Technical Papers
May 19, 2022

Accuracy of Pull Force Estimation for Steel Pipe Installations Using Horizontal Directional Drilling: Review of 200 Case Studies

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13, Issue 3

Abstract

Pull force estimation in horizontal directional drilling (HDD) is an essential step during the planning phases. Pull force calculation can be relatively complicated when considering variations during the HDD construction process compared with the design phases. Simplifications and assumptions need to be made as part of current design practice to approximate the pull forces expected in HDD pullback operations. However, a comprehensive assessment of pull force prediction accuracy has not been completed to date. A brief review of the current design practice and industry accepted engineering assumptions for pull force calculation for steel pipe is presented in this work. Data from 200 recent commercial HDD projects were studied to compare actual and predicted pull forces. The accuracy of the predictions was investigated based on different project categories such as pipe size, crossing length, geotechnical conditions, and equipment sizes. This study suggests that assumptions for pull force estimations need to be selected based on project-specific scopes and construction execution to increase the accuracy of pull force predictions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including general information of the case studies summarized in this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge CCI Inc. for technical and financial contributions, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for financial support. Thanks also are given to Lana Gutwin of the Consortium of Trenchless Technologies for her assistance in the preparation of this paper.

References

ASME. 2019. Pipeline transportation systems for liquids and slurries. ASME B31.4. New York: ASME.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for standard penetration test (SPT) and split-barrel sampling of soils. ASTM D1586/D1586M-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard guide for use of maxi-horizontal directional drilling for placement of polyethylene pipe or conduit under obstacles, including river crossings. ASTM F1962-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Baumert, M. E., and E. N. Allouche. 2002. “Methods for estimating pipe pullback loads for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) crossings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:1(12).
Baumert, M. E., E. N. Allouche, and I. D. Moore. 2004. “Experimental investigation of pull loads and borehole pressures during horizontal directional drilling installations.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (4): 672–685. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-090.
Baumert, M. E., E. N. Allouche, and I. D. Moore. 2005. “Drilling fluid considerations in design of engineered horizontal directional drilling installations.” Int. J. Geomech. 5 (4): 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(339).
Cai, L., and M. A. Polak. 2019. “A theoretical solution to predict pulling forces in horizontal directional drilling installations.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 83 (Sep): 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.014.
Chehab, A. G. 2008. “Time dependent response of pulled-in-place HDPE pipes.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Oil and gas pipeline systems. CSA Z662-19. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA Group.
Duyvestyn, G. 2009. “Comparison of predicted and observed HDD installation loads for various calculation methods.” In Proc., North American Society for Trenchless Technology No-Dig Conf. & Show. Toronto, ON, Canada: North American Society for Trenchless Technology.
El Chazli, G., S. Hinchberger, M. Baumert, and E. N. Allouche. 2005. “Experimental investigation of borehole and surface friction coefficients during HDD installations.” In Proc., North American Society for Trenchless Technology No-Dig Conf. & Show. Cleveland, OH: North American Society for Trenchless Technology.
Faghih, A., Y. Yi, A. Bayat, and M. Osbak. 2015. “Fluidic drag estimation in horizontal directional drilling based on flow equations.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 6 (4): 04015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000200.
Haciislamoglu, M., and J. Langlinais. 1990. “Non-Newtonian flow in eccentric annuli.” J. Energy Resour. Technol. 112 (3): 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2905753.
Huey, D. P., J. D. Hair, and K. B. McLeod. 1996. “Installation loading and stress analysis involved with pipelines installed in horizontal directional drilling.” In Proc., North American Society for Trenchless Technology 1996 No-Dig Show. Cleveland, OH: North American Society for Trenchless Technology.
Kruse, H. M. G., and H. J. A. M. Hergarden. 2010. “Soil loads on pipelines: The Dutch approach.” In Proc., 5th Pipeline Technology Conf. Hannover, Germany: Pipeline Technology Conference.
Maidla, E. E., and A. K. Wojtanowicz. 1990. “Laboratory study of borehole friction factor with a dynamic-filtration apparatus.” SPE Drill. Eng. 5 (3): 247–255. https://doi.org/10.2118/18558-PA.
NASTT (North American Society for Trenchless Technology). 2017. NASTT’s horizontal directional drilling (HDD) good practices guidelines. Cleveland, OH: Horizontal Directional Drilling Consortium.
NEN (Royal Netherlands Standardization Institute). 2020. Requirements for pipeline systems. NEN 3650:2020. Delft, Netherlands: Netherlands Standardization Institute.
PRCI (Pipeline Research Council International). 2015. Installation of pipeline by horizontal directional drilling—An engineering guide. PR-277-144507-R01. Chantilly, VA: PRCI.
Puckett, J. S. 2003. “Analysis of theoretical versus actual HDD pulling loads.” In Proc., Pipelines 2003—Pipeline Engineering and Construction Int. Conf. 2003. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rabiei, M., Y. Yi, A. Bayat, R. Cheng, and M. Osbak. 2017. “Estimation of hydrokinetic pressure and fluidic drag changes during pipe installations via HDD based on identifying slurry-flow pattern change within a borehole.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 8 (4): 04017020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000285.
Sheiner, L. B., and S. L. Beal. 1981. “Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.” J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 9 (4): 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01060893.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 13Issue 3August 2022

History

Received: May 26, 2021
Accepted: Mar 24, 2022
Published online: May 19, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 19, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ashkan Faghih, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.Eng.
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, 9211 116 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9; Senior Project Manager, CCI Inc., 17816 118 Ave. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T5S 1L6. Email: [email protected]
Alireza Bayat, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.Eng.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, 9211 116 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share