Technical Papers
Mar 24, 2021

Optimal Rehabilitation of Gas Distribution Pipelines in Liquefiable Soils Considering Seismic Reliability

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12, Issue 3

Abstract

Continuous functioning of gas distribution networks (GDNs) is important in the aftermath of an earthquake. Liquefaction has been found to cause a majority of the damages to buried pipeline infrastructure during an earthquake. A model for quantifying the seismic reliability of city-level GDNs is presented in this study. The seismic reliability model was used to select optimal rehabilitation alternatives for buried gas pipelines. Cured-in-place lining (CIPL) and replacement of aging pipelines with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipelines using the pipe bursting method were considered as rehabilitation alternatives in the study. A synthetic GDN was designed appropriately using the land-use pattern of the peninsular region of Charleston, South Carolina for demonstration purposes, and the 1886 Charleston earthquake was selected as the representative seismic hazard. Serviceability of the GDN was adopted as the basis for the reliability assessment using the Monte Carlo simulation approach, and a computationally efficient gas-flow model was developed to quantify the serviceability. For the selected seismic hazard, the reliability of the GDN in the study area was found to be 16.78%, and it increased to 18.62% after CIPL lining of all the pipelines. Replacement of all aging pipes with HDPE increased the reliability further to 26.94%. The optimization results informed the optimal selection of the rehabilitation alternative for each pipeline to maximize seismic reliability of the GDN at the cheapest possible cost. The proposed seismic reliability assessment approach and its use for rehabilitation planning will aid gas pipeline operators in their capital improvement works.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. CRISP-1638321. All the views and interpretations presented in the paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of NSF on the topics discussed herein. The authors also thank the trenchless industry professionals who provided pipeline renewal cost data for this study.

