Technical Papers
Feb 8, 2020

Pullout Resistance of Buried Pipeline in Cohesionless Soil Nearby Sloping Ground

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11, Issue 2

Abstract

The vertical and lateral pullout capacity of a long pipeline buried in a cohesionless soil nearby sloping ground has been investigated by using lower-bound limit analysis in combination with finite elements and linear optimization. The ultimate uplift and lateral resistances offered by the pipeline in cohesionless soil have been computed for different combinations of embedment ratio, slope angle, distance between slope crest and center line of the pipe, and soil friction angle. The results obtained for a pipeline buried in cohesionless soil with a horizontal ground surface compared well with the existing theoretical and experimental data. The present work illustrates that being near sloping ground can cause a significant reduction in the pullout resistance of a buried pipeline as long as it is located within the optimum crest distance. The effect of being near sloping ground has been found to be greater for a larger slope angle. The normalized optimum crest distance depends on the embedment ratio, slope angle, and soil friction angle of the ground soil. For a pipe subjected to lateral pulling, the values of optimum normalized crest distance are found to be higher than the pipe subjected to uplift. The proximity of the stress state to yield for different crest distances is presented to illustrate the failure mechanism.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data (such as the data points for Figs. 211) generated and used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

Bhattacharya, P., and A. Roy. 2016. “Variation of horizontal pullout capacity with width of vertical anchor plate.” Int. J. Geomech. 16 (5): 06016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000639.
Bottero, A., R. Negre, J. Pastor, and S. Turgeman. 1980. “Finite element method and limit analysis theory for soil mechanics problem.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 22 (1): 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(80)90055-9.
Calvetti, F., C. di Prosco, and R. Nova. 2004. “Experimental and numerical analysis of soil–pipe interaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (12): 1292–1299. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1292).
Chakraborty, D. 2018. “Lateral resistance of buried pipeline in cϕ soil.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 9 (1): 06017006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000289.
Chakraborty, D., and J. Kumar. 2014. “Vertical uplift resistance of pipes buried in sand.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 5 (1): 04013009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000149.
Chatterjee, S., D. J. White, and M. F. Randolph. 2013. “Coupled consolidation analysis of pipe-soil interaction.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (6): 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0307.
Cheuk, C. Y., D. J. White, and M. D. Bolton. 2008. “Uplift mechanisms of pipes buried in sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (2): 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:2(154).
Dickin, E. A. 1994. “Uplift resistance of buried pipelines in sand.” Soils Found. 34 (2): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.34.2_41.
Guo, P. 2005. “Numerical modeling of pipe–soil interaction under oblique loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (2): 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(260).
Guo, P. J., and D. F. E. Stolle. 2005. “Lateral pipe–soil interaction in sand with reference to scale effect.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (3): 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(338).
Jung, J. K., T. D. O’Rourke, and N. A. Olson. 2013a. “Lateral soil-pipe interaction in dry and partially saturated sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (12): 2028–2036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000960.
Jung, J. K., T. D. O’Rourke, and N. A. Olson. 2013b. “Uplift soil-pipe interaction in granular soil.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (7): 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0357.
Kumar, J. 2002. “Uplift response of buried pipes in sands using FEM.” Indian Geotech. J. 32 (2): 146–160.
Kumar, J., and V. N. Khatri. 2008. “Effect of footing roughness on lower bound Nγ values.” Int. J. Geomech. 8 (3): 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:3(176).
Ling, H. I., Y. Mohri, T. Kawabata, H. Liu, C. Burke, and L. Sun. 2003. “Centrifugal modeling of seismic behavior of large-diameter pipe in liquefiable soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (12): 1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1092).
Ling, H. I., L. Sun, H. Liu, Y. Mohri, and T. Kawabata. 2008. “Finite element analysis of pipe buried in saturated soil deposit subject to earthquake loading.” J. Earthquake Tsunami 2 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431108000244.
Maitra, S., S. Chatterjee, and D. Choudhury. 2016. “Generalized framework to predict undrained uplift capacity of buried offshore pipelines.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (11): 1841–1852. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0153.
Roy, K., B. Hawlader, S. Kenny, and I. Moore. 2018a. “Lateral resistance of pipes and strip anchors buried in dense sand.” Can. Geotech. J. 55 (12): 1812–1823. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0492.
Roy, K., B. Hawlader, S. Kenny, and I. Moore. 2018b. “Uplift failure mechanisms of pipes buried in dense sand.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (8): 04018087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001226.
Saeedzadeh, R., and N. Hataf. 2011. “Uplift response of buried pipelines in saturated sand deposit under earthquake loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (10): 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.013.
Sloan, S. W. 1988. “Lower boundlimit analysis using finite elements and linear programming.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 12 (1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610120105.
Sloan, S. W. 2013. “Geotechnical stability analysis.” Géotechnique 63 (7): 531–571. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.RL.001.
Trautmann, C. H., T. D. O’Rourfce, and F. H. Kulhawy. 1985. “Uplift force–displacement response of buried pipe.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (9): 1061–1076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:9(1061).
Trautmann, C. H., and T. D. O’Rourke. 1983. Behavior of pipe in dry sand under lateral and uplift loading. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
White, D. J., C. Y. Cheuk, and M. D. Bolton. 2008. “The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand.” Géotechnique 58 (10): 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.3692.
Yimsiri, S., K. Soga, K. Yoshizaki, G. R. Dasari, and T. D. O’Rourke. 2004. “Lateral and upward soil-pipeline interactions in sand for deep embedment conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(830).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11Issue 2May 2020

History

Received: Mar 15, 2019
Accepted: Sep 17, 2019
Published online: Feb 8, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 8, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-036X. Email: [email protected]
Sagarika Sahoo
Former Post Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share