Technical Papers
Jan 30, 2018

Hazards and Risk in Construction and the Impact of Incentives and Rewards on Safety Outcomes

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 23, Issue 2

Abstract

Workplace hazards, when combined with demanding task, organizational factors, work environments, personal factors, and external factors can produce unacceptable safety risks to field personnel and may lead to severe workplace injuries. Workplace accidents are undesirable; they can cause physical and psychological harm to workers, their families, and the entire community at work. Along with this potential harm, workplace accidents are associated with potential negative economic and noneconomic impacts on quality of work, worker productivity, work schedule, project cost, stakeholder relations, and corporate reputation. To effectively mitigate and control workplace safety risk, a comprehensive risk-mitigation plan should be developed and implemented before workers are exposed to risk. To develop and implement an effective risk mitigation plan, the difference between hazard and risk and the transformation process that a hazard undergoes when combined with other workplace conditions before emerging as a workplace safety risk must be fully comprehended. To facilitate this comprehension, this paper describes the differences between a hazard and safety risk and provides an explanation of the potential impact of internal, external, and project- and organizational-related, factors on the magnitude of the exposed safety risk. Hazard is not synonymous with risk, although hazard severity is a major determinant of the magnitude of exposed safety risk and the safety outcome of an operation primarily relies on the level of worker exposure to the hazard. Similarly, incentives are not tantamount to rewards even though rewards are the end result of incentives. Incentives are motivations associated with future rewards, either extrinsic or intrinsic, that are contingent upon the fulfillment of future conditions determined ahead of time before the start of work operations. The paper is expected to: (1) benefit field practitioners by helping them to increase their understanding of the transformation of a hazard into acceptable or unacceptable safety risk; and (2) provide a summary of the different types of behavioral approaches (e.g., safety incentive programs) that employers can implement to enhance workplace safety and work quality.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Al-Bahar, J. F., and Crandall, K. C. (1990). “Systematic risk management approach for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 533–546.
Albert, A., Hallowell, M., and Kleiner, B. (2014). “Enhancing construction hazard recognition and communication with energy-based cognitive mnemonics and safety meeting maturity model: Multiple baseline study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013042.
Banik, G. (2002). “Criteria for construction safety incentive programs—A perspective.” Am. Prof. Constructor, 26(1), 33–40.
Baradan, S., and Usmen, M. A. (2006). “Comparative injury and fatality risk analysis of building trades.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 533–539.
Behm, M., Lingard, H., and Bruening, J. (2014). “Validity and reliability of dependent variables: Considerations for construction safety researchers.” Proc., CIB W099 International Conf. on Achieving Sustainable Construction Health and Safety, Lund Univ., Lund, Sweden, 577–585.
BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). (2016). “National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2015: Preliminary results.” U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC.
CBC News. (2012). “2nd death confirmed at Fortis construction site.” 〈www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/2nd-death-confirmed-at-fortis-construction-site-1.1179765〉 (Jul. 1, 2017).
Choe, S., and Leite, F. (2016). “Assessing safety risk among different construction trades: Quantitative approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04016133.
Deci, E., and Ryan, R. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Fleming, M. (2009). “Hazard recognition.” ByDesign, 8(3), 1–15.
Fleming, M., and Fischer, B. (2017). “Hazard recognition: Bridging knowledge & competency for process & occupational safety.” Professional Safety, 62(6), 52–61.
Gambatese, J. (2014). “Safety incentives.” Construction safety management and engineering, 2nd Ed., D. C. Hill, Chapter 8, American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), Des Plaines, IL, 138–157.
Gambatese, J. A., Pestana, C., and Lee, H. W. (2016). “Alignment between lean principles and practices and worker safety behavior.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04016083.
Gowen, L., and Collofello, J. (1994). “Software safety and preliminary hazard analysis.” Prof. Saf., 39(11), 20–25.
Hinze, J. (2006). Construction safety, 2nd Ed., Gainesville, FL.
LaBelle, J. E. (2005). “The paradox of safety hopes and rewards: Are you rewarding the right behavior?” Prof. Saf, 50(12), 37–42.
Love, P. E. D., Teo, P., Morrison, J., and Grove, M. (2016). “Quality and safety in construction: Creating a no-harm environment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 05016006.
Luthans, F. (1988). Organisational behaviour, 8th Ed., McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Lyon, B. K. (2016). “Fundamental techniques.” Risk assessment: A practical guide to assessing operational risks, G. Popov, B. K. Lyon, and B. Hollcroft, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 91–119.
Manuele, F. (2003). On the practice of safety, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Manuele, F. (2005). “Risk assessment & hierarchies of control.” Prof. Saf., 50(5), 33–39.
Manuele, F. (2008). “Prevention through design addressing occupational risks in the design and redesign processes.” Prof. Saf, 53(10), 31–40.
Manuele, F. (2010). “Acceptable risk: Time for SH&E professionals to adopt the concept.” Prof. Saf, 55(5), 30–38.
Manuele, F. (2011). “Reviewing Heinrich: Dislodging two myths from the practice of safety.” Prof. Saf, 56(10), 52–61.
Merriam Webster’s Dictionary (2016). “Risk.” 〈https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/risk〉 (Dec. 17, 2016).
Maslow, A. H. (1943). “A theory of human motivation.” Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
Modarres, M. (2006). Risk analysis in engineering: Techniques, tools, and trends. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Rajendran, S., Clarke, B., and Andrews, R. (2012). “Quality management in construction: An expanding role for SH&E professionals.” Prof. Saf., 57(11), 37–42.
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions.” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 25(1), 54–67.
USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council). (2014). “Good to know: Green building incentive strategies.” 〈http://www.usgbc.org/articles/good-know-green-building-incentive-strategies-0〉 (Dec. 12, 2016).
West, B. (2016). “Sorting it out: What is the difference between hazard and risk.” 〈https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sorting-out-what-difference-between-hazard-risk-bryan-west〉 (Dec. 17, 2016).
Wilde, G. J. (1982). “The theory of risk homeostasis: Implications for safety and health.” Risk Anal., 2(4), 209–225.
Wilde, G. J. (1998). “Risk homeostasis theory: An overview.” Inj. Prev., 4(2), 89–91.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 23Issue 2May 2018

History

Received: Jul 24, 2017
Accepted: Oct 2, 2017
Published online: Jan 30, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jun 30, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ali Karakhan, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Faculty Member, Engineering Affairs Dept., Univ. of Baghdad, Iraq 10071; Ph.D. Student, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 208 Owen Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
John Gambatese, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share