References

ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. “Seismic fragility formulations for water systems: Part 1—Guidelines.” Accessed January 20, 2020. http://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com/pdf/Part_1_Guideline.pdf.
Ameri, M. R., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2019. “Seismic performance and recovery modeling of natural gas networks at the community level using building demand.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 33 (4): 04019043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001315.
Argyrou, C., D. Bouziou, T. D. O’Rourke, and H. E. Stewart. 2018. “Retrofitting pipelines with cured-in-place linings for earthquake-induced ground deformations.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.015.
ASCE. 1984. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems, 473–473. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ayala, A. G., and M. J. O’Rourke. 1989. “Effects of the 1985 Michoacan earthquake on water systems and other buried lifelines in Mexico.” Accessed January 20, 2020. https://nehrpsearch.nist.gov/static/files/NSF/PB89207229.pdf.
Ayala H, L. F., and C. Y. Leong. 2013. “A robust linear-pressure analog for the analysis of natural gas transportation networks.” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 14 (Sep): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2013.06.008.
Chenna, R., A. Singh, K. Mohan, and P. Ramcharla. 2014. “Vulnerability assessment of buried pipelines: A case study.” Front. Geotech. Eng. 3 (1): 24–33.
Cret, L., F. Yamazaki, S. Nagata, and T. Katayama. 1993. “Earthquake damage estimation and decision analysis for emergency shut-off of city gas networks using fuzzy set theory.” Struct. Saf. 12 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(93)90015-S.
Crompton, T. R. 2012. “Mechanical properties of polymers.” Chap. 1 in Physical testing of plastics, 1–125. Shropshire, UK: Smithers Rapra Technology.
Dominion Energy. 2018. “Operational capacity report. Dominion energy Carolina gas transmission, LLC.” Accessed January 10, 2019. https://ebb.dominionenergy.com/InformationalPostings/Capacity/OperAvail.aspx.
Elhmadi, K., and M. J. O’Rourke. 1990. “Seismic damage to segmented buried pipelines.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19 (4): 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190405.
Elton, D. J., and T. Hadj-Hamou. 1990. “Liquefaction potential map for Charleston, South Carolina.” J. Geotech. Eng. 116 (2): 244–265.
Farahmandfar, Z., K. R. Piratla, and R. D. Andrus. 2016. “Resilience evaluation of water supply networks against seismic hazards.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 8 (1): 04016014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000251.
FEMA. 2012. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model: Hazus-MH 2.1 user manual, 863. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Hashemi, B., T. Iseley, and J. Raulston. 2011. Water pipeline renewal evaluation using AWWA Class IV CIPP, pipe bursting, and open-cut. ICPTT 2011: Sustainable Solutions for Water, Sewer, Gas, and Oil Pipelines—Proc., of the Int. Conf. on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology 2011, 1257–1266. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41202(423)133.
Hayati, H., and R. D. Andrus. 2008. “Liquefaction potential map of Charleston, South Carolina based on the 1886 earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (6): 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(815).
Housner, G. W., and P. C. Jennings. 1972. “The San Fernando California earthquake.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1 (1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290010103.
Iwasaki, T., T. Arakawa, and K.-I. Tokida. 1984. “Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 3 (1): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(84)90027-5.
Kongar, I., S. Giovinazzi, and T. Rossetto. 2017. “Seismic performance of buried electrical cables: evidence-based repair rates and fragility functions.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (7): 3151–3181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0077-3.
Liu, D., W. Zhou, and S. He. 2017. “Risk assessment for urban gas transmission and distribution system using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 9 (1): 04017038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000307.
Liu, W., Z. Li, Z. Song, and J. Li. 2018. “Seismic reliability evaluation of gas supply networks based on the probability density evolution method.” Struct. Saf. 70: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.10.001.
Miao, H., W. Liu, C. Wang, and J. Li. 2016. “Artificial earthquake test of gas supply networks.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 90 (Feb): 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.022.
Najafi, M. 2007. Pipe bursting projects: ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 112. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Nakai, K., and T. Yokoyama. 2015. “Uniaxial compressive response and constitutive modeling of selected polymers over a wide range of strain rates.” J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. 1 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-015-0003-9.
Netravali, A. N., T. D. O’Rourke, S. Shaw, and T. Bond. 2003. Evaluation of Starline 2000-PSE cured-in-place lining system for cast iron gas distribution pipelines. New York: New York Gas Group.
Nuti, C., A. Rasulo, and I. Vanzi. 2010. “Seismic safety of network structures and infrastructures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (1–2): 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663813.
O’Rourke, M., and C. Nordberg. 1992. “Behavior of buried pipelines subject to permanent ground deformation.” Accessed July 19–24, 1992. http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/10_vol9_5411.pdf.
O’Rourke, T. D., J. M. Jezerski, N. A. Olson, A. L. Bonneau, M. C. Palmer, H. E. Stewart, M. J. O’rourke, and T. Abdoun. 2008. “Geotechnics of pipeline system response to earthquakes.” In Proc., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, 1–38. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40975(318)193.
Petersen, M. D., A. D. Frankel, S. C. Harmsen, C. S. Mueller, K. M. Haller, R. L. Wheeler, and K. S. Rukstales. 2008. “Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps.” Accessed February 10, 2021. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1128/ofr20081128v1.1.pdf.
Poljanšek, K., F. Bono, and E. Gutiérrez. 2012. “Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: The case of European gas and electricity networks.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (1): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1118.
Praks, P., V. Kopustinskas, and M. Masera. 2017. “Monte-Carlo-based reliability and vulnerability assessment of a natural gas transmission system due to random network component failures.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 2 (3): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1294881.
Prasad, V., K. R. Piratla, B. Caswell, and S. Banerjee. 2020. “Seismic reliability evaluation of city-level gas distribution networks using flow-based simulation modeling.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability, 390–398. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Psyrras, N. K., and A. G. Sextos. 2018. “Safety of buried steel natural gas pipelines under earthquake-induced ground shaking: A review.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 106: 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2017.12.020.
Ramberg, W., and W. Osgood. 1943. “Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters.” Accessed January 20, 2020. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930081614.
Scawthorn, C., M. Miyajima, Y. Ono, J. Kiyono, and M. Hamada. 2006. “Lifeline aspects of the 2004 Niigata Ken Chuetsu, Japan, earthquake.” Supplement, Earthquake Spectra 22 (1): 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2173932.
Simicevic, J., and R. Sterling. 2003. “Survey of bid prices for trenchless methods.” Accessed August 4, 2020. http://library.ttcils.latech.edu/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=17979&query_desc=kw%2Cwrdl%3A.
Singhal, A. C., and J. C. Benavides. 1983. “Axial and bending behavior of pipeline joints.” Accessed August 4, 2020. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41272928.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ad8f2b908b0c9a984c824100bba9b96d5.
Stern, R. E., J. Song, and D. B. Work. 2017. “Accelerated Monte Carlo system reliability analysis through machine-learning-based surrogate models of network connectivity.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 164 (Aug): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2017.01.021.
Stewart, H. E., T. D. O’rourke, B. P. Wham, A. N. Netravali, C. Argyrou, and X. Zeng. 2015. Performance testing of field-aged cured-in-place liners (CIPL) for cast iron piping: Final report. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Tchórzewska-Cieślak, B., K. Pietrucha-Urbanik, M. Urbanik, and J. R. Rak. 2018. “Approaches for safety analysis of gas-pipeline functionality in terms of failure occurrence: A case study.” Energies 11 (6): 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061589.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2020. “CPI inflation calculator.” Accessed July 17, 2020. https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm.
Yiğit, A., M. A. Lav, and A. Gedikli. 2017. “Vulnerability of natural gas pipelines under earthquake effects.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 9 (1): 04017036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ps.1949-1204.0000295.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12Issue 3August 2021

History

Received: Jan 21, 2020
Accepted: Nov 19, 2020
Published online: Mar 24, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 24, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Formerly, Graduate Research Assistant, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-7217. Email: [email protected]
Liles Associate Professor, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-7598. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share