Technical Papers
Sep 18, 2020

Subsea Pipelines Leak-Modeling Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12, Issue 1

Abstract

Pipelines laid over long distances in harsh offshore environments may be affected by excessive strain, corrosion, scouring, icebergs, and other third-party damage. Small chronic leaks may cause severe safety and environmental effects if left undetected for a long time. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a subsea leaking pipeline is developed to predict the pressure and temperature profiles around the pipe’s leak surroundings. The developed CFD is used to study a pipeline section with a leak on top. In addition, a hydrodynamic model is used to evaluate the parameters of a full-scale model for a 150-km long-distance pipeline. This hydrodynamic model is developed to find the segment of the pipeline where it is difficult to detect the leak (e.g., segment with low temperature and pressure) in the long pipeline system. Furthermore, the hydrodynamic model provides the boundary conditions for the CFD model. The present study will help pipeline operators to select the most appropriate leak detection technology for the pipeline system. In particular, sensitivity analysis using the CFD model will assist pipeline operators to optimize direct sensing technologies including fiber optic cable distributed sensing solutions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, Canada Research Chair (Tier I) program. Special thanks to the Siemens PLM group for the technical support provided for the STAR-CCM application.

References

Afebu, K., A. Abbas, G. Nasr, and A. Kadir. 2015. “Integrated leak detection in gas pipelines using OLGA simulator and artificial neural networks.” In Proc., Abu Dhabi Int. Petroleum Exhibition and Conf. London: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Akpabio, J. U., S. O. Isehunwa, and O. O. Akinsete. 2015. “PVT fluid sampling, characterization and gas condensate reservoir modeling.” Adv. Res. 5 (5): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/AIR/2015/16000.
Ben-Mansour, R., M. Habib, A. Khalifa, K. Youcef-Toumi, and D. Chatzigeorgiou. 2012. “Computational fluid dynamic simulation of small leaks in water pipelines for direct leak pressure transduction.” Comput. Fluids 57 (Mar): 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.12.016.
Billmann, L., and R. Isermann. 1987. “Leak detection methods for pipelines.” Automatica 23 (3): 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(87)90011-2.
Brones, H., and H. Schaffhaussen. 1972. “European methods of leak detection and location.” Pipeline Ind. 50–66.
Brunone, B. 1999. “A transient test-based technique for leak detection in outfall pipes.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 125 (5): 302–306. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:5(302).
Cloete, S., J. E. Olsen, and P. Skjetne. 2009. “CFD modeling of plume and free surface behavior resulting from a sub-sea gas release.” Appl. Ocean Res. 31 (3): 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2009.09.005.
Colombo, A. F., P. J. Lee, and B. W. Karney. 2009. “A selective literature review of transient-based leak detection methods.” J. Hydro Environ. Res. 2 (4): 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2009.02.003.
De Schepper, S. C., G. J. Heynderickx, and G. B. Marin. 2008. “CFD modeling of all gas–liquid and vapor–liquid flow regimes predicted by the Baker chart.” Chem. Eng. J. 138 (1): 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.06.007.
de Vasconcellos Araújo, M., F. D. T. de Luna, E. S. Barbosa, S. R. de Farias Neto, and A. G. B. de Lima. 2013. “Numerical study of oil flow in tee junction with leaks.” Adv. Pet. Explor. Dev. 6 (2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.aped.1925543820130602.1803.
Eisler, B., and G. A. Lanan. 2012. “Fiber optic leak detection systems for subsea pipelines.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Isermann, R. 1984. “Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods—A survey.” Automatica 20 (4): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(84)90098-0.
Isermann, R. 1996. “Model-based fault diagnosis of technical systems—Approach principles and examples.” Zeitschrift fuer Flugwissenschaften und Weltraumforschung 20 (1): 1–17.
Isermann, R., and B. Freyermuth. 1991. “Process fault diagnosis based on process model knowledge: Part I—Principles for fault diagnosis with parameter estimation.” J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr. 113 (4): 620–626. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2896466.
Jujuly, M., P. Thodi, A. Rahman, and F. Khan. 2016. “Computational fluid dynamics modeling of subsea pipeline leaks in arctic conditions.” In Proc., Arctic Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Kumar, V., and K. Nigam. 2017. “Multiphase fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics in micro channels.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 169 (Sep): 34–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.018.
