Study of the Capability of Multiple Mechanical Fasteners in Roof-to-Wall Connections of Timber Residential Buildings
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 1
Abstract
One of the most critical connections in wood frame construction is that of the roof rafter and the top plate of the wall. This type of connection typically uses mechanical fasteners, such as metal straps or clips fastened with nails. Manufacturers base the allowable capacity of connections with one fastener on results of tests performed on such connections. However, it is assumed in current design practice that the capacity of a connection with two mechanical fasteners is twice the capacity of a connection with a single fastener. Implicit in this practice is the assumption that the connection’s capacity is proportional to the number of fasteners per connection joint. This approach, based as it is on testing a single fastener per joint, disregards the fact that the failure modes of a connection joint may depend on the number of fasteners per joint. This paper presents results of tests that establish this fact. The results, based on testing with three types of wood (spruce pine fir, southern yellow pine, and douglas fir), are used to modify the current design approach and propose a realistic relationship between the capacity of the connection joint and the number of fasteners in the joint. The results show that current design practices may overestimate the capacity of these joints and can therefore be the cause of roof-to-wall connection failures in extreme wind events. The research reported herein is limited to the case of unidirectional loading. Future research is planned on the case of multidirectional loading.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF Award No. NSF0727871). The findings and opinions presented in this paper are those of the writers and do not reflect the views of the sponsoring agency.
References
American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA). (2005). “National design specification for wood construction.” ANSI/AF&PA NDS-2005, Washington, D.C.
ASTM. (2006). “Standard test methods for mechanical fasteners in wood.” ASTM D1761, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2005). “Summary report on building performance: 2004 hurricane season.” Rep. No. 490, Washington, D.C.
Florida Building Code (FBC). (2007). Building, Wood, Tallahassee, Fla.
Goldenberg, S. B., Landsea, C. W., Mestas-Nunez, A. M., and Gray, W. M. (2001). “The recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity: causes and implications.” Science, 293, 474–479.
Holmes, J. D. (2007). Wind loading of structures, Taylor and Francis, London.
Li, Y. (2005). “Fragility methodology for performance-based engineering of wood-frame residential construction.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Lott, N., and Ross, T. (2006). “Tracking and evaluating U.S. billion dollar weather disasters, 1980–2005.” Forum on environmental risk and impacts on society: Successes and challenges, ⟨http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/100686.pdf⟩.
Mani, S. (1997). “Influence functions for evaluating design loads on roof-truss to wall connections in low-rise buildings.” M.S. thesis, Clemson Univ., Clemson, S.C.
National Academy of Sciences. (1999). Meeting research and education needs in coastal engineering, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1–62.
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) Research Center. (2002). “Roof framing connections in conventional residential construction.” Rep. No. H-21172CA, Washington, D.C., 1–48.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2006). “Performance of physical structures in Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita: A reconnaissance report.” NIST Technical Rep. No. 1476, Gaithersburg, Md.
National Science Board (NSB). (2007). “Hurricane warning: The critical need for a national hurricane research initiative.” Rep. No. NSB-06-115, Arlington, Va., 1–36.
Notice of Acceptance (NOA). (2004). NOA No. 04-0510.03, Miami-Dade County, Product Control Div., Building Code Compliance Office, Miami, Fla.
Reed, T. D., Rosowsky, D. V., and Schiff, S. D. (1996). “Uplift capacity of rafter-to-top-plate connections in light-frame construction.” Blue Sky Project Rep., Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, S.C.
Reed, T. D., Rosowsky, D. V., and Schiff, S. D. (1997). “Uplift capacity of light-frame rafter to top plate connections.” J. Archit. Eng., 3(4), 156–163.
Riley, M. A., and Sadek, F. (2003). “Experimental testing of roof to wall connections in wood frame houses.” Technical Rep. NISTIR 6938, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Rosowsky, D. V., Reed, T. D., and Tyner, K. G. (1998). “Establishing uplift design values for metal connectors in light-frame construction.” J. Test. Eval., 26(5), 426–433.
Simpson Strong Tie. (2009). Wood construction connectors, Simpson Strong Tie, Pleasanton, Calif., C-2009.
Yancey, C. W., Cheok, G. S., Sadek, F., and Mohraz, B. (1998). “A summary of the structural performance of single-family, wood-frame housing.” Technical Rep. NISTIR 6224, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 16 • Issue 1 • February 2011
Pages: 2 - 9
Copyright
© 2011 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 27, 2009
Accepted: Feb 5, 2010
Published online: Feb 13, 2010
Published in print: Feb 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.