Seismic Design and Performance of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames with Nonlinear Replaceable Links
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 10
Abstract
Although moment resisting frames (MRFs) designed according to the latest seismic codes can provide life safety during a design level earthquake, they are expected to sustain significant damage at flexural yielding locations in the beams. The design of the beams for strength and drift control considerations are also interlinked, often resulting in overdesign of other elements, such as diaphragms and foundations. These drawbacks can be mitigated by introducing replaceable links at the locations of expected inelastic action. A five-story prototype MRF building with replaceable links in a high-seismic zone was designed. Four full-scale beam-to-column subassemblages representing the first floor exterior connections in the prototype building were experimentally evaluated. The results demonstrated that MRFs with replaceable flexural links can provide strength and ductility equivalent to existing MRFs while minimizing the effect of the added links on the elastic stiffness of the system. Finite-element models were then developed to capture the observed experimental responses, including local buckling, bolt slipping, and bolt bearing.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Financial support for this study was provided by the National Science and Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under the Collaborative Research and Development Grant Program, the Steel Structures Education Foundation (SSEF), and the Canadian Institute of Steel Construction (CISC). Test specimens were donated by Walters Inc., Hamilton, Canada. This in-kind support is kindly appreciated and gratefully acknowledged. The authors also express their appreciation to the technical staff of the Structural Engineering Laboratory at the University of Toronto for their invaluable assistance in the test program.
References
Abaqus [Computer software]. (2006). Hibbit, Karlsson, and Storensend, Inc., Providence, RI.
AISC. (2005a). Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications, ANSI/AISC 358-05, Chicago.
AISC. (2005b). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, including supplement No. 1, ANSI/AISC 341-05, Chicago.
Balut, N., and Gioncu, V. (2003). “Suggestion for an improved ‘dog-bone’ solution.” Proc., Stessa, Balkema, Lisse, Netherlands, 129–134.
Bruneau, M., Uang, C.-M., and Whittaker, A. (1998). Ductile design of steel structures, McGraw Hill, Boston.
Canadian Institute of Steel Construction (CISC). (2005). Moment connections for seismic applications, Willowdale, Ontario, Canada.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2001). “Limit states design of steel structures.” CSA Standard CAN/CSA-S16-01, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chambers, J. J., Almudhafar, S., and Stenger, F. (2003). “Effect of reduced beam section frame elements on stiffness of moment frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 129(3), 383–393.
El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T., Vidarsson, E., and Kunnath, S. K. (1998). “Strength and ductility of FR welded-bolted connections.” SAC Rep. No. 98-01, Structural Engineers Association of California, Applied Technology Council, and Consortium of Universities for Earthquake Engineering (SAC) Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.
Gilton, C. S., and Uang, C.-M. (2002). “Cyclic response and design recommendations of weak-axis reduced beam section moment connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 452–463.
Grubbs, K. (1997). “The effect of the dogbone connection on the elastic stiffness of steel moment frames.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil EngineeringUniv. of Toronto, Canada.
Iwankiw, N. (1997). “Ultimate strength considerations for seismic design of the reduced beam section (internal plastic hinge), including appendices A, B, C, and D.” Eng. J., 34(1), 3–16.
Iwankiw, N., and Mohammadi, J. (2004). “Elastic in-plane stiffness for a circular cut reduced beam section (RBS).” Eng. J., 41(1), 23–36.
Kim, T., Whittaker, A., Gilani, A. S. J., Bertero, V. V., and Takhirov, S. M. (2002). “Cover-plate and flange-plate reinforced steel moment resisting connections.” Rep. No. PEER 2000/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Kulak, G. L., Fisher, J. W., and Struik, J. H. A. (1987). Guide to design criteria for bolted and riveted joints, Wiley, New York.
Lee, C.-H., and Chung, S. W. (2007). “A simplified analytical story drift evaluation of steel moment frames with radius-cut reduced beam section.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 63(4), 564–570.
Mansour, N., Christopoulos, C., and Tremblay, R. (2006).“Seismic design of EBF steel frames using replaceable nonlinear links.” Proc., STESSA, F. Mazzolani, and A. Wada, eds., Taylor and Francis, Leiden, Netherlands, 745–750.
Moore, K. S., Malley, J. O., and Engelhardt, M. D. (1999). Design of reduced beam section (RBS) moment frame connections, Structural Steel Education Council, Moraga, CA.
National Research Council of Canada (NRCC). (2005). National building code of Canada, Ottawa.
Plumier, A. (1997). “The dogbone: Back to the future.” Eng. J., 34(2), 61–67.
Shen, Y. (2009). “Seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames with nonlinear replaceable links.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Canada.
Sumner, E. A. (2003). “Unified design of extended end-plate moment connections subject to cyclic loading.” M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Zhang, X., and Ricles, J. M. (2006). “Seismic behavior of reduced beam section moment connections to deep columns.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(3), 358–367.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 4, 2009
Accepted: Dec 15, 2010
Published online: Dec 17, 2010
Published in print: Oct 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.