Technical Papers
Feb 10, 2021

Enhancing Building Resistance to Differential Settlement with Canadian Seismic Design Provisions

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 26, Issue 2

Abstract

This research project focuses on evaluating the influence of Canadian seismic design provisions on the resistance of reinforced concrete buildings against the differential settlement of their foundation. Three types of moment-resisting frame buildings located in Vancouver, Montreal, and Toronto were designed in accordance with the latest editions of the [NRCC (National Research Council Canada). 2010. National building code of Canada. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada]. The buildings in each location were designed for three span lengths, namely, 4, 6, and 8  m. A total of nine finite-element models were developed using SAP2000 version 20 with structural element nonlinearity being represented through plastic hinges at the ends of beams and columns. A nonlinear analysis was performed on each model by gradually subjecting a center column to a settlement of 100 mm. The analysis reveals that buildings with a shorter span (e.g., 4  m) length are more vulnerable to settlement-induced damage than buildings with longer spans (e.g., 8  m). Failure of the settling column occurs at settlements that exceed the range of maximum allowable differential settlements prescribed in the Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The following items are available upon request: settlement-induced demand–capacity ratios for Columns B-3 and C-3 for 4-, 6-, and 8-m-span buildings in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver; demand–capacity ratios for Column B-3 due to combined gravity and settlement loads for 4-, 6-, and 8-m-span buildings in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver; moments at the far end of Beam B-3–C-3 in 4-, 6-, and 8-m-span buildings. The aforementioned data are also available in Desbrousses (2020).

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 1992. Building code requirements for reinforced concrete. ACI 318-89. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Alabi, S., I. Arighaye, and J. Afolayan. 2020. “Progressive failure analysis of multi-storey reinforced concrete buildings under differential settlement.” J. Eng. Eng. Technol. 14 (1): 85–92.
Anastasopoulos, A. 2013. “Structural damage of a 5-story building: Differential settlement due to construction of an adjacent building or because of construction defects.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. Rolla, MO: Center for Transportation Infrastructure and Safety.
Beller, H. S. 1997. “Method used to salvage warehouse subjected to severe settlement.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2 (3): 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(1997)2:3(131).
Boone, S. J. 1996. “Ground-movement-related building damage.” J. Geotech. Eng. 122 (11): 886–896. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:11(886).
Boscardin, M. D., and E. J. Cording. 1989. “Building response to excavation-induced settlement.” J. Geotech. Eng. 115 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:1(1).
Burland, J., and C. Wroth. 1975. “Settlement of buildings and associated damage.” In Proc., British Geotechnical Society’s Conf. on the Settlement of Structures. Cambridge, UK: British Geotechnical Society.
CGS (Canadian Geotechnical Society). 2006. Canadian foundation engineering manual. Calgary, AB, Canada: CGS.
CSA Group. 2014. Design of concrete structures. CSA A23.3-14. Ottawa: CSA Group.
Desbrousses, R. 2020. “Enhancing building resistance to differential settlement with Canadian seismic design provisions.” MASc thesis, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ.
FEMA. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Finno, R. J., F. T. Voss Jr., E. Rossow, and J. T. Blackburn. 2005. “Evaluating damage potential in buildings affected by excavations.” J. Geotech. Eng. 131 (10): 1199–1210. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:10(1199).
Halim, D., and K. S. Wong. 2012. “Prediction of frame structure damage resulting from deep excavation.” J. Geotech. Eng. 138 (12): 1530–1536. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000682.
Haydl, H. M., and A. W. Nikiel. 2000. “Design and construction errors—Case studies.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 5 (3): 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2000)5:3(126).
Karthik, M. 2009. “Stress-strain model of unconfined and confined concrete and stress block parameters.” MASc thesis, Zachry Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Karthik, M., and J. Mander. 2011. “Stress-block parameters for unconfined and confined concrete based on a unified stress-strain model.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (2): 270–273.
Kim, Y. J., S. Gajan, and M. Saafi. 2011. “Settlement rehabilitation of a 35-year-old building: Case study integrated with analysis and implementation.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 16 (4): 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000092.
Kumar, M. S., and P. Jayabalan. 2010. “Interplanar and intraplanar differential settlement analyses of boiler supporting structure: Comparative study.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 15 (1): 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000029.
Lahri, A., and V. Garg. 2015. “Effect of differential settlement on frame forces.” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 4 (9): 453–464. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2015.0409083.
Lazarus, D., and H. Jung. 2018. “Damage assessment and monitoring for buildings on the Elizabeth line.” Struct. Eng. 96 (7): 14–24.
Lin, L., A. Hanna, A. Sinha, and L. Tirca. 2015. “Structural response to differential settlement of its foundations.” J. Civ. Eng. Res. 5 (3): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20150503.02.
Lin, L., A. Hanna, A. Sinha, and L. Tirca. 2017. “Performance of high-rise building subjected to excessive differential settlement of its foundation.” Int. J. Struct. Integrity 8 (2): 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-05-2016-0019.
Mair, R., R. Taylor, and J. Burland. 1996. “Prediction of ground movements and assessments of risk of building damage due to bored tunelling.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Meyerhof, G. 1947. “The settlement analysis of building frames.” Struct. Eng. 25 (9): 369–409.
NRCC (National Research Council Canada). 2010. National building code of Canada. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada.
NRCC (National Research Council Canada). 2015. National building code of Canada. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada.
Polshin, D., and R. Tokar. 1957. “Maximum allowable non-uniform settlement of structures.” In Proc., Int. Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 402–405. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Rouhani, F., L. Lin, and K. Galal. 2018. “Developing a plastic hinge model for reinforced concrete beams prone to progressive collapse.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 45 (6): 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2016-0326.
Sarkar, R., S. Dutta, R. Saw, and J. Singh. 2020. “Effect of differential settlement on seismic response of building structures.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 173 (3): 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmuen.18.00032.
Skempton, A., and D. MacDonald. 1956. “The allowable settlements of buildings.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 5 (6): 727–763. https://doi.org/10.1680/ipeds.1956.12202.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 26Issue 2May 2021

History

Received: Sep 15, 2020
Accepted: Dec 9, 2020
Published online: Feb 10, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jul 10, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Romaric Léo Esteban Desbrousses, S.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-6812 [email protected]
Formerly, Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G1M8 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-6812. Email: [email protected]
Lan Lin, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G1M8.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share