Technical Papers
Sep 26, 2019

Development of a Construction Project Bidding Decision-Making Tool

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 25, Issue 1

Abstract

Given the increasingly competitive environment in the construction industry, investigating the bidding strategies and the influential factors on bidding decisions has become a topic of research since the mid-1950s. To date, numerous decision-making tools have been developed to assist contractors in making bid/no-bid decisions. Despite the excessive availability of the decision-making tools, their utilization rate is very low. Therefore, a practical and user-centered tool to help with the bid/no-bid decisions is needed. The purpose of this study is to develop a practical decision-making tool to assist decision makers in making construction project bidding decisions and selecting the most appropriate projects to bid on using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Two illustrative examples, based on hypothetical case studies, are also provided to describe the implementation process of the developed decision-making tool.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data (responses from Employee X and Employee Y) and the Microsoft Excel-based decision-making model are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

Ahmad, I. 1990. “Decision-support system for modeling bid no-bid decision problem.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 (4): 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:4(595).
Ahmad, I., and I. Minkarah. 1988. “Questionnaire survey on bidding in construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 4 (3): 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:3(229).
Akalp, D., and M. E. Ozbek. 2016. “Differences in construction companies’ preferences in making bid/no bid decisions.” In Proc., EURO MED SEC 1 Conf.: Interaction between Theory and Practice in Civil Engineering and Construction, 343–348. Fargo, ND: ISEC Press.
Akalp, D., and M. E. Ozbek. 2017. “Identifying the weights assigned to the key bidding factors by different groups of construction companies.” In Proc., 53rd Annual Int. Conf. on Associated Schools of Construction, 577–584. Fort Collins, CO: ASC.
Bageis, A. S., and C. Fortune. 2009. “Factors affecting the bid/no bid decision in the Saudi Arabian construction contractors.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 27 (1): 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802596220.
Burke, R. 1999. Project management: Planning and control techniques. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Chen, Y. Q., S. J. Zhang, L. S. Liu, and J. Hu. 2015. “Risk perception and propensity in bid/no-bid decision-making of construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 22 (1): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2013-0011.
Chisala, M. L. 2017. “Quantitative bid or no-bid decision-support model for contractors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (12): 04017088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001407.
Chua, D. K. H., D. Z. Li, and W. T. Chan. 2001. “Case-based reasoning approach in bid decision making.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (1): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:1(35).
Deng, P.-S. 1994. “Using case-based reasoning for decision support.” In Proc., 27th Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, 552–561. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Egemen, M., and A. Mohamed. 2008. “SCBMD: A knowledge-based system software for strategically correct bid/no bid and mark-up size decisions.” Autom. Constr. 17 (7): 864–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.013.
Egemen, M., and A. N. Mohamed. 2007. “A framework for contractors to reach strategically correct bid/no bid and mark-up size decisions.” Build. Environ. 42 (3): 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.016.
El-Mashaleh, M. S. 2010. “Decision to bid or not to bid: A data envelopment analysis approach.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 37 (1): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1139/L09-119.
Friedman, L. 1956. “A competitive-bidding strategy.” Oper. Res. 4 (1): 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.4.1.104.
Gates, M. 1983. “A bidding strategy based on ESPE.” Cost Eng. 25 (6): 27–35.
Harris, F., R. McCaffer, and F. Edum-Fotwe. 2006. Modern construction management. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Jarkas, A. M., S. A. Mubarak, and C. Y. Kadri. 2014. “Critical factors determining bid/no bid decisions of contractors in Qatar.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (4): 05014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000223.
Kerzner, H. 2009. Project management a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
King, M., and A. Mercer. 1987. “Differences in bidding strategies.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28 (1): 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90166-4.
Leśniak, A., and E. Plebankiewicz. 2015. “Modeling the decision-making process concerning participation in construction bidding.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (2): 04014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000237.
Leśniak, A., and A. Radziejowska. 2017. “Supporting bidding decision using multi-criteria analysis methods.” Procedia Eng. 208: 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.023.
Lewis, H. 2003. Bids, tenders and proposals. London: Kogan Page.
Mohanty, R. 1992. “Project selection by a multiple-criteria decision-making method: An example from a developing country.” Int. J. Project Manage. 10 (1): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(92)90070-P.
Mu, E. 2017. Practical decision making: An introduction to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) using super decisions V2. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Oo, B. L., D. S. Drew, and H. P. Lo. 2007. “Applying a random coefficients logistic model to contractors’ decision to bid.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 25 (4): 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600922552.
Park, W. R., and W. B. Chapin. 1992. Construction bidding: Strategic pricing for profit. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Saaty, R. W. 1987. “The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used.” Math. Modell. 9 (3–5): 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytical hierarchical process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. 1991. Prediction, projection, and forecasting: Applications of the analytic hierarchy process in economics, finance, politics, games, and sports. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Saaty, T. L. 2001. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Shash, A. A. 1993. “Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 11 (2): 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199300000004.
Triantaphyllou, E., and S. H. Mann. 1995. “Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: Some challenges.” Int. J. Ind. Eng. Appl. Pract. 2 (1): 35–44.
Wanous, M., H. A. Boussabaine, and J. Lewis. 2003. “A neural network bid/no bid model: The case for contractors in Syria.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 21 (7): 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000093323.
Whittaker, J. 1981. “Implementing a bidding model.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 32 (1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1981.3.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 25Issue 1February 2020

History

Received: May 29, 2019
Accepted: Jul 29, 2019
Published online: Sep 26, 2019
Published in print: Feb 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 26, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Duygu Kalan, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. Email: [email protected]
Mehmet Egemen Ozbek, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-364X [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80253 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-364X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share