TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 22, 2010

Near-Fault and Far-Field Strong Ground-Motion Simulation for Earthquake Engineering Applications Using the Specific Barrier Model

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 137, Issue 3

Abstract

Codes for aseismic design may require use of recorded ground motions as input in dynamic analysis. When records are not available, motions must be simulated. The specific barrier model (SBM) is particularly useful in this context because (1) it provides the most complete, yet parsimonious, self-consistent description of the earthquake faulting processes that are responsible for the generation of high-frequency radiation; (2) it has been calibrated to earthquakes of three different tectonic regions; and (3) its key parameter, the barrier interval, is related to the duration of the near-fault pulses (NFP), the most damaging feature of near-fault motions. We carry out “blind” (i.e., using the minimum amount of a priori source information) simulations of strong motions of well-recorded earthquakes of magnitudes between 6.2–7.6. We assess the quality of fit of the simulated time histories to the recorded motions and show that the simulations exhibit close to zero bias over frequencies of 0.1–20 Hz for the data set used. This exercise illustrates that the method will provide earthquake motions that can be used with confidence in aseismic design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Earthquake Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under Award Number NSFEEC-9701471 to the Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (Contract Numbers MCEER 00-0102, 01-0102, 02-0102, 03/0.1, and 04-0001). The first author would like to acknowledge additional support from the Icelandic Centre for Research (RANNIS) Project Grant No. UNSPECIFIED090049021.

