Technical Papers
Jul 7, 2022

Optimum Coefficient of Friction in FPS for Base Isolation of Building Frames

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27, Issue 4

Abstract

Base isolation of structures with a friction pendulum system (FPS) has been a topic of great interest for research in the past. The efficiency of the FPS system in isolating a structure depends upon a number of crucial parameters, of which the coefficient of friction plays the most important role. Herein, two methods are presented for determining the optimum value of the dynamic coefficient of friction (μFast), which provides the maximum possible reduction of significant engineering demand parameters (EDP) simultaneously. The optimum value of μFast and the percentage of reduction of EDPs are obtained with respect to the safety gap. The procedures for determining the optimum value of μFast are illustrated with an example of a 10-story building frame base isolated with FPS under both far-field and near-field earthquakes. The results of the study show that the reduction in the number of plastic hinges formed was highly sensitive to the variation of the coefficient of friction: reductions in other EDPs showed mild to moderate sensitivity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Amiri, G. G., H. Naderpour, and S. R. H. Vaez. 2010. “Numerical evaluation of base-isolated structures with the optimized distribution of LRB and FPS isolators.” In Vol. 8 of Proc., 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering 2010, Including Papers from the 4th Int. Tsunami Symp., 6315–6324. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Bhagat, S., and A. C. Wijeyewickrema. 2017. “Seismic response evaluation of base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings under bidirectional excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibr. 16 (2): 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0387-8.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2000. Plain and reinforced concrete—Code of practice. IS 456. New Delhi, India: Manak Bhawan.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016. Criteria for earthquake resistant Design of structures. IS 1893. New Delhi, India: Manak Bhawan.
Briseghella, B., T. Zordan, and E. M. Mazzarolo, and T. Liu. 2013. “Friction pendulum system as a retrofit technique for existing reinforced concrete building.” Struct. Eng. Int. 23 (2): 219–224. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613X13439149157759.
Calvi, P. M. 2018. “Historical development of friction-based seismic isolation systems.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 106 (Oct): 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.003.
Cancellara, D., and F. De Angelis. 2019. “Dynamic assessment of base isolation systems for irregular in plan structures: Response spectrum analysis vs nonlinear analysis.” Compos. Struct. 215 (Feb): 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.013.
Cardone, D., and G. Gesualdi. 2017. “Influence of residual displacements on the design displacement of spherical friction-based isolation systems.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 100 (Jun): 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.07.001.
Castaldo, P., and G. Amendola. 2021. “Optimal sliding friction coefficients for isolated viaducts and bridges: A comparison study.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 28 (12): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2838.
Castaldo, P., and M. Ripani. 2016. “Optimal design of friction pendulum system properties for isolated structures considering different soil conditions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 90 (Nov): 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.025.
Castaldo, P., and E. Tubaldi. 2018. “Influence of ground motion characteristics on the optimal single concave sliding bearing properties for base-isolated structures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 104 (Jun): 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.025.
Chung, L. L., P. S. Kao, C. Y. Yang, L. Y. Wu, and H. M. Chen. 2013. “Optimal frictional coefficient of the structural isolation system.” JVC/J. Vibr. Control 21 (3): 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546313487938.
Colato, G. P., A. E. Pigouni, M. G. Castellano, and S. Infanti. 2013. “Innovative materials for the seismic protection of structures: From research to application.” FIP Industriale (2013) Catalogue S04—Curved Surface Sliders. Accessed May 1, 2022. http://www.fipindustriale.it.
Constantinou, B. M., A. Member, A. Mokha, and A. Reinhorn. 1990. “Teflon bearings in base isolation. II: Modeling.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (2): 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:2(455).
Deringöl, A. H., and E. M. Güneyisi. 2019. “Effect of friction pendulum bearing properties on the behaviour of buildings subjected to seismic loads.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 125 (Jun): 105746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105746.
Dolce, M., D. Cardone, and F. Croatto. 2005. “Frictional behavior of steel-PTFE interfaces for seismic isolation.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 3 (1): 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-005-0187-9.
Fallah, N., and G. Zamiri. 2013. “Multi-objective optimal design of sliding base isolation using genetic algorithm.” Sci. Iran. 20 (1): 87–96.
Fenz, D. M., and M. C. Constantinou. 2007. “Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior: Experimental verification.” Earthquake Eng. and Struct. Dyn. 37 (2): 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.750.
Gandelli, E., P. Dubini, V. Quaglini, and M. G. Limongelli. 2015. “Numerical investigation of re-centring capability of friction pendulum isolators.” In 14th World Conf. on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation and Active Vibration Control of Structures, 1–15. San Diego: Anti-Seismic System International Society.
Greco, R., and G. C. Marano. 2016. “Robust optimization of base isolation devices under uncertain parameters.” JVC/J. Vibr. Control 22 (3): 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546314532670.
Khansefid, A. 2021. “Lifetime risk-based seismic performance assessment of buildings equipped with supplemental damping and base isolation systems under probable mainshock-aftershock scenarios.” Structures 34 (May): 3647–3666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.093.
Kumar, M., A. S. Whittaker, and M. C. Constantinou. 2015. “Characterizing friction in sliding isolation bearings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (9): 1409–1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2524.
Landi, L., G. Grazi, and P. P. Diotallevi. 2016. “Comparison of different models for friction pendulum isolators in structures subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 81 (Feb): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.016.
