Technical Papers
Jun 22, 2020

Industry Survey for Determining the State of Practice of Front End Engineering Design for Industrial Construction

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 25, Issue 4

Abstract

Planning work conducted early during a construction project, known as front end planning (FEP), has a large impact on project outcomes and significant influence on the configuration of the final project. As a key component of FEP, front end engineering design (FEED) plays an essential role in the overall success of large industrial projects. This work was motivated by the existing confusion about the quality and completeness of the desired engineering deliverables at the end of FEED. The objective of this research was to determine the perception of the FEED process by administering a thorough survey to experienced FEED professionals working on industrial projects. A key finding of the survey is that the industry lacks a consistent, agreed-upon FEED definition, which causes industry misunderstandings. To address this gap, a comprehensive FEED definition was developed based on the 80 survey responses received, and builds on the existing literature. The contributions of this work include: (1) developing a tested FEED definition for the large industrial projects sector; (2) determining the industry’s state of practice for measuring FEED deliverables; and (3) reaffirming that 30% of engineering design complete is a threshold for FEED. These contributions to the FEED body of knowledge will add consistency and clarity regarding FEED for large industrial projects, promoting the alignment of academics and project stakeholders on a common understanding of FEED and improving communication about FEED expectations. In addition, this work is intended to serve as a foundation and definition for future FEED research.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Construction Industry Institute as part of CII Research Team 331. The authors thank all industry professionals who participated in this work.