References

Aki, K., Bouchon, M., Chouet, B., and Das, S. (1977). “Quantitative prediction of strong motion for a potential earthquake fault.” Annu. Rep. Inst. Geosci., Univ. Tsukuba, 30, 341–368.
Aki, K., and Papageorgiou, A. S. (1988). “Separation of source and site effects in acceleration power spectra of major California earthquakes.” 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Eng., Vol. VIII, Elsevier Applied Science, London, SB–8.
Aki, K., and Richards, P. G. (1980). Quantitative seismology: Theory and methods, Vols. I and II, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Alavi, B., and Krawinkler, H. (2004). “Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(6), 687–706.
Ambraseys, N., et al. (2004). “Internet site for European strong-motion data.” Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 45(3), 113–129.
Atkinson, G. M., and Silva, W. (2000). “Stochastic modeling of California ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90(2), 255–274.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). “Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(9), 1077–1095.
Beresnev, I., and Atkinson, G. M. (2001). “Subevent structure of large earthquakes—A ground-motion perspective.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(1), 53–56.
Boore, D. M. (2000). “SMSIM—Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes: Version 2.0—A revision of OFR 96-80-A.” Open-File Rep. OF 00-509, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.
Boore, D. M. (2003). “Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method.” Pure Appl. Geophys., 160, 635–676.
Boore, D. M., and Joyner, W. B. (1997). “Site amplifications for generic rock sites.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87(2), 327–341.
Bouchon, M., et al. (2002). “Space and time evolution of rupture and faulting during the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92(1), 256–266.
Chapman, M. C. (1995). “A probabilistic approach to ground-motion selection for engineering design.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 85(3), 937–942.
Chin, B., and Aki, K. (1991). “Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear effects.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 81(5), 1859–1884.
Halldórsson, B., Ólafsson, S., and Sigbjörnsson, R. (2007). “A fast and efficient simulation of the far-field and near-fault earthquake ground motions associated with the June 17 and 21, 2000, earthquakes in South Iceland.” J. Earthquake Eng., 11(3), 343–370.
Halldorsson, B., and Papageorgiou, A. S. (2005). “Calibration of the specific barrier model to earthquakes of different tectonic regions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 95(4), 1276–1300, 〈http://civil.eng.buffalo.edu/EngSeisLab/〉 (Jan. 1, 2010).
Halldorsson, B., and Papageorgiou, A. S. (2006). “Spectral variations of the specific barrier model from various isochron and subevent distributions.”Proc., 1st European Conf. on Earthquake Eng. and Seismology (1st ECEES) (CD-ROM), SYMPORG SA, Geneva, 137.
Hartzell, S. H. (1989). “Comparison of seismic waveform inversion techniques for the rupture history of a finite fault: Application to the 1986 North Palm Springs, California earthquake.” J. Geophys. Res., 94, 7515–7534.
Johnson, K. M., Hsu, Y., Segall, P., and Yu, S. (2001). “Fault geometry and slip distribution of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake imaged from inversion of GPS data.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(11), 2285–2288.
Joyner, W. B., and Boore, D. M. (1986). “On simulating large earthquakes by Green’s function addition of smaller earthquakes.” Earthquake source mechanics, Maurice Ewing series, S. Das et al., eds., Vol. 6, Amer. Geophys. Union, Washington, DC.
Kalkan, E., and Kunnath, S. K. (2006). “Effects of fling-step and forward directivity on the seismic response of buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 367–390.
Kanamori, H., and Allen, C. R. (1986). “Earthquake repeat time and average stress drop.” Earthquake source mechanics, Maurice Ewing series, S. Das et al., eds., Vol. 6, Amer. Geophys. Union, Washington, DC, 227–235.
Mai, M. (2000). “SRCMOD: Finite-source rupture model database.” 〈http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/srcmod/〉 (Jan. 1, 2010).
Mavroeidis, G. P., Dong, G., and Papageorgiou, A. S. (2004). “Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(9), 1023–1049.
Mavroeidis, G. P., and Papageorgiou, A. S. (2003). “A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93(3), 1099–1131.
Mavroeidis, G. P., Zhang, B., Dong, G., Papageorgiou, A. S., Dutta, U., and Biswas, N. N. (2008). “Estimation of strong ground motion from the Great 1964 Mw9.2 Prince William Sound, Alaska earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98(5), 2303–2324.
Papageorgiou, A. S. (1988). “On two characteristic frequencies of acceleration spectra: Patch corner frequency and fmax.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78, 509–529.
Papageorgiou, A. S. (2003). “The barrier model and strong ground motion.” Pure Appl. Geophys., 160, 603–634.
Papageorgiou, A. S., and Aki, K. (1982). “Aspects of the mechanics of earthquake rupture related to the generation of high-frequency waves and the prediction of strong ground motion.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 1(2), 67–74.
Papageorgiou, A. S., and Aki, K. (1983a). “A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. I. Description of the model.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73(3), 693–722.
Papageorgiou, A. S., and Aki, K. (1983b). “A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. Part II. Applications of the model.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 73(4), 953–978.
Papageorgiou, A. S., and Aki, K. (1984). “Erratum.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74(2), 794–795.
Pedersen, R., Jónsson, S., Árnadóttir, T., Sigmundsson, F., and Feigl, K. L. (2003). “Fault slip distribution of two June 2000 Mw6.5 earthquakes in South Iceland estimated from joint inversion of InSAR and GPS measurements.” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 213(3–4), 487–502.
Sato, T., and Hirasawa, T. (1973). “Body wave spectra from propagating shear cracks.” J. Phys. Earth, 21, 415–431.
Spudich, P., Joyner, W. B., Lindh, A. G., Boore, D. M., Margaris, B. M., and Fletcher, J. B. (1999). “SEA99: A revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89(5), 1156–1170.
Wald, D., Heaton, T., and Hudnut, K. (1996). “The slip history of the 1994 Northridge, California earthquake determined from strong-motion, teleseismic, GPS and leveling data.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86(1B), S49–S70.
Wells, D. L., and Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). “New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84(4), 974–1002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 137Issue 3March 2011
Pages: 433 - 444

History

Received: Nov 7, 2008
Accepted: Jul 22, 2009
Published online: Mar 22, 2010
Published in print: Mar 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Benedikt Halldórsson [email protected]
Assistant Research Professor, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of Iceland, Austurvegur 2A, IS-800 Selfoss, Iceland. E-mail: [email protected]; formerly, Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Environmental and Civil Eng., Faculty of Eng. and Natural Sciences, Univ. of Iceland, Austurvegur 2A, IS-800 Selfoss, Iceland.
George P. Mavroeidis, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Eng., The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064. E-mail: [email protected]
Apostolos S. Papageorgiou, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. of Patras, Patras 26500, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share