Technical Papers
May 30, 2020

Assessing the Accuracy of an Outdoor Augmented Reality Solution for Mapping Underground Utilities

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11, Issue 3

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) has been identified as a technique that can enhance information extraction from the virtual world to the real world and improve the access and utilization of information. The main challenge in creating a reliable and adaptive outdoor AR system is the accurate registration of virtual objects in the real world. There is currently limited research using outdoor AR for collecting underground utility inventory and evaluating the accuracy. Because of the limited accuracy of smartphones, this study used external GPS devices to reduce positional error. The main objective of this research was to evaluate the horizontal accuracy of the captured data used by the AR phone application XR-GIS, developed by the authors. This study used root-mean-square error (RMSE), average Euclidean error (AEE), and central error (CE) in the evaluation of two smartphones and two popular GPS devices on 16 survey location points. Leveraging a Trimble S5 robotic total station, a geodetic base point and the location points used in the study were authoritatively measured. The results show that the smartphone accuracies were significantly different compared with smartphones linked to external GPS devices. Generally, the results suggest that current smartphones cannot be adopted in the underground construction industry without higher-accuracy integrated GPS devices.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. These include: (1) data collected of existing utilities, (2) data modeled and aligned into 3D virtual content using GPS, and (3) GPS receiver error data.

References

Azuma, R. T. 1997. “A survey of augmented reality.” Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6 (4): 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355.
Behzadan, A. H., S. Dong, and V. R. Kamat. 2015. “Augmented reality visualization: A review of civil infrastructure system applications.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 29 (2): 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.03.005.
Box, G. E., W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter. 1978. Statistics for experimenters: An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Côté, S., and A. Mercier. 2018. “Augmentation of road surfaces with subsurface utility model projections.” In Proc., 2018 IEEE Conf. on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interface, 535–536. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446545.
Devore, J. 1991. Probability and statistics for engineering and science. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
DIRT (Damage Information Reporting Tool). 2017. “DIRT report for 2017.” Accessed May 12, 2019. http://commongroundalliance.com/media-reports/dirt-report-2017.
Fenais, A., S. T. Ariaratnam, S. K. Ayer, and N. Smilovsky. 2019. “Integrating geographic information systems and augmented reality for mapping underground utilities.” Infrastructures 4 (4): 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040060.
FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee). 1998. Content standard of digital geospatial metadata. Reston, VA: FGDC.
Forcada, N., M. Casals, A. Fuertes, M. Gangolells, and X. Roca. 2010. “A web-based system for sharing and disseminating research results: The underground construction case study.” Autom. Constr. 19 (4): 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.018.
Hall, J. E., J. A. Hammerschmidt, J. J. Goglia, G. W. Black Jr., and C. J. Carmody. 1998. Natural gas pipeline rupture and subsequent explosion. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board.
Huang, W., M. Sun, and S. Li. 2016. “A 3D GIS-based interactive registration mechanism for outdoor augmented reality system.” Expert Syst. Appl. 55 (Aug): 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.037.
Karsky, D. 2001. Comparison of GPS receivers under a forest canopy: (Microform). Missoula, MT: US Dept. of Agriculture.
Lee, L., M. Jones, G. S. Ridenour, S. J. Bennett, A. C. Majors, B. L. Melito, and M. J. Wilson. 2016. “Comparison of accuracy and precision of GPS-enabled mobile devices.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Information and Technology, 73–82. New York: IEEE.
Li, S., H. Cai, and V. R. Kamat. 2015. “Uncertainty-aware geospatial system for mapping and visualizing underground utilities.” Autom. Constr. 53 (May): 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.011.
Makana, L., N. Metje, I. Jefferson, and C. Rogers. 2016. What do utility strikes really cost? Birmingham, UK: School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Birmingham.
Marvin, S., and S. Slater. 1997. “Urban infrastructure: The contemporary conflict between roads and utilities.” Progress Plann. 48 (4): 247–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(97)00011-1.
Mullan, P., C. Riess, and F. Freiling. 2019. “Forensic source identification using JPEG image headers: The case of smartphones.” Digital Invest. 28 (Apr): S68–S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.016.
Nelson, C. M., R. H. Iwasaki, R. K. Arulraj, and M. E. Ayers. 2012. SHRP 2 tools for underground utility location, data collection, and analysis. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. Kutner. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. 3rd ed. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
Rankohi, S., and L. Waugh. 2013. “Review and analysis of augmented reality literature for construction industry.” Visualization Eng. 1 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2213-7459-1-9.
Renfro, B. A., M. Stein, N. Boeker, and A. Terry. 2018. “An analysis of global positioning system (GPS) standard positioning service (SPS) performance for 2017.” TR-SGL-18-02. Accessed May 4, 2019. https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/performance/2017-GPS-SPS-performance-analysis.pdf.
Roberts, G. W., A. Evans, A. Dodson, B. Denby, S. Cooper, and R. Hollands. 2002. “The use of augmented reality, GPS and INS for subsurface data visualization.” In Proc., FIG XXII Int. Congress, 1–12. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Federation of Surveyors.
Song, J., C. T. Haas, and C. H. Caldas. 2006. “Tracking the location of materials on construction job sites.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (9): 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:9(911).
Sterling, R., J. H. Anspach, E. N. Allouche, J. Simicevic, C. D. Rogers, K. E. Weston, and K. Hayes. 2009. Encouraging innovation in locating and characterizing underground utilities. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Su, X., S. Talmaki, H. Cai, and V. R. Kamat. 2013. “Uncertainty-aware visualization and proximity monitoring in urban excavation: A geospatial augmented reality approach.” Visualization Eng. 1 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2213-7459-1-2.
Tabarro, P., J. Pouliot, R. Fortier, and L.-M. Losier. 2017. “A WebGIS to support GPR 3D data acquisition: A first step for the integration of underground utility networks in 3D city models.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLII-4/W7: 43–48. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W7-43-2017.
Talmaki, S., and V. R. Kamat. 2012. “Real-time hybrid virtuality for prevention of excavation related utility strikes.” J. Comput. Civil Eng. 28 (3): 04014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000269.
Tomaštík, J., Jr., J. Tomaštík Sr., Š. Saloň, and R. Piroh. 2016. “Horizontal accuracy and applicability of smartphone GNSS positioning in forests.” For.: Int. J. Forest Res. 90 (2): 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpw031.
USGS. 1998. Geospatial positioning accuracy standards. 3: National standard for spatial data accuracy. Reston, VA: USGS.
Zhang, X., Y. Han, D. Hao, and Z. Lv. 2016. “ARGIS-based outdoor underground pipeline information system.” J. Visual Commun. Image Represent. 40 (Jul): 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.07.011.
Zou, P. X., P. Lun, D. Cipolla, and S. Mohamed. 2017. “Cloud-based safety information and communication system in infrastructure construction.” Saf. Sci. 98 (Oct): 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11Issue 3August 2020

History

Received: Jul 30, 2019
Accepted: Mar 2, 2020
Published online: May 30, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Amr Fenais, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Environmental and Sustainable Engineering, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 873005, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005. Email: [email protected]
Samuel T. Ariaratnam, Ph.D., F.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5973-0655 [email protected]
P.E.
Professor and Construction Engineering Program Chair, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State Univ., P.O. Box 873005, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5973-0655. Email: [email protected]
Nikolas Smilovsky, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Design, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share