Technical Papers
Aug 26, 2022

Economics of Inspection and Condition Assessment of High-Consequence Water Pipeline and Assessing Its Remaining Life: Theoretical Framework

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper describes an approach enabling well-supported, rational decisions about when to deploy inspection and condition assessment for high-consequence water pipelines, which techniques and technologies to select, and when to stop assessing pipeline condition and plan for replacement. The proposed probabilistic approach considers the entire life-cycle cost of the pipeline, accounting for deterioration rate, failure consequences, cost of rehabilitation, accuracy and cost of inspection/condition assessment, cost of emergency repair versus planned intervention, and cost of total pipeline replacement. The approach allows combining expert opinion (semi-informative assessment) with hard field data (historical failures, and inspection and condition assessment results) into a robust, well-informed, and reproducible assessment of pipeline deterioration rate. The approach also allows pipeline owners to incorporate new field data, which in turns permits continually updating the assessment of the pipeline condition. The approach also estimates the remaining life of the pipeline, in anticipation of its complete replacement. End-of-life is defined as the time at which it is no longer economical to continue repair or rehabilitation, and full replacement is economically preferable.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Water Research Foundation (WRF), with in-kind support from the authors, as well as water utilities and inspection technology providers from Canada, the US, Europe, and Australia. The authors are indebted to the project WRF advisory committee members, namely John Kennedy (Tampa Bay), Jeff Leighton (Portland), and Joe Thurwanger (Aqua America). Technical Advisory Board members Chris Macey (AECOM, Winnipeg), Nathan Farber (San Diego), David Marshall (Tarrant), and Roy Brander (Vancouver) also provided valuable input. Rob Raucher (Corona Environmental Consulting) shared data of water failures that he and his team collected on another WRF project. Help from Jian Zhang who served as WRF project manager also is acknowledged.