Lupăşteanu, V., L. Soveja, R. Lupăşteanu, and C. Chingălată. 2019. “Installation of a base isolation system made of friction pendulum sliding isolators in a historic masonry orthodox church.” Eng. Struct. 188 (Mar): 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.040.
Makris, N. 2019. “Seismic isolation: Early history.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48 (2): 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3124.
Mazza, F., and M. Mazza. 2016. “Nonlinear seismic analysis of irregular RC framed buildings base-isolated with friction pendulum system under near-fault excitations.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 90 (Nov): 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.028.
Mishra, S. K., B. K. Roy, and S. Chakraborty. 2013. “Reliability-based-design-optimization of base-isolated buildings considering stochastic system parameters subjected to random earthquakes.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 75 (Oct): 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.06.012.
Mokha, A., N. Amin, M. C. Constantinou, and V. Zayas. 1996. “Seismic isolation retrofit of large historic building.” J. Struct. Eng. 122 (3): 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(298).
Mokha, B. A., M. Constantinou, A. Member, and A. Reinhorn. 1990. “Teflon bearings in base isolation. I: Testing.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (2): 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:2(438).
Morgan, T. A., and S. A. Mahin. 2008. “The optimization of multi-stage friction pendulum isolators for loss mitigation considering a range of seismic hazards.” In Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing: Beijing Jiuhua International Conference and Exhibition Center.
Naeim, F., and J. M. Kelly. 1999. Design of seismic isolated structures: From theory to practice. New York: Wiley.
Panchal, V. R., and R. S. Jangid. 2011. “Performance of variable friction pendulum system for torsionally coupled structures.” JVC/J. Vibr. Control 18 (3): 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546311407536.
Pranesh, M., and R. Sinha. 2000. “VFPI: An isolation device for aseismic design.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29 (5): 603–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200005)29:5%3C603::AID-EQE927%3E3.0.CO;2-W.
Quaglini, V., P. Dubini, and C. Poggi. 2012. “Experimental assessment of sliding materials for seismic isolation systems.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 10 (2): 717–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9308-9.
Ruiz, S. E. 2012. “Uniform annual failure rate spectra for friction pendulum isolated structures.” In Vol. 22 of 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Tokyo: Japan Association of Earthquake Engineering.
Su, B. L., G. Ahmadi, and I. G. Tadjbakhsh. 1989. “Comparative study of base isolation systems.” J. Eng. Mech. 115 (9): 1976–1992. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:9(1976).
Tiampo, K. F., and R. Shcherbakov. 2012. “Seismicity-based earthquake forecasting techniques: Ten years of progress.” Tectonophysics 522 (Feb): 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.08.019.
Tsai, C. S., P. C. Lu, W. S. Chen, T. C. Chiang, C. T. Yang, and Y. C. Lin. 2008. “Finite element formulation and shaking table tests of the direction-optimized-friction-pendulum system.” Eng. Struct. 30 (9): 2321–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.023.
Van De Lindt, J. W., and Y. Jiang. 2014. “Empirical selection equation for friction pendulum seismic isolation bearings applied to multistory woodframe buildings.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 19 (3): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000198.
Weber, F., H. Distl, and C. Braun. 2016. “Isolation performance of optimized triple friction pendulum.” Int. Refereed J. Eng. Sci. 5 (12): 55–69.
Whittaker, D. 2016. “Seismic isolation—A structural engineer’s comparison of lead-rubber versus curved-surface-slider type isolation bearings.” In Proc., 2016 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE). Christchurch, New Zealand: Conslab, BBR Contech, EQC.
Xu, Y., T. Guo, and P. Yan. 2019. “Design optimization of triple friction pendulums for base-isolated high-rise buildings.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 22 (13): 2727–2740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219849840.
Yang, D., and K. Yang. 2016. “Multi-step prediction of strong earthquake ground motions and seismic responses of SDOF systems based on EMD-ELM method.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 85 (Jun): 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.03.015.
Yang, T., N. A. Mara, P. M. Calvi, R. Wiebe, M. O. Eberhard, and W. Berman. 2020. “Accounting for spectral shape in a simplified method of analyzing friction pendulum systems.” Eng. Struct. 222 (Nov): 111002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111002.
Zakupin, A. S., Y. N. Levin, N. V. Boginskaya, and O. A. Zherdeva. 2018. “Development of medium-term prediction methods: A case study of the August 14, 2016, Onor (Mw = 5.8) earthquake on Sakhalin.” Russ. Geol. Geophys. 59 (11): 1526–1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2018.10.012.
Zayas, V. A., S. S. Low, and S. A. Mahin. 1990. “A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation.” Earthquake Spectra 6 (2): 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585573.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27Issue 4November 2022

History

Received: Nov 29, 2021
Accepted: Apr 19, 2022
Published online: Jul 7, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 7, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, National Centre for Disaster Mitigation and Management, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302017, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-662X. Email: [email protected]
Shiv Dayal Bharati [email protected]
Professor, National Centre for Disaster Mitigation and Management, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302017, India. Email: [email protected]
Mahendra Kumar Shrimali [email protected]
Professor, National Centre for Disaster Mitigation and Management, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302017, India. Email: [email protected]
Tushar Kanti Datta [email protected]
Professor, National Centre for Disaster Mitigation and Management, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302017, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Sliding Isolation Systems: Historical Review, Modeling Techniques, and the Contemporary Trends, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12111997, 12, 11, (1997), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share