Distribution Factors for Short-Haul Vehicular Loads on Prestressed Concrete Open Box Beam (U-Beam) Bridges
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 2
Abstract
The design and analysis of a bridge system is a complicated task. In order to simplify the design process, it is necessary to break the system into smaller, less complex, and more manageable subsystems. The AASHTO load-and-resistance factor design (LRFD) bridge design specifications provide the design methods and procedures to design the bridge components explicitly and on an individual basis. In particular, the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications employs the beam-line method or distribution factor method to reduce the spatial dimensionality of bridge structures into line elements. The distribution factor is used to modify the load effects determined from the beam-line analysis to account for the effects at other locations in the structure. The published vehicular design loads adopted by the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications are considered to be an “average design truck.” The average design truck loads exclude vehicles that are above the legal weight limits for the United States, but are regularly allowed to operate on the U.S. highway systems. These loads are short-haul vehicles such as solid waste trucks, aerial rescue fire trucks and concrete mixers. The most common type of bridge in the United States is the slab-girder bridge system. The principal function of the slab-girder bridge is to provide a roadway surface and transmit the applied loads of the roadway to the girder system supporting the roadway. This research examines the loading effects of the short-haul vehicular loads on a typical prestressed concrete open box beam (U-beam) bridge. This study consists of analytically determining the distribution factors of special vehicles such as, a concrete mixer, a solid waste truck, and an aerial fire rescue truck, and comparing the results to distribution factors recommended in the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2004). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 3rd Ed., AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Aswad, G. (1994). “Comparison of refined and simplified analysis methods for PS concrete I-beam bridge decks.” MS thesis, Univ. of Colorado at Denver, Denver.
Barker, R. M., and Puckett, J. A. (1997). Design of highway bridges, Wiley, New York.
Chen, Y., and Aswad, A. (1996). “Stretching span capability pf PS concrete bridges under AASHTO-LRFD.” J. Bridge Eng., 1(3), 112–120.
Texas Department of Transportation. (2001). Bridge design manual, Texas DOT, Austin, Tex.
Zellin, M. A., Kostem, C. N., VanHorn, D. A., and Kulicki, J. M. (1976). “Live load distribution factors for prestressed concrete I-beam bridges.” Fritz Engineering Laboratory Rep. No. 387.2B, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, Pa.
Zokaie, T. (2000). “AASHTO-LRFD live load distribution specifications.” J. Bridge Eng., 5(2), 131–138.
Zokaie, T., Osterkamp, T. A., and Imbsen, R. A. (1991). “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.” NCHRP Project Rep. No. 12-26, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 11, 2009
Accepted: Jun 10, 2009
Published online: Jun 13, 2009
Published in print: May 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.