Abstract
Bridge design spectra in the current design specifications are geometric mean based. In other words, the underlying research on which ground motion data are based predicts the geometric mean spectral acceleration of two horizontal components. This is, perhaps, transparent to many engineers performing bridge design in regions subject to extreme seismic loading. For response spectrum analyses, this does prove problematic when estimating structural response to bidirectional ground motions. Prevailing combination rules rely on the assumption that, when one component produces the maximum structural response, the second component produces 30% of the corresponding maximum. The purpose of this paper is to assess the validity of this prevalent rule for sites characterized by large magnitude earthquakes (MW = ±7.7) and Site Class D/E subsurface conditions. This study further provides estimates of maximum-to-geometric mean displacement ratios for various levels of ductility and provides estimates of dispersion for inelastic displacements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2011). Guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design, 2nd Ed., Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2014). Guide specifications for seismic isolation design, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Bradley, B. A., and Baker, J. W. (2015). “Ground motion directionality in the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(3), 371–384.
FEMA. (2009). “NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures: Training and instructional materials.” FEMA P-750, Washington, DC.
Hashash, Y. M. A., Tsai, C. C., Phillips, C., and Park, D. (2008). “Soil-column depth-dependent seismic site coefficients and hazard maps for the upper Mississippi embayment.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98(4), 2004–2021.
Huff, T. (2015a). “Partial isolation as a design alternative for pile bent bridges in the New Madrid seismic zone.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 04015018.
Huff, T. (2015b). “Seismic displacement estimates for bridges in the New Madrid seismic zone.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 04015016.
Huff, T. (2016). “Issues in the prediction of inelastic behavior in bridges during earthquakes.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 04016007.
Huff, T., and Pezeshk, S. (2015). “Inelastic displacement spectra for bridges using the substitute structure method.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 04015020.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). (2014). “PEER ground motion database.” ⟨http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/⟩ (Aug. 3, 2016).
Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., and Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
Ryan, K. L., and Chopra, A. K. (2004). “Estimation of seismic demands on isolators based on nonlinear analysis.” J. Struct. Eng., 392–402.
SeismoSpect 1.3.0 [Computer software]. SeismoSoft, Pavia, Italy.
Stewart, J. P., et al. (2011). “Representation of bidirectional ground motions for design spectra in building codes.” Earthquake Spectra, 27(3), 927–937.
Wang, D. S., Li, H. N., Wang, G. X., and Fan, Y. F. (2008). “Inelastic response spectra for bidirectional ground motions.” Proc., 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Beijing.
Warn, G. P., and Whittaker, A. S. (2007). “Performance estimates for seismically isolated bridges.” MCEER-07-0024, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 7, 2016
Accepted: Jul 12, 2016
Published online: Aug 25, 2016
Discussion open until: Jan 25, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.