and Monitoring for Fatigue-Sensitive Structures under Uncertainty
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 11
Abstract
Inspection and monitoring of deteriorating structures are generally performed to assess structural integrity and predict the remaining service life. For deteriorating structures, a reliable prediction of damage occurrence and the time-dependent damage evaluation depend on the accuracy of deterioration models under uncertainty. A probabilistic approach to establish optimum cost-based inspection and monitoring schedules of fatigue-sensitive structures is proposed in this paper. The inspection schedule is the solution of an optimization problem to minimize the expected total cost, including the costs of inspections or monitorings, and the expected failure cost. The failure criterion uses damage detection time and time for damage to reach the critical state. The uncertainties associated with damage occurrence/propagation and damage detection time are both considered. The solution of the optimization provides the inspection times and quality of inspections. The formulation of the optimization for inspection scheduling is extended to monitoring scheduling. Effects of the failure cost on inspection and monitoring scheduling are also studied. The proposed approach is applied to a fatigue-sensitive structure.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) through NSFCMS-0639428; the Department of Community and Economic Development in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania through the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Technology Alliance (PITA); the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Cooperative Agreement Award FHADTFH61-07-H-00040; the U.S. Office of Naval Research (ONR) through contract number ONRN00014-08-1-0188; and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Grant NASANNX10AJ20G. The opinions and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations.
References
Berens, A. P. (1989). “NDE reliability analysis.” Metal handbook, 9th Ed., Vol. 17, ASM International, Material Park, OH, 689–701.
Berens, A. P., and Hovey, P. W. (1981). Evaluation of NDE reliability characterization, Air Force Wright-Aeronautical Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH.
Boller, C., and Buderath, M. (2007). “Fatigue in aerostructures—Where structure health monitoring can contribute to a complex subject.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 365(1851), 561–587.
British Standards Institution (BSI). (2005). “Guidance on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in fusion welded structures.” BS7910, London.
Cartz, L. (1995). Nondestructive testing: Radiography, ultrasonics, liquid penetrant, magnetic particle, eddy current, ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Chang, P. C., Flatau, A., and Liu, S. C. (2003). “Review paper: Health monitoring of civil infrastructure.” Struct. Health Monit., 2(3), 257–267.
Chung, H.-Y., Manuel, L., and Frank, K. H. (2006). “Optimal inspection scheduling of steel bridges using nondestructive testing techniques.” J. Bridge Eng., 11(3), 305–319.
Clark, J. D. (1991). “Fatigue crack initiation and propagation in warship hulls.” Advances in marine structures—2, C. S. Smith and R. S. Dow, eds., Elsevier Applied Science, London, 42–60.
Cramer, E. H., Schulte-Strauthaus, R., and Bea, R. G. (1992). “Structural maintenance project volume 1—Fatigue damage evaluation software theory documentation and verification.” Rep. No. SSC-386, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC.
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002). “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6(2), 182–197.
Dexter, R. J., FitzPatrick, R. J., and St. Peter, D. L. (2003). “Fatigue strength and adequacy of weld repairs.” Rep. No. SSC-425, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC.
Ellingwood, B. R. (2005). “Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructures: State of practice and research issues.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 1(1), 7–18.
Enright, M. P., and Frangopol, D. M. (1999). “Maintenance planning for deteriorating concrete bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(12), 1407–1414.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (1999). “Repair optimization of highway bridges using system reliability approach.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(7), 766–775.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2001). “Minimum expected cost-oriented optimal maintenance planning for deteriorating structures: application to concrete bridge decks.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 73(3), 281–291.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2005). “Life-cycle evaluation and condition assessment of structures.” Chapter 36, Structural engineering handbook, 2nd Ed., W.-F. Chen and E. M. Lui, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 36-1–36-51.
Farhey, D. N. (2005). “Bridge instrumentation and monitoring for structural diagnostic.” Struct. Health Monit., 4(4), 301–318.
Fatemi, A., and Yang, L. (1998). “Cumulative fatigue damage and life prediction theories: A survey of the state of the art for homogeneous materials.” Int. J. Fatigue, 20(1), 9–34.
Fisher, J. W. (1984). Fatigue and fracture in steel bridges, Wiley, New York.
Fisher, J. W., Kulak, G. L., and Smith, I. F. (1998). “A fatigue primer for structural engineers.” National Steel Bridge Alliance, Chicago, IL.
Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(6), 389–413.