References

Barnes, Z. A., M. Caudwell, P. R. Chadwick, N. Clarke, A. Grove, A. I. J. Heather, S. Mellot, and P. D. Selbey. 2008. Tool for risk management of water utility assets. Water research foundation report. Denver: Water Research Foundation.
Beuken, R. H. S., H. de Kater, and G. A. M. Mesman. 2010. “The application of in-line inspection technology for condition assessment of water mains.” In 12th Annual Conf. Water Distribution System Analysis 2010. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Burn, L. S., S. N. Tucker, M. Rahilly, P. Davis, R. Jarrett, and M. Po. 2003. “Asset planning for water reticulation systems—The PARMS model.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 3 (1–2): 55–62. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2003.0086.
Conroy, J. E., R. B. Kulkarni, and T. M. Steinbaur. 1994. “The pipeline inspection and maintenance optimization system.” In Distribution pipe: Repair and replacement decision manual: A Technical report. Washington, DC: American Gas Association Operating Section.
Cook, D., B. McAndrew, and G. Shuker. 2009. Large diameter trunk main failures.. Denver: UK Water Industry Research and Water Research Foundation.
Cromwell, J., G. Nestel, R. Albani, L. Paralez, A. Deb, and F. Grabultz. 2001. Financial and economic optimization of water main replacement programs. Denver: American Water Works Association Research Foundation.
Cromwell, J. E., H. Reynolds, N. Pearson, and M. Grant. 2003. Costs of infrastructure failure. Rep. No. 2607. Denver: American Water Works Association.
Davis, P., E. Sullivan, D. Marlow, and D. Marney. 2013. “A selection framework for infrastructure condition monitoring technologies in water and wastewater networks.” J. Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (6): 1947–1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.004.
Deb, A., Y. J. Hasit, H. M. Schoser, G. V. Loganathan, and P. Khambhammettu. 2002. Decision support system for distribution system piping renewal. Denver: AWWA Research Foundation.
Dingus, M., J. Haven, and R. Austin. 2002. Nondestructive, noninvasive assessment of underground pipelines. Denver: AWWA Research Foundation.
FCM (Federation of Canadian Municipalities) and NRC (National Research Council Canada). 2003. “Selection of technologies for the rehabilitation or replacement of sections of a water distribution system.” In InfraGuide: National guide to sustainable municipal infrastructure. Ottawa: FCM and NRC.
Gaewski, P., and F. Blaha. 2007. Analysis of total cost of large-diameter pipe failures. Denver: Water Research Foundation.
Hong, P. H. 1997. “Reliability based optimal inspection and maintenance for pipeline under corrosion.” Civ. Eng. Syst. 14: 313–334.
Hong, P. H. 1999. “Inspection and maintenance planning of pipeline under external corrosion considering generation of new defects.” In Vol. 21 of Structural safety, 203–222. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kleiner, Y., and A. Colombo. 2014. Condition assessment of large diameter iron pipes.. Denver: Water Research Foundation.
Kleiner, Y., B. Rajani, and R. Sadiq. 2005. Risk management of large diameter water transmission mains. Denver: Water Research Foundation and American Water Works Association.
Kulkarni, R., J. Conroy, T. Willke, D. Werner, and W. Krauss. 1992. “Inspection and maintenance priorities for gas transmission pipelines.” In Proc., Int. Gas Research Conf. Chicago: Gas Research Institute.
Liu, Z., Y. Kleiner, B. Rajani, L. Wang, and W. Condit. 2012. Condition assessment of water transmission and distribution systems. Rep. No. EP-C-05-057. Cincinnati: EPA.
Marlow, D., P. Davis, D. Trans, D. Beale, S. Burn, and A. Urquhart. 2009. Remaining asset life: A state of the art review. Alexandria, VA: International Water Association.
Marlow, D., S. Heart, S. Burn, A. Urqhart, S. Gould, M. Anderson, S. Cook, M. Ambrose, B. Madin, and A. Fitzgerald. 2007. Condition assessment strategies and protocols for water and wastewater utility assets. Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Research Foundation, Water Research Foundation, and International Water association.
O’Day, D. K., R. Weiss, S. Chiavari, and D. Blair. 1986. Water main evaluation for rehabilitation/replacement. Denver: AWWA Research Foundation.
Osman, H., K. Bainbridge, M. Gibbons, C. Macey, and R. Homeniuk. 2008. “An integrated management approach for critical water mains.” In Proc., ASCE Int. Pipelines Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Pietig, S. 2015. “The condition assessment of a 30-inch ductile iron water line by WaterOne of Johnson County, Kansas.” In Proc., ASCE Conf. Pipelines 2015, 23–26. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rajani, B., and Y. Kleiner. 2017. Selecting cost-effective condition assessment technologies for high-consequence water mains.. Denver: Water Research Foundation.
Rolfe-Dickinson, S., A. Davies-Jordan, G. Cleveland, P. Halai, and G. Lehman. 2014. Non-destructive condition assessment for small diameter cast and ductile iron pipe. Denver: Water Research Foundation.
Rose, D., R. Green, J. North, and L. Blankenship. 2009. Benefit cost analysis tool, Water Research Foundation report. Denver: Water Research Foundation.
Royer, M. D. 2005. White paper on improvement of structural integrity monitoring for drinking water mains. Edison, NJ: National Risk Management Research Laboratory.
Tischuk, J. L. 2002. “Economics of risk based inspection systems in offshore oil and gas production.” In Proc., Conferencia sobre Tecnologia de Equipamentos. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Brazilian Corrosion Association.
Zarghamee, M. S., R. P. Ojdrovic, and P. D. Nardini. 2012. Best practices manual for prestressed concrete pipe condition assessment: What Works? What Doesn’t? What’s Next? Denver: Water Research Foundation.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13Issue 4November 2022

History

Received: Sep 1, 2021
Accepted: Jun 15, 2022
Published online: Aug 26, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 26, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Yehuda Kleiner, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.Eng.
Rajani Consultants Inc., 804—370 De Mazenod, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5X2 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Balvant Rajani, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.Eng.
Principal, Rajani Consultants Inc., 804—370 De Mazenod, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5X2. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Economics of Inspection and Condition Assessment of High-Consequence Water Pipeline and Assessing Its Remaining Life, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1597, 15, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share