Case Studies
Jun 21, 2013

Design Management in Design-Build Megaprojects: SR 99 Bored Tunnel Case Study

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 19, Issue 1

Abstract

The increasing use of the design-build project delivery method has resulted in it now being one of the most popular nontraditional methods for delivering road, bridge, mass transit, and rail projects in the United States. However, although the use of design-build is widespread, there remains a substantial lack of information about how to effectively plan and implement design management procedures for design-build transportation projects. In particular, transportation agencies lack information about how to shape appropriate design management roles for various contractual parties and to manage design activities for design-build megaprojects. To fill this gap, this paper presents a case study of the SR 99 Bored Tunnel project in Seattle, Washington. It provides detailed information on how the owner, the Washington State DOT (WSDOT), incorporated design management procedures into its requirements and how the design-builder, Seattle Tunnel Partners, implemented them within its project management processes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bogus, S., Migliaccio, G. C., and Yin, R. (2013). “Study of the relationship between procurement duration and project performance in design-build projects: Comparison between water/wastewater and transportation sectors.” J. Manage. Eng., 382–391.
Chan, A. P., Scott, D., and Lam, E. W. M. (2002). “Framework of success criteria for design/build projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 120–128.
Chan, E. H. W., Chan, A. P. C., and Yu, A. T. W. (2005). “Design management in design and build projects: The new role of the contractor.” Construction Research Congress 2005, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–11.
Design-Build Institute of America. (2012). “State legislation.” 〈http://www.dbia.org/advocacy/state/〉 (Jan. 12, 2012).
El Wardani, M. A., Messner, J. I., and Horman, M. J. (2006). “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 230–238.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2002). “Design-build contracting; 23 CFR parts 627, 635, 636, 637 and 710.” Fed. Regist., 67(237), 75902–75935.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2007). “Design-build contracting; 23 CFR parts 630, 635, and 636.” Fed. Regist., 72(156), 45329–45338.
Gransberg, D. D., Datin, J., and Molenaar, K. (2008). “Quality assurance in design-build projects.” Publication NCHRP Synthesis 376, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Gransberg, D. D., and Senadheera, S. (1999). “Design-build contract award methods for transportation Projects.” J. Transp. Eng., 565–567.
Gransberg, D. D., and Windel, E. (2008). “Communicating design quality requirements for public sector design/build projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 105–110.
Hale, D. R., Gibson, G. E., Migliaccio, G. C., and Shrestha, P. P. (2009). “An empirical comparison of design-build and design-bid-build project delivery methods for building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 579–587.
Hemphill, G. B. (2012). Practical tunnel construction, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Ibbs, C. W., Kwak, Y. H., Ng, T., and Odabasi, A. M. (2003). “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 382–387.
Kramer, S. L., and Eberhard, M. O. (1995). Seismic vulnerability of the Alaskan Way Viaduct: Summary report, Washington State DOT (WSDOT), Seattle.
Maidl, B., Schmid, L., Ritz, W., Herrenknecht, M., and Sturge, D. (1996). Hardrock tunnel boring machines, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Germany.
Migliaccio, G. C., Bogus, S., and Chen, A. (2010). “Relationship between durations of design-build procurement activities and performance of transportation projects.” Transportation Research Record 2151, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 67–73.
Scott, S., Molenaar, K. R., Gransberg, D. D., and Smith, N. C. (2006). “Best-value procurement methods for highway construction projects.” Publication NCHRP Rep. No. 561, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Seattle Tunnel Partners (STP). (2012). Design quality management plan, Seattle.
Shrestha, P. P., Migliaccio, G. C., O’Connor, J. T., and Gibson, G. E. (2007). “Benchmarking of large design-build highway projects: One-to-one comparison and comparison with DBB projects.” Transportation Research Record: J. Transportation Research Board, 1994/2007, 17–25,
Shrestha, P. P., O’Connor, J. T., and Gibson, G. E. (2012). “Performance comparison of large design-build and design-bid-build highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1–13.
Steakley, L. (2004). “Seattle plans to replace viaduct with $4-billion tunnel.” Engineering News-Record, 253(23), 12.
Washington State DOT (WSDOT). (2009). Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement project history report, Seattle.
Washington State DOT (WSDOT). (2010). Instructions to Proposers; SR 99 bored tunnel alternative, Seattle.
Washington State DOT (WSDOT). (2012). Design-build contract, SR 99 bored tunnel alternative, Seattle.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 19Issue 1February 2014
Pages: 148 - 158

History

Received: Dec 12, 2012
Accepted: Jun 20, 2013
Published online: Jun 21, 2013
Published in print: Feb 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Umberto C. Gatti [email protected]
Research Associate, Univ. of Washington, Dept. of Construction Management, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail: [email protected]
Giovanni C. Migliaccio [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Univ. of Washington, Dept. of Construction Management, Seattle, WA 98195 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Linea Laird, M.ASCE [email protected]
Washington State DOT Administrator, Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Program, 999 Third Ave., Suite 2200, Seattle, WA 98104. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share