References

AACE (Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International). 2016. Cost estimate classification system—As applied in engineering, procurement, and construction for the process industries. Morgantown, WV: AACE.
Bates, J., C. D. J. Burton, R. C. Creese, J. K. Hollmann, K. K. Humphreys, D. F. McDonald Jr., and C. A. Miller. 2013. Cost estimate classification system. Morgantown, WV: AACE.
Bingham, E., and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2016. “Infrastructure project scope definition using project definition rating index.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (2): 04016037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000483.
Chancey, R., T. Sputo, E. Minchin, and J. Turner. 2005. “Justifiable precision and accuracy in structural engineering calculations: In search of a little less precision and supposed accuracy.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 10 (3): 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2005)10:3(154).
Chiyoda Corporation. 2018. “FEED (front end engineering design) Chiyoda Corporation.” Accessed May 22, 2018. https://www.chiyodacorp.com/en/service/ple/feed/.
Cho, C. S., and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2000. “Development of a project definition rating index (PDRI) for general building projects.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World, 343–352. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chokor, A., M. El Asmar, and B. Sai Paladugu. 2016. “Quantifying the impact of cost-based incentives on the performance of building projects in the United States.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 22 (2): 04016024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000312.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2006a. Data analysis in support of front end planning implementation. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2006b. Front end planning: Break the rules, pay the price. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2013a. Assessment of effective front end planning process. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2013b. Integrated project risk assessment. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). 2014. Front end planning toolkit 2014.1. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Collins, W., K. Parrish, and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2017. “Development of a project scope definition and assessment tool for small industrial construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (4): 04017015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000514.
Dumont, P. R., G. E. Gibson Jr., and J. R. Fish. 1997. “Scope management using project definition rating index.” J. Manage. Eng. 13 (5): 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:5(54).
El Asmar, M., G. E. Gibson Jr., D. Ramsey, A. Yussef, and Z. Ud Din. 2018. The maturity and accuracy of front end engineering design (FEED) and its impact on project performance. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
ElZomor, M., R. Burke, K. Parrish, and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2018. “Front-end planning for large and small infrastructure projects: Comparison of project definition rating index tools.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (4): 04018022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000611.
EPC Engineer. 2018. “FEED—Front end engineering design.” Accessed May 22, 2018. https://www.epcengineer.com/definition/556/feed-front-end-engineering-design.
Fluor. 2018. “Front-end engineering design (FEED) capabilities.” Accessed May 22, 2018. http://www.fluor.com/services/engineering/front-end-engineering-design.
Gibson, G. E., and P. R. Dumont. 1995. Project definition rating index (PDRI) for industrial projects. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute, The Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Gibson, G. E., Jr., J. H. Kaczmarowski, and H. E. Lore Jr. 1995. “Preproject-planning process for capital facilities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 121 (3): 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:3(312).
González, V., L. F. Alarcón, S. Maturana, F. Mundaca, and J. Bustamante. 2010. “Improving planning reliability and project performance using the reliable commitment model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (10): 1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000215.
Griffith, A. F., and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2001. “Alignment during preproject planning.” J. Manage. Eng. 17 (2): 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:2(69).
Hamilton, M. R., and G. E. Gibson Jr. 1996. “Benchmarking preproject planning effort.” J. Manage. Eng. 12 (2): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:2(25).
Hastak, M., and C. Koo. 2016. “Theory of an intelligent planning unit for the complex built environment.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04016046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000486.
Ikpe, E., J. Kumar, and G. Jergeas. 2014. “Analysis of the usage of the CII/COAA benchmarking and project performance assessment system.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 20 (4): 04014053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000250.
Javanmardi, A., S. A. Abbasian-Hosseini, M. Liu, and S. M. Hsiang. 2017. “Benefit of cooperation among subcontractors in performing high-reliable planning.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (2): 04017062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000578.
Jergeas, G. F., and J. Ruwanpura. 2010. “Why cost and schedule overruns on mega oil sands projects?” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 15 (1): 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000024.
Kim, D. Y., C. L. Menches, and J. T. O’Connor. 2013. “Stringing construction planning and execution tasks together for effective project management.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (3): 04014042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000267.
Kim, S. C., Y. W. Kim, K. S. Park, and C. Y. Yoo. 2014. “Impact of measuring operational-level planning reliability on management-level project performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (5): 05014021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000326.
Merrow, E. W. 2011. Industrial megaprojects: Concepts, strategies, and practices for success. New York: Wiley.
Oberlender, G. D., and S. M. Trost. 2001. “Predicting accuracy of early cost estimates based on estimate quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (3): 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:3(173).
O’Connor, J. T., J. O. Choi, and M. Winkler. 2016. “Critical success factors for commissioning and start-up of capital projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (11): 04016060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001179.
O’Connor, J. T., W. J. O’Brien, and J. O. Choi. 2013. Industrial modularization: How to optimize; how to maximize. Austin, TX: Univ. of Austin.
Rockwell Automation. 2018. “Front-end engineering and design (FEED).” Accessed May 22, 2018. http://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/br/ssb-br011_-en-p.pdf.
Schaschke, C. 2014. A dictionary of chemical engineering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Technip. 2018. “Front end engineering design (FEED).” Accessed May 22, 2018. http://www.technip.com/en/our-business/services/engineering.
Whittington, D. A., and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2009. “Development of the STAR tool for the management of shutdown/turnaround/outage projects.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress. Seattle, WA: ASCE.
Wu, W., and R. R. A. Issa. 2014. “BIM execution planning in green building projects: LEED as a use case.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (1): A4014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000314.
Yates, J. K. 2014. “Design and construction for sustainable industrial construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (4): B4014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000673.
Yussef, A., M. El Asmar, D. Ramsey, and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2017. “Front end engineering design (FEED) for large industrial projects: Industry perceptions and state of practice.” In Proc., Engineering Project Organization Conf. Lake Tahoe, CA: Engineering Project Organizations Conference.
Yussef, A., G. E. Gibson Jr., M. El Asmar, and D. Ramsey. 2019. “Quantifying FEED maturity and its impact on project performance in large industrial projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (5): 04019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000702.
Yussef, A., G. E. Gibson Jr., M. E. El Asmar, and D. Ramsey. Forthcoming. “Front end engineering design (FEED) for large industrial projects: Quantifying FEED maturity and its impact on project performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (5): 04019021. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481295.001.
Yussef, A., G. E. Gibson Jr., M. E. El Asmar, and D. Ramsey. 2018. “Front end engineering design (FEED) for large industrial projects: FEED maturity and its impact on project cost and schedule performance.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress. New Orleans, LA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 25Issue 4November 2020

History

Received: Jan 15, 2019
Accepted: Mar 12, 2020
Published online: Jun 22, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 22, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Del E. Webb School of Construction, Arizona State Univ., 660 South College Ave., Room 475, Tempe, AZ 85287. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-6170. Email: [email protected]
G. Edward Gibson Jr., Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-5511 [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., 660 South College Ave., Room 527b, Tempe, AZ 85287. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-5511. Email: [email protected]
Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor and Co-Director of the National Center of Excellence on SMART Innovations, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
David Ramsey, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Instructor, Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure, and Sustainability, Florida International Univ., 10555 W Flagler St., Room EC 2952, Miami, FL 33174. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share