Benchmarking Construction Labor Productivity
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 20, Issue 4
Abstract
There appears to be confusion regarding how to conduct a comprehensive benchmarking study, especially one on labor productivity. This paper details a six-step procedure for conducting a labor productivity benchmarking study. The procedure addresses the questions of how, who, and why. The procedure is illustrated using three case study projects. A labor productivity study has several unique features. First, the objective must be precisely defined. A study of labor productivity can be done for many reasons, and the purpose must be clearly defined because the objective influences subsequent decisions involving protocols. Procedures for how the study will be conducted to assure valid comparisons must be developed. Next, the key performance indicators (KPIs) must be determined and a procedure must be established for evaluating multiple KPIs. Labor productivity is unique in that there is no single KPI that can be used to define best performance. Multiple KPIs are proposed and procedures are developed. Once a procedure is developed for evaluating multiple KPIs, data are collected and the best performer is identified. The last question is, “why is a project/activity/entity the best?” This question is often ignored in most so-called benchmarking studies. Once the best project/activity/entity is identified, principles can be summarized as a prescription for productivity improvement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Anson, M., and Wang, S. Q. (1998). “Performance of concrete placing in Hong Kong buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116–124.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (1998). “Shielding production: Essential step in production control.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 11–17.
BOMEL Consulting Engineers (BCE). (1998). Benchmarking the productivity of the UK construction industry, London.
Construction Industry Board (CIB). (1992). Towards a 30% productivity improvement in construction, London.
E&FN Spon. (1986). Spon’s construction cost handbook, London.
Garnett, N., and Pickrell, S. (2000). “Benchmarking for construction: Theory and practice.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18(1), 55–63.
Graves, A., and Madigan, D. (1997). “The experience of benchmarking in automotive and aerospace industries.” Proc., Int. Meeting of the Armathwaite Initiative on Global Construction IT Futures, P. S. Brandon and M. Betts, eds., Construct IT Centre of Excellence, Salford, U.K.
Hanna, A. S., Russell, J. S., Gotzion, T. W., and Nordheim, E. V. (1999a). “Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for mechanical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 176–184.
Hanna, A. S., Russell, J. S., Nordheim, E. V., and Bruggink, M. J. (1999b). “Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for electrical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 224–232.
Horman, M. J., and Thomas, H. R. (2005). “Role of inventory buffers in construction labor performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 834–843.
Madigan, D., and Print, M. (1997). “Benchmarking in civil engineering.” Rep. ACI/CNU/97/038, School of Management, Univ. of Bath, Bath, U.K.
Thomas, H. R. (2000). “Schedule acceleration, work flow, and labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 261–267.
Thomas, H. R. (2003). “Principles of labor productivity measurement and processing.” PTI Rep. 0323, Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA.
Thomas, H. R., and Ellis, R. D., Jr. (2007). “Contractor prebid planning principles.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 542–552.
Thomas, H. R., and Ellis, R. D., Jr. (2009). “Fundamental principles of weather mitigation.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 29–35.
Thomas, H. R., and Flynn, C. J. (2011). “Fundamental principles of subcontractor management.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 106–111.
Thomas, H. R., and Horman, M. J. (2006). “Fundamental principles of workforce management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 97–104.
Thomas, H. R., Horman, M. J., de Souza, U. E. L., and Završki, I. (2002). Benchmarking of labor-intensive construction activities: Lean construction and fundamental principles of workforce management, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Thomas, H. R., Horner, M. W., Završki, I., and De Souza, U. E. L. (2000). “Procedures manual for collecting productivity and related data of labor-intensive activities on commercial construction projects: Concrete formwork, steel reinforcement, concrete placement, masonry, and structural steel.” PTI Rep. 2K27, Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA.
Thomas, H. R., and Napolitan, C. L. (1995). “Quantitative effects of construction changes on labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 290–296.
Thomas, H. R., and Raynar, K. A. (1997). “Scheduled overtime and labor productivity: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 181–188.
Thomas, H. R., Riley, D. R., and Messner, J. I. (2005). “Fundamental principles of site material management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 808–815.
Thomas, H. R., Riley, D. R., and Sinha, S. K. (2006). “Fundamental principles for avoiding congested work areas—A case study.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 197–205.
Thomas, H. R., and Završki, I. (1999a). “Construction baseline productivity: Theory and practice.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 295–303.
Thomas, H. R., and Završki, I. (1999b). “Theoretical model for international benchmarking of labor productivity.” Rep. W-65, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Winch, G., and Carr, B. (2001). “Benchmarking on-site productivity in France and the UK: A CALIBRE approach.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19(6), 578–590.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 20 • Issue 4 • November 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 30, 2011
Accepted: Jun 5, 2012
Published online: Jul 14, 2012
Published in print: Nov 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.