Case Studies
Mar 8, 2019

Optimal Depth-to-Span Ratio for Composite Rigid-Frame Bridges

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 24, Issue 2

Abstract

The depth-to-span ratio is not only an important part of steel-concrete composite rigid-frame bridges (CRFBs) but is also one of the important parameters in designing CRFBs, determining the appearance of the bridge, volume of work for the whole bridge, arrangement of the prestressed reinforcements, clearance of the bridge, mechanical performance, and so on. However, there is little research about the effects of depth-to-span ratio with the steel section length on the structural mechanical behavior. This study examined the influence of depth-to-span ratio on the structural behavior of a rigid-frame bridge (e.g., bending moment and stress) and conducted the optimization of the depth-to-span ratio using the bending strain energy as the objective function. Taking a CRFB with a span combination of (84 + 200 + 84 m) as an example, the structural optimization yielded an optimal center-span depth-to-span ratio of 1:32 and support depth-to-span ratio of 1:16, which had the least bending strain energy and acceptable magnitudes of bending moment, bending stress, and structural deformation. The sensitivity study via parametric analysis indicated that the depth-to-span ratio had a significant influence on the mechanical responses of the CRFB, including the bending moment and bending stress at the critical locations. The outcome of this study provides guidance for the structural design of CRFBs regarding the steel section length.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adeli, H., and J. Zhang. 1995. “Fully nonlinear analysis of composite girder cable-stayed bridges.” Comput. Struct. 54 (2): 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)00332-W.
Baldomir, A., and S. Hernández. 2009. “Cable optimization of a long span cable stayed bridge in La Coruña (Spain).” Comput. Aided Optimum Des. Eng. XI 106: 107–119. https://doi.org/10.2495/OP090101.
Chen, D. W., F. T. K. Au, L. G. Tham, and P. K. K. Lee. 2000. “Determination of initial cable forces in prestressed concrete cable-stayed bridges for given design deck profiles using the force equilibrium method'.” Comput. Struct. 74 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00315-0.
Cheng, J. 2010. “Optimum design of steel truss arch bridges using a hybrid genetic algorithm.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 66 (8–9): 1011–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.007.
Everitt, B. 1998. Cambridge dictionary of statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feng, P.-C., Y.-Y. Wu, Y.-Q. Yang, and C.-Y. Li. 2006. “Analysis of accident of bursting crack in bottom slab of a continuous rigid-frame bridge.” World Bridges 1: 66–69.
Frangopol, D. M. 1985. “Structural optimization using reliability concepts'.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (11): 2288–2301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:11(2288).
Furukawa, K., H. Sugimoto, T. Egusa, K. Inoue, and Y. Yamada. 1987. “Studies on optimization of cable prestressing for cable-stayed bridges.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Cable-stayed Bridges, 723–734. Bangkok, Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology.
Furukawa, K., H. Sugimoto, K. Inoue, and Y. Yamada. 1989. “Optimization of cable prestresses of cable stayed bridges based on minimum strain energy criterion.” In Proc., Computer Utilization in Structural Engineering. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hassan, M. M. 2013. “Optimization of stay cables in cable-stayed bridges using finite element, genetic algorithm, and B-spline combined technique.” Eng. Struct. 49: 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.036.
Jurado, J. A., and S. Hernández. 2004. “Sensitivity analysis of bridge flutter with respect to mechanical parameters of the deck.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 27 (4): 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0374-8.
Jurado, J. Á., F. Nieto, S. Hernández, and A. Mosquera. 2008. “Efficient cable arrangement in cable stayed bridges based on sensitivity analysis of aeroelastic behaviour.” Adv. Eng. Software 39 (9): 757–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.10.004.
Kaveh, A., B. Hassani, S. Shojaee, and S. M. Tavakkoli. 2008. “Structural topology optimization using ant colony methodology.” Eng. Struct. 30 (9): 2559–2565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.02.012.
Kwak, H.-G., and Y.-J. Seo. 2000. “Long-term behavior of composite girder bridges.” Comput. Struct. 74 (5): 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00064-4.
Lee, T.-Y., Y.-H. Kim, and S.-W. Kang. 2008. “Optimization of tensioning strategy for asymmetric cable-stayed bridge and its effect on construction process.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 35 (6): 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0172-9.