Frangopol, D. M., Lin, K. Y., and Estes, A. C. (1997). “Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(10), 1390–1401.
Garbatov, Y., and Soares, C. G. (2001). “Cost and reliability based strategies for fatigue maintenance planning of floating structures.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 73(3), 293–301.
Glen, L. F., Dinovitzer, A., Malik, L., Basu, R., and Yee, R. (2000). “Guide to damage tolerance analysis of marine structures.” Rep. No. SSC-409, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC.
Harris, D. O. (1977). “A means of assessing the effects of NDT on the reliability of cyclically loading structures.” Mater. Eval., 35(7), 57–65.
Irwin, G. R. (1958). “The crack-extension-force for a crack at a free surface boundary.” Rep. No. 5120, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.
Kim, S., and Frangopol, D. M. (2011a). “Inspection and monitoring planning for RC structures based on minimization of expected damage detection delay.” Prob. Eng. Mech., 26(2), 308–320.
Kim, S., and Frangopol, D. M. (2011b). “Optimum inspection planning for minimizing fatigue damage detection delay of ship hull structures.” Int. J. Fatigue, 33(3), 448–459.
Kulkarni, S. S., and Achenbach, J. D. (2008). “Structural health monitoring and damage prognosis in fatigue.” Struct. Health Monit., 7(1), 37–49.
Kwon, K., and Frangopol, D. M. (2010). “Bridge fatigue reliability assessment using probability density functions of equivalent stress range based on field monitoring data.” Int. J. Fatigue, 32(8), 1221–1232.
Lee, L. Y., Pan, J., Hathaway, R., and Barkey, M. (2005). Fatigue testing and analysis: Theory and analysis, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
Madsen, H. O., Torhaug, R., and Cramer, E. H. (1991). “Probability-based cost benefit analysis of fatigue design, inspection and maintenance.” Proc., Marine Structural Inspection, Maintenance and Monitoring Symp., SSC/SNAME, Arlington, VA.
MATLAB Version R2009a [Computer software]. MathWorks. Natick, MA.
Miki, C. (2007). “Retrofitting engineering for steel bridge structures.” XIII WG5-74-07, International Institute of Welding, Tokyo, Japan.
Moan, T. (2005). “Reliability-based management of inspection, maintenance and repair of offshore structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 1(1), 33–62.
Mohanty, J. R., Verma, B. B., and Ray, P. K. (2009). “Prediction of fatigue crack growth and residual life using an exponential model: Part I (constant amplitude loading).” Int. J. Fatigue, 31(3), 418–424.
Mori, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (1994a). “Maintaining reliability of concrete structures. I: Role of inspection/repair.” J. Struct. Eng., 120(3), 824–845.
Mori, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (1994b). “Maintaining reliability of concrete structures. II: Optimum inspection/repair.” J. Struct. Eng., 120(3), 846–862.
Murthy, V. K., and Swartz, G. B. (1974). “Cumulative fatigue damage—Theory and models.” Stat. Pap., 15(2–3), 202–231.
Packman, P. F., Pearson, H. S., Owens, J. S., and Young, G. (1969). “Definition of fatigue cracks through nondestructive testing.” J. Mater., 4(3), 666–700.
Papazian, J. M., et al. (2007). “Sensors for monitoring early stage fatigue cracking.” Int. J. Fatigue, 29(9–11), 1668–1680.
Paris, P. C., and Erdogan, F. A. (1963). “Critical analysis of crack propagation laws.” J. Basic Eng., 85(Series D), 528–534.
Rolfe, S. T., Hays, K. T., and Henn, A. E. (1993). “Fracture mechanics methodology for fracture control in VLCCs.” Ship Structures Symp. 1993, SNAME, Arlington, VA.
Schijve, J. (2003). “Fatigue of structures and materials in the 20th century and the state of the art.” Int. J. Fatigue, 25(8), 679–702.
Soares, C. G., and Garbatov, Y. (1996a). “Fatigue reliability of the ship hull girder accounting for inspection and repair.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 51(3), 341–351.
Soares, C. G., and Garbatov, Y. (1996b). “Fatigue reliability of the ship hull girder.” Mar. Struct., 9(3–4), 495–516.
White, G. J., and Ayyub, B. M. (1987). “Reliability-based fatigue design for ship structures.” Nav. Eng. J., 99(3), 135–149.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 15, 2010
Accepted: Dec 27, 2010
Published online: Dec 29, 2010
Published in print: Nov 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.