Abstract

Water utilities are often required to continue building and improving their water infrastructure assets to meet increasing demands. Innovative project delivery methods, such as design–build (DB), integrate the design and construction phases and are implemented by water utilities to further advance the delivery of their water transmission pipeline projects. The objective of this study was to present effective DB project administration practices specifically for the water industry. An elaborate interview protocol was developed to collect information from utilities that have extensive experience delivering DB water projects. Interviews were conducted with 10 utilities in the United States and Canada. DB practices were examined under seven key DB project administration categories. A selection of effective DB project administration practices revealed by this study include (1) using a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) and finalizing it later in the design process; (2) providing the risk register to the design–builder to maintain during the design and construction process; and (3) using qualification-based procurement. This study contributes to the literature by identifying a wide selection of effective DB project administration practices that may support utilities in the delivery of their water infrastructure projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party (i.e., procurement practices, cost and schedule management practices). Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the Water Research Foundation (WRF) Project No. 4753. The authors would also like to thank all industry experts and collaborators for supporting this research effort.

References

ACRP (Airport Cooperative Research Program). 2009. A guidebook for selecting airport capital project delivery methods. Washington, DC: ACRP.
ASCE. 2017. 2017 report card for America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bogus, S. M., J. S. Shane, and K. R. Molenaar. 2010. “Comparison of water/wastewater project performance by project delivery system and payment provision.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2010, 859–868. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41109(373)86.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Burnard, P., P. Gill, K. Stewart, E. Treasure, and B. Chadwick. 2008. “Analysing and presenting qualitative data.” Br. Dent. J. 204 (8): 429–432. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292.
Chi, M. 1997. “Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide.” J. Learn. Sci. 6 (3): 271–315. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1.
Comstock, K. 2011. “Using design-build to create the next generation water reuse facility: The Johns Creek environmental campus.” In Proc., American Water Works Association: 2011 Annual Conf. Washington, DC: American Water Works Association.
Culp, G. 2011. “Alternative project delivery methods for water and wastewater projects: Do they save time and money?” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 11 (3): 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000133.
Dabbs, J. M., Jr. 1982. “Making things visible.” In Varieties of qualitative research, edited by J. Van Maanen, J. M. Dabbs Jr., and R. F. Faulkner, 31–66. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
DBIA (Design-Build Institute of America). 2015. Water and wastewater sector: Design-build best practices. Washington, DC: DBIA.
El Asmar, M., A. Hanna, and W. Loh. 2013. “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000744.
El Asmar, M., A. Hanna, and W. Loh. 2016. “Evaluating integrated project delivery using the project quarterback rating.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (1): 04015046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001015.
Feghaly, J., M. El Asmar, and S. Ariaratnam. Forthcoming. “A comparison of project delivery method performance for water infrastructure capital projects.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2019-0508.
Feghaly, J., M. El Asmar, and S. Ariaratnam. 2019. “Selecting project delivery methods for water treatment plants.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (4): 936–951. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0308.
Feghaly, J., M. El Asmar, and S. Ariaratnam. 2020. “State of professional practice for water infrastructure project delivery.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 25 (3): 04020018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000500.
Francom, T., S. Ariaratnam, and M. El Asmar. 2016. “Industry perceptions of alternative project delivery methods applied to trenchless pipeline projects.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 7 (1): 04015020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000220.
Gates, S. R., L. H. Bonner, J. Batista, and P. P. Shrestha. 2015. Lessons learned by owners using design-build project delivery. Edgewater, MD: Water Design-Build Council.
Harper, C., and C. Waldrop. 2016. “Integrating project teams with the use of partnering.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, 508–518. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.052.
Hill, R., G. Reed, and J. Crutchfield. 2007. “Design and construction of large diameter steel yard piping for a ‘fast-track’ design-build-operate (DBO) 100 MGD water treatment plant.” In Proc., ASCE Pipelines 2007. Reston, VA: ASCE.
King, N. 2004. “Using templates in the thematic analysis of text.” In Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, edited by C. Cassels and G. Symon, 257–270. London: Sage.
Lapinski, A., M. Horman, and D. Riley. 2006. “Lean process for sustainable project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (10): 1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:10(1083).
Molenaar, K. R., S. M. Bogus, and J. M. Priestley. 2004. “Design/build for water/wastewater facilities: State of the industry survey and three case studies.” J. Manage. Eng. 20 (1): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:1(16).
Molenaar, K. R., and B. Franz. 2018. Revisiting project delivery performance. Charles Pankow Foundation Rep. No. 02-18. Austin, TX: Charles Pankow Foundation and Construction Industry Institute.
Molenaar, K. R., and A. D. Songer. 1998. “Model for public sector design-build project selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (6): 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(467).
Nowell, L. S., J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.” Int. J. Qual. Methods 16 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
Papajohn, D., M. El Asmar, K. Molenaar, and D. Alleman. 2020. “Comparing contract administration functions for alternative and traditional delivery of highway projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (1): 04019038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000727.
Ramsey, D., M. El Asmar, and G. E. Gibson Jr. 2016. “Quantitative performance assessment of single-step versus two-step design-build procurement.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 04016033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001145.
Rao, T. 2009. “Is design-build right for your next WWW project?” Proc. Water Environ. Fed. 2009 (9): 6444–6458. https://doi.org/10.2175/193864709793957210.
Rowley, J. 2012. “Conducting research interviews.” Manage. Res. Rev. 35 (3–4): 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211210154.
Shrestha, P. P., R. Maharajan, and J. R. Batista. 2019. “Performance of design-build and construction manager-at-risk methods in water and wastewater projects.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 24 (1): 04018029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000398.
Swarup, L., S. Korkmaz, P. Gulrekin, and M. Horman. 2012. “Exploring the validity of qualitative methods to analyze project delivery of sustainable, high performance buildings.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2010, 1427–1436. Reston, VA: ASCE.
TCRP (Transit Cooperative Research Program). 2009. A guidebook for the evaluation of project delivery methods. Washington, DC: Transit Cooperative Research Program.
WDBC (Water Design-Build Council). 2016. Water and wastewater design-build handbook. 4th ed. Edgewater, MD: WDBC.
WSCPARB (Washington State Capital Project Advisory Review Board). 2017. Design-build best practices guidelines. Olympia, WA: Washington State Dept. of Enterprise Services.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12Issue 1February 2021

History

Received: Feb 20, 2020
Accepted: Aug 17, 2020
Published online: Nov 13, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Apr 13, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 873005, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-4844. Email: [email protected]
Mounir El Asmar, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. Email: [email protected]
P.E.
Professor and Construction Engineering Program Chair, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5973-0655. Email: [email protected]
Wylie Bearup, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor of Practice and Beavers-Ames Heavy Civil Chair, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share