Lin, K.-Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 1996. “Reliability-based optimum design of reinforced concrete girders.” Struct. Saf. 18 (2–3): 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(96)00013-6.
Lute, V., A. Upadhyay, and K. K. Singh. 2009. “Computationally efficient analysis of cable-stayed bridge for GA-based optimization.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22 (4–5): 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2009.04.001.
Martí, J. V., F. Gonzalez-Vidosa, V. Yepes, and J. Alcalá. 2013. “Design of prestressed concrete precast road bridges with hybrid simulated annealing.” Eng. Struct. 48: 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.014.
Martínez, F. J., F. González-Vidosa, A. Hospitaler, and J. Alcalá. 2011. “Design of tall bridge piers by ant colony optimization.” Eng. Struct. 33 (8): 2320–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.005.
Martins, A. M. B., L. M. C. Simões, and J. H. J. O. Negrão. 2015. “Optimization of cable forces on concrete cable-stayed bridges including geometrical nonlinearities.” Comput. Struct. 155: 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.032.
Mei, G. 1999. “Stability analysis of the continuous rigid frame bridge with high pier and large span.” J. Xi’an Highway Univ. 1999-03: 3–7.
Mosquera, A, S. Hernández, and J. Á. Jurado. 2003. “Analytical sensitivity analysis of aeroelastic performance of suspension bridges under construction.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering, 1555–1562. Lubbock, TX: Wind Science and Engineering Research Center at Texas Tech Univ.
Negrão, J. H. O., and L. M. C. Simões. 1997. “Optimization of cable-stayed bridges with three-dimensional modelling.” Comput. Struct. 64 (1–4): 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00166-6.
Nieto, F., S. Hernandez, and J. Á. Jurado. 2006. “Distributed computing for design optimization of the messina bridge considering aeroelastic constraints.” J. Wind Eng. 108: 757–760.
Sung, Y.-C., D.-W. Chang, and E.-H. Teo. 2006. “Optimum post-tensioning cable forces of Mau-Lo Hsi cable-stayed bridge.” Eng. Struct. 28 (10): 1407–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.009.
Wilde, D. J. 1978. Globally optimal design. New York: Wiley.
Xiang, Y.-Q., Y.-D. Yao, F.-Q. Hu, L.-J. Jing, and W.-G. Zhu. 2004. “Study of static and dynamic behavior of T-shape rigid frame bridge reinforced by prestressed external tendon.” China J. Highway Transp. 2004-01: 1–9.
Xue, X. W., H. Yuan, and S. Q. Li. 2012. “Study on optimizing design of structural rigidity of super-large span continuous rigid frame bridge using ANSYS.” Adv. Mater. Res. 446–449: 1243–1247. https://doi.org/10.4028/scientific5/AMR.446-449.1243.
Yang, Y. X. 2012. “Analysis of stress measuring and testing of continuous rigid frame bridge.” Adv. Mater. Res. 346: 787–792. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.346.787.
Yang, Y. X., and L. Sun. 2011. “Spatial analysis of continuous rigid frame high pier under completed bridge state.” Adv. Mater. Res. 280: 183–185. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.280.183.
Zhang, W. H., Y. T. Zhang, and G. Q. Li. 2011. “Evolutionary structural topology optimization for cantilever construction of continuous rigid-frame bridge.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 90–93: 18–22. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.90-93.18.
Zhang, Y. B., and D. P. Liu. 2011. “Research on setting of pre-camber of long-span continuous rigid frame bridge with high piers.” Adv. Mater. Res. 255–260: 821–825. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.821.
Zong, Z., L. Canglin, L. Youqin, and R. Weixin. 2004. “Analysis of dynamic characteristics of a large-span prestressed concrete continuous rigid frame bridge.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. Chin. Ed. 24: 98–104.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 24Issue 2May 2019

History

Received: Jul 18, 2018
Accepted: Dec 14, 2018
Published online: Mar 8, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 8, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Construction Management and Engineering, North Dakota State Univ., 1315 Centennial Blvd., Fargo, ND 58108 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-4364. Email: [email protected]
Huojun Yang
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Management and Engineering, North Dakota State Univ., 1315 Centennial Blvd., Fargo, ND 58108.
Zhijun Zuo
Engineer, Taiyuan Design Institute, China Railway Engineering Consulting Group Co., Ltd., 262 Jianshe Rd., Taiyuan, Shanxi 030013, China.
Zhili Gao, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7623-9638
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Construction Management and Engineering, North Dakota State Univ., 1315 Centennial Blvd., Fargo, ND 58108. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7623-9638.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share