Performance of Conventionally Reinforced Coupling Beams Subjected to Cyclic Loading
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 6
Abstract
The behavior of coupled-wall buildings primarily depends on the performance of coupling beams. Existing coupled-wall buildings designed and built prior to the 1970s contain coupling beams reinforced with horizontal and vertical bars. Seismic evaluation of these older buildings is commonly performed using nonlinear static or dynamic analyses techniques. Results from nonlinear analyses depend on the quality of backbone curves that characterize the behavior of the individual coupling beams. Backbone curve construction must, therefore, focus on reliable estimates of the strength and deformation values used to characterize the behavior of the structural component. This paper presents experimental results of four conventionally reinforced coupling beams designed to exhibit different behavior modes during cyclic loading. The effect of different amounts of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement on behavior is highlighted. The measured shear strength of the beams is compared with values calculated using existing equations. The deformation components that contributed to chord rotation are identified and discussed in light of response parameters, such as measured strains and observed cracking. The tests also highlight the importance of accounting for reduction in shear stiffness to accurately determine the deformation response of coupling beams.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
In-kind material donations for the construction of the coupling beam specimens from Barker Steel (Mr. Robert Brack) and Nucor Steel, Connecticut, are gratefully acknowledged.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2008). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-08/ACI 318R-08, Farmington Hills, MI, 430.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1999). “Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings—Basic procedures manual.” Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 306, Washington, DC, 250.
ASCE. (2006). “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings.” ASCE/SEI 41-06, Reston, VA, 416.
Barney, G. B., Shiu, K. N., Rabbat, B. G., Fiorato, A. E., Russell, H. G., and Corley, W. G. (1978). Earthquake resistant structural walls—tests of coupling beams, Research and Development Series No. 1583, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 152.
Fédération Internationale du Béton (FIB). (2003). “Seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings.” FIB Bull. 24, Lausanne, Switzerland, 306.
Ihtiyar, O., and Breña, S. F. (2006). “Force-deformation response of conventionally reinforced coupling beams: Evaluation of FEMA 356 and FEMA 306.” Proc., 8th Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Eng., San Francisco, Paper No. 701, 10.
Paulay, T. (1971). “Coupling beams of reinforced concrete shear walls.” J. Struct. Div., 97(3), 843–861.
Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Tassios, T. P., Moretti, M., and Bezas, A. (1996). “On the behavior and ductility of reinforced concrete coupling beams of shear walls.” ACI Struct. J., 93(6), 711–720.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 2, 2009
Accepted: Sep 12, 2010
Published online: Sep 22, 2010
Published in print: Jun 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.