Demand and Supply of Rotational Ductility in Flexible Extended Shear Tab Connections
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 26, Issue 2
Abstract
Extended shear tab connections have a long history in the steel construction industry as a practical solution to many framing problems, such as framing the supported member to the weak axis of a column without the need for coping. Extended shear tab connections were introduced to the AISC Manual in 1992 as they allow greater geometric variation to the counter conventional configuration. The use of extended tab connections, however, comes to a position of concern when the connection flexibility is not satisfied. Higher rigidity of the connection could result in unanticipated moment development in the column that may cause yield mechanism failure due to substantial distortions in the flexible column web or sudden rupture of the bolts or weld. The excess deformation also causes a shift in the connection rotation to the weld centerline, thus limiting the relative end beam rotation. To address these concerns, a parametric study was performed to evaluate the effect of plate thickness, a-distance (distance between bolt line and weld line), skewed angle, number of bolts, and number of bolt columns. These parameters were evaluated in terms of shear strength, corresponding beam end rotation, support rotation, unanticipated moment, and connection failure mechanisms. It was observed that when the tab is connected to flexible supports the connection rotation is partially accommodated by the support, which could result in excessive distortions in the support. The a-distance is the parameter that mostly affects such behavior. Further, connections with multiple bolt columns showed most of their inelastic rotational behavior at the first column of bolts.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request (deflection values of the constituent members for each tested model).
References
ABAQUS. 2013. Analysis user’s guide, version 6.13. Waltham, MA: Dassault Systèmes Solidworks Corporation.
Abou-Zidan, A., and Y. Liu. 2015. “Numerical study of unstiffened extended shear tab connections.” J. Contr. Steel Res. 107 (Apr): 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.008.
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2005. Steel construction manual. 13th ed. Chicago: AISC.
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2010. Steel construction manual. 14th ed. Chicago: AISC.
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2016. Steel construction manual. 15th ed. Chicago: AISC.
Al Hijaj, M., and M. Mahamid. 2017a. “Behavior of skewed extended shear tab connections part I: Connection to supporting web.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 128 (Jan): 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.08.024.
Al Hijaj, M., and M. Mahamid. 2017b. “Parametric study and design procedure for skewed extended shear-tab connections.” In Practice periodical on structural design and construction. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Astaneh, A., S. M. Call, and K. M. McMullin. 1989. “Design of single plate shear connections.” Eng. J. 26 (1): 21–32.
ASTM. 1985. High-strength bolts for structural steel joints. ASTM A325-84. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baldwin Metzger, K. A. 2006. “Experimental verification of a new single plate shear connection design model.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech.
Creech, D. D. 2005. “Behavior of single plate shear connections with rigid and flexible supports.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ.
Kloiber, L., and W. Thornton. 2001. “Design of skewed connections.” Eng. J. 38 (3): 140–147.
Kulak, G. L., J. W. Fisher, and J. H. A. Struik. 2001. Guide to design criteria for bolted and riveted joints. 2nd ed. Chicago: AISC.
Mahamid, M., and M. Al Hijaj. 2016. “Behavior of stiffened skewed extended shear tab connections.” In Proc., Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress Conf., 163–176. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mahamid, M., and M. Al Hijaj. 2017. “Behavior of skewed extended shear tab connections part II: Connection to supporting flange.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 128 (Jan): 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.08.025.
Mahamid, M., A. Rahman, and A. Ghorbanpoor. 2007. “The analyses of extended shear tab steel connections part II: Stiffened connections.” Eng. J. 44 (2): 133–146.
Muir, L. S., and C. M. Hewitt. 2009. “Design of unstiffened extended single plate shear connections.” Eng. J. 46 (2): 67–80.
Rahman, A., M. Mahamid, A. Amro, and A. Ghorbanpoor. 2007. “The analyses of extended shear tab steel connections part I: The unstiffened connections.” Eng. J. 16 (2): 52. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2012.16.2.47.
Richard, R. M., P. E. Gillet, J. D. Kriegh, and B. A. Lewis. 1980. “The analysis and design of single plate framing connections.” Eng. J. 17 (2): 33–52.
Sherman, D. R., and A. Ghorbanpoor. 2002. Design of extended shear tabs. Milwaukee, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin.
Thornton, W. A., and P. J. Fortney. 2011. “On the need for stiffeners for and the effect of lap eccentricity on extended single-plate connections.” Eng. J. 48 (2): 117–126.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 13, 2020
Accepted: Dec 2, 2020
Published online: Feb 9, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jul 9, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.