Li, L. J., R. Pan, W. H. Zhang, and H. Li. 2013. “Overview of fiber optic pipeline monitoring sensors.” In Applied mechanics and materials. 872–876. Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
Liang, W., L. Zhang, Q. Xu, and C. Yan. 2013. “Gas pipeline leakage detection based on acoustic technology.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 31 (Jul): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.020.
Liggett, J. A., and L. C. Chen. 1994. “Inverse transient analysis in pipe networks.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 120 (8): 934–955. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:8(934).
Liou, J. C., and J. Tian. 1995. “Leak detection—Transient flow simulation approaches.” J. Energy Res. Technol. 117 (3): 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2835348.
Loparo, K. A., M. Buchner, and K. S. Vasudeva. 1991. “Leak detection in an experimental heat exchanger process: A multiple model approach.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 36 (2): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.67292.
Murvay, P., and I. Silea. 2012. “A survey on gas leak detection and localization techniques.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 (6): 966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.05.010.
Reddy, R. S., G. Payal, P. Karkulali, M. Himanshu, A. Ukil, and J. Dauwels. 2016. “Pressure and flow variation in gas distribution pipeline for leak detection.” In Proc., 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Industrial Technology, 679–683. New York: IEEE.
Saleh, A., and G. Stewart. 1992. “Interpretation of gas condensate well tests with field examples.” In Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition. London: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Scott, S. L., and M. A. Barrufet. 2003. Worldwide assessment of industry leak detection capabilities for single & multiphase pipelines. College Station, TX: Offshore Technology Research Center College Station.
Scott, S. L., and J. Yi. 1998. “Detection of critical flow leaks in deepwater gas flow lines.” In Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition. London: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Siebenaler, S., M. Iyer, M. Kulkarni, and N. Salmatanis. 2015. “Thermal characterization of potential leaks in offshore pipelines.” In Proc., OTC Arctic Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Tafreshi, R., Z. Khan, M. Franchek, and K. Grigoriadis. 2015. “Two-phase heat transfer modeling in subsea pipelines.” In Integrated systems: Innovations and applications, 243–256. Berlin: Springer.
Thodi, P., M. Paulin, L. Forster, J. Burke, and G. Lanan. 2014. “Arctic pipeline leak detection using fiber optic cable distributed sensing systems.” In Proc., OTC Arctic Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Turner, N. 1991. “Hardware and software techniques for pipeline integrity and leak detection monitoring.” In Offshore Europe. London: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Wang, G., D. Dong, and C. Fang. 1993. “Leak detection for transport pipelines based on autoregressive modeling.” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 42 (1): 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/19.206686.
Willsky, A. S. 1976. “A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems.” Automatica 12 (6): 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(76)90041-8.
Xu, X., and B. Karney. 2017. “An overview of transient fault detection techniques.” In Modeling and monitoring of pipelines and networks, 13–37. Berlin: Springer.
Zhang, J. 1997. “Designing a cost-effective and reliable pipeline leak-detection system.” Pipes Pipelines Int. 42 (1): 20–26.
Zhu, H., P. Lin, and Q. Pan. 2014. “A CFD (computational fluid dynamic) simulation for oil leakage from damaged submarine pipeline.” Energy 64 (Jan): 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.037.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 12Issue 1February 2021

History

Received: Feb 7, 2020
Accepted: Jun 11, 2020
Published online: Sep 18, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 18, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yousef Abdulhafed Yousef [email protected]
Graduate Student, Centre for Risk Integrity and Safety Engineering, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5. Email: [email protected]
Syed Imtiaz [email protected]
Associate Professor, Centre for Risk Integrity and Safety Engineering, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Faisal Khan [email protected]
Professor, Centre for Risk Integrity and Safety Engineering, Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share