Technical Notes
Mar 12, 2020

A Heuristic Approach to Forecasting the Delivery Time of Major Project Deliverables

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 25, Issue 2

Abstract

Having a simple and practical approach to forecast project milestones is extremely valuable to managers, especially in megaprojects in which the stakes are high. This paper, based on past records of similarly completed projects, suggests a heuristic method to forecast these completion times in a practical way. The findings of this study are of interest to practitioners, especially to project, portfolio, and high-ranking senior managers who seek a pragmatic forecasting of their ongoing projects. In this exploratory research, available forecasting methods used to predict the duration of a project based on the types of data sources were first reviewed. Next, a Heuristic Estimation Method (HEM) was suggested, in which data from similarly completed megaprojects are used to predict the completion time of an ongoing megaproject. This method was then tested on a selected number of ongoing offshore oil and gas megaprojects to forecast their delivery dates. At the end and upon completion, the predicted dates were compared with the actual completion dates of the selected megaprojects. Results show that the suggested approach was able to forecast the delivery dates within an acceptable margin of error.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. These items include the actual data of the project studied, such as the completion times of the project are restricted. Other types of data such as models, or code generated, or used during the study are available, if requested.

References

Acebes, F., M. Pereda, D. Poza, J. Pajares, and J. M. Galán. 2015. “Stochastic earned value analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and statistical learning techniques.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (7): 1597–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.012.
Aliverdi, R., L. M. Naeni, and A. Salehipour. 2013. “Monitoring project duration and cost in a construction project by applying statistical quality control charts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (3): 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.005.
Anbari, F. T. 2003. “Earned value project management method and extensions.” Project Manage. J. 34 (4): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280303400403.
Barraza, G. A., W. E. Back, and F. Mata. 2004. “Probabilistic forecasting of project performance using stochastic S curves.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(25).
Basu, R. 2014. “Managing quality in projects: An empirical study.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (1): 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.003.
Batselier, J., and M. Vanhoucke. 2017. “Improving project forecast accuracy by integrating earned value management with exponential smoothing and reference class forecasting.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (1): 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.003.
Buehler, R., and D. Griffin. 2003. “Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions.” Organizational Behav. Human Decis. Processes 92 (1–2): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00089-X.
Buehler, R., D. Griffin, and M. Ross. 1994. “Exploring the planning fallacy: Why people underestimate their task completion times.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 67 (3): 366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366.
Caron, F., F. Ruggeri, and A. Merli. 2013. “A Bayesian approach to improve estimate at completion in earned value management.” Project Manage. J. 44 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21303.
Choong Kog, Y. 2018. “Major construction delay factors in Portugal, the UK, and the US.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 23 (4): 04018024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000389.
de Andrade, P. A., A. Martens, and M. Vanhoucke. 2019. “Using real project schedule data to compare earned schedule and earned duration management project time forecasting capabilities.” Autom. Constr. 99 (Mar): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.030.
Dehghan, R., K. Hazini, and J. Ruwanpura. 2015. “Optimization of overlapping activities in the design phase of construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 59 (Nov): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.08.004.
Dehghan, R., and J. Y. Ruwnapura. 2014. “Model of trade-off between overlapping and rework of design activities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (2): 04013043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000786.
Jacob, D. 2003. “Forecasting project schedule completion with earned value metrics.” Measurable News 1 (11): 7–9.
Jergeas, G. F., and J. Ruwanpura. 2010. “Why cost and schedule overruns on mega oil sands projects?” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 15 (1): 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000024.
Kahneman, D., and D. Lovallo. 1993. “Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking.” Manage. Sci. 39 (1): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Intuitive predictions: Biases and corrective procedures.” TIMS Stud. Manage. Sci. 12 (1): 313–327.
Khamooshi, H., and A. Abdi. 2017. “Project duration forecasting using earned duration management with exponential smoothing techniques.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (1): 04016032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000475.
Khamooshi, H., and H. Golafshani. 2014. “EDM: Earned duration management, a new approach to schedule performance management and measurement.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (6): 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.11.002.
Lipke, W. 2003. “Schedule is different.” Measurable News 31 (4): 31–34.
Lipke, W. H. 2006. “Earned schedule leads to improved forecasting.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Project Management (ProMAC 2006). Washington, DC: Earned Schedule. https://www.earnedschedule.com/Docs/Earned%20Schedule%20Leads%20to%20Improved%20Forecasting.pdf.
Mortaji, S. T. H., R. Noorossana, and M. Bagherpour. 2015. “Project completion time and cost prediction using change point analysis.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (5): 04014086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000329.
Nadafi, S., S. H. Moosavirad, and S. Ariafar. 2019. “Predicting the project time and costs using EVM based on gray numbers.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (1): 2107. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2018-0291.
Sanna, L. J., and N. Schwarz. 2004. “Integrating temporal biases: The interplay of focal thoughts and accessibility experiences.” Psychol. Sci. 15 (7): 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00704.x.
Vandevoorde, S., and M. Vanhoucke. 2006. “A comparison of different project duration forecasting methods using earned value metrics.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (4): 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.10.004.
Vanhoucke, M. 2014. Integrated project management and control: First come the theory, then the practice. Management for professionals. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Warburton, R. D. 2011. “A time-dependent earned value model for software projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (8): 1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.008.
Warburton, R. D., and D. F. Cioffi. 2016. “Estimating a project’s earned and final duration.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (8): 1493–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.007.
Wauters, M., and M. Vanhoucke. 2016. “A comparative study of artificial intelligence methods for project duration forecasting.” Expert Syst. Appl. 46 (Mar): 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.008.
Wauters, M., and M. Vanhoucke. 2017. “A nearest neighbour extension to project duration forecasting with artificial intelligence.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 259 (3): 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.018.
Willems, L. L., and M. Vanhoucke. 2015. “Classification of articles and journals on project control and earned value management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (7): 1610–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 25Issue 2May 2020

History

Received: May 21, 2019
Accepted: Oct 30, 2019
Published online: Mar 12, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 12, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Reza Dehghan [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sharif Univ. of Technology, Tehran 89694-14588, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Mohammad Mehdi Mortaheb [email protected]
Director, Construction Engineering Specialization, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sharif Univ. of Technology, Tehran 89694-14588, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Ali Fathalizadeh [email protected]
Former Graduate Student, Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif Univ. of Technology, Tehran 89694-14588, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share