Technical Papers
Sep 22, 2021

Effect of Causality Filters of Accelerograms on Low-Rise Structure Responses

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27, Issue 1

Abstract

Because output accelerographs always contain noise, to use data in analysis and design of structures, there is a need for rational correction of raw data. These corrections include baseline correction, instrument correction, and filtration practices. In this paper, a 1-story steel moment frame and 3-story steel moment frame as benchmark have been used to study the effect of causal and acausal filtration. Accelerogram records have been used from five stations in successive earthquakes of Ahar-Varzaghan on August 11, 2012, and six stations that recorded the Sarpole-Zahab earthquake on November 12, 2017, for incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). The results show that the behavior of the representative structures by process of correction with causal and acausal filters in the elastic region, are roughly similar. Also the IDA summary curves show that the structures is subjected to higher intensity in acausal filters than in causal ones, so causal filtration in nonlinear analysis of low-rise structures seems to have more conservative responses in comparison with acausal one, not more than 15%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Building and Housing Research Center of Iran for providing them with the accelerograms and shear-wave velocities used in the current study.

References

Ansari, A., A. Noorzad, H. Zafarani, and H. Vahidifard. 2010. “Correction of highly noisy strong motion records using a modified wavelet denoising method.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (11): 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.025.
ASCE. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bayati, Z., and M. Soltani. 2016. “Ground motion selection and scaling for seismic design of RC frames against collapse.” Earthquake Struct. 11 (3): 445–459. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.445.
Behnamfar, F., and M. Talebi Velni. 2019. “A rapid screening method for selection and modification of ground motions for time history analysis.” Earthquake Struct. 16 (1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.1.029.
Boore, D. M. 2001. “Effect of baseline corrections on displacement and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan, earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91 (5): 1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000703.
Boore, D. M. 2008. TSPP: A collection of FORTRAN programs for processing and manipulating time series. Washington, DC: USGS.
Boore, D. M., and S. Akkar. 2003. “Effect of causal and acausal filters on elastic and inelastic response spectra.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (11): 1729–1748. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.299.
Boore, D. M., A. Azari Sisi, and S. Akkar. 2012. “Using pad-stripped acausally filtered strong-motion data.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 102 (2): 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110222.
Boore, D. M., and J. J. Bommer. 2005. “Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: Needs, options and consequences.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 25 (2): 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.007.
Boore, D. M., C. D. Stephens, and W. B. Joyner. 2002. “Comments on baseline correction of digital strong-motion data: Examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 (4): 1543–1560. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000926.
Building and Housing Research Center. 2015. Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. Iran National Standard No. 2800, 4th ed. Tehran, Iran: Building and Housing Research Center.
Converse, M., and A. G. Brady. 1992. BAP basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software version 1.0. Washington, DC: USGS.
Ergun, M., and S. Ates. 2014. “Comparing of the effects of scaled and real earthquake records on structural response.” Earthquake Struct. 6 (4): 375–392. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.4.375.
FEMA. 2000. State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking: The SAC Joint Venture for the federal emergency management agency. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2001. Seismic design criteria for steel moment-frame structures. FEMA 350. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Goulet, A. C., et al. 2014. PEER NGA-east database. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Goyal, Armit, and Pankaj Agarwal. 2017. “Earthquake-Resistant Interlinked Block Masonry System with Energy Dissipator Viscoelastic Links.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr 22 (3), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000319.
Graizer, V. M. 1979. “Determination of the true ground displacement by using strong motion records.” Izv. Phys. Solid Earth 15 (12): 875–885.
Gupta, I. D. 2017. “Uniformly processed strong motion database for Himalaya and northeast region of India.” Pure Appl. Geophys. 175 (3): 829–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1703-y.
ISMN (Iran Strong Motion Network). 2018. “Road, housing and urban development research center.” Iran strong motion database. Accessed June 1, 2018. http://www.ismn.bhrc.ac.ir.
Iwan, W. D., M. A. Moser, and C. Y. Peng. 1985. “Some observations on strong-motion earthquake measurement using a digital accelerograph.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75 (5): 1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0750051225.
Jalayer, F. 2003. “Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: Implementing non-linear dynamic assessments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Krishnan, S., and M. Muto. 2012. “Mechanism of collapse of tall steel moment-frame buildings under earthquake excitation.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (11): 1361–1387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000573.
Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. 2011. “Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (11): 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.
Luco, N., and C. A. Cornell. 2007. “Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 357–392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES) user manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Mollova, G. 2007. “Effects of digital filtering in data processing of seismic acceleration records.” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2007: 29502–29511. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/29502.
NIST. 2010. Evaluation of the FEMA P695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors. Gaithersburg, MD: NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2005. “PEER ground motion database.” Accessed May 1, 2018. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu.
Sakkas, G., and N. Sakellariou. 2018. “An algorithm developed in MATLAB for the automatic selection of cutoff frequencies, in the correction of strong motion data.” Acta Geophys. 66 (4): 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0150-1.
Samaei, M., M. Miyajima, and N. Nojima. 2016. “Attenuation of Fourier spectra for 2012 Ahar-Varzaghan earthquakes, northwestern Iran.” J. Earth Space Phys. 41 (4): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.22059/jesphys.2015.56029.
Shahryari, H., M. R. Karami, and A. Chiniforush. 2019. “Summarized IDA curves by the wavelet transform and bees optimization algorithm.” Earthquake Struct. 16 (2): 165–175. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.2.165.
Shome, N., C. A. Cornell, P. Bazzurro, and J. E. Carballo. 1998. “Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.” Earthquake Spectra 14 (3): 469–500. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011.
Trifunac, M. D. 1971. “Zero baseline correction of strong-motion accelerograms.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 61 (5): 1201–1211.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Zafarani, H., and M. R. Soghrat. 2017. “A selected dataset of the Iranian strong motion records.” Nat. Hazards 86 (3): 1307–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2745-2.
Zare, M., and P. Y. Bard. 2002. “Strong motion dataset of Turkey: Data processing and site classification.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 22 (8): 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00028-3.
Zerva, A., H. Morikawa, and S. Sawada. 2012. “Criteria for processing response-spectrum-compatible seismic accelerations simulated via spectral representation.” Earthquake Struct. 3 (3): 341–363. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.3_4.341.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 27Issue 1February 2022

History

Received: Feb 13, 2021
Accepted: Jul 23, 2021
Published online: Sep 22, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Mashhad Branch, Mashhad 9178684573, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2590-1051. Email: [email protected]
Mohammad Sadegh Khakpour https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-6499
Researcher, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Mashhad Branch, Mashhad 9188853846, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-6499

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share