Technical Papers
Dec 26, 2019

Underground Sewer Networks Renewal Complexity Assessment and Trenchless Technology: A Bayesian Belief Network and GIS Framework

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11, Issue 2

Abstract

Significant investment is required to upgrade deteriorating underground sewer networks. Sewer failure and the subsequent rehabilitation process can have economic, social, and environmental impacts. It can disrupt critical urban function and adjacent utilities, such as telecom, electric, gas, and water supply lines. This paper identifies 48 indicators to assess the renewal complexity and the failure consequence of buried sewer pipes. A Bayesian belief network (BBN) model is used to capture dependencies among indicators, quantify uncertainty, and update belief when new information becomes available. Geographic information system (GIS) applications are used to collect and process model input data as well as visualize analysis results. The framework can identify locations where trenchless rehabilitation may be cost effective. Finally, the proposed method is demonstrated on a storm sewer network in the city of Vernon, Canada.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments. Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship—Doctoral. We also thank the City of Vernon’s Infrastructure Management Department for providing data and support for the project. Maps throughout this paper were created using ArcGIS software by Esri. ArcGIS and ArcMap are the intellectual property of Esri and are used herein under license. Copyright © Esri. All rights reserved.

References

Abebe, Y., G. Kabir, and S. Tesfamariam. 2018. “Assessing urban areas vulnerability to pluvial flooding using GIS applications and Bayesian Belief Network model.” J. Cleaner Prod. 174 (Feb): 1629–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.066.
Adamtey, S., and L. Onsarigo. 2018. “Analysis of pipe-bursting construction risks using probability-impact model.” J. Eng. Des. Technol. 16 (3): 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-01-2018-0009.
Ana, E. V., and W. Bauwens. 2010. “Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: The state-of-the-art in statistical methods.” Urban Water J. 7 (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620903447597.
Apeldoorn, S. 2010. “Comparing the costs—Trenchless versus traditional methods.” Int. Society for Trenchless Technology Conf. Sydney: Australasian Society for Trenchless Technology.
ASCE. 2017. “2017 infrastructure report card.” Accessed May 20, 2019. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org.
AWWA (American Water Works Association). 2012. “Buried no longer: Confronting America’s water infrastructure challenge.” Accessed November 21, 2018. http://www.climateneeds.umd.edu/reports/American-Water-Works.pdf.
Baah, K., B. Dubey, R. Harvey, and E. McBean. 2015. “A risk-based approach to sanitary sewer pipe asset management.” Sci. Total Environ. 505 (Feb): 1011–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.040.
Canadian Infrastructure Report Card. 2016. “Stormwater infrastructure.” Accessed April 24, 2017. http://www.canadainfrastructure.ca/en/.
Carreras, B. A., V. E. Lynch, I. Dobson, and D. E. Newman. 2002. “Critical points and transitions in an electric power transmission model for cascading failure blackouts.” Chaos: Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 12 (4): 985–994. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1505810.
Carriço, N., D. I. C. Covas, M. Almeida, J. P. Leitão, and H. Alegre. 2012. “Prioritization of rehabilitation interventions for urban water assets using multiple criteria decision-aid methods.” Water Sci. Technol. 66 (5): 1007–1014. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.274.
Cockburn, G., and S. Tesfamariam. 2012. “Earthquake disaster risk index for Canadian cities using Bayesian belief networks.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Sys. Geohazards 6 (2): 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2011.650147.
Cooper, G. F. 1990. “The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks.” Artif. Intell. 42 (2–3): 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90060-D.
Cooper, G. F., and E. Herskovits. 1992. “A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data.” Mach. Learn. 9 (4): 309–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994110.
Diab, Y., and D. Morand. 2001. “An approach for the choice of rehabilitation techniques of urban sewers.” In Proc., Pipelines 2001: Advances in Pipelines Engineering and Construction, 1–7.
Fenais, A., N. Smilovsky, and S. T. Ariaratnam. 2018. “Using augmented reality in horizontal directional drilling to reduce the risk of utility damages.” In Proc., Pipelines 2018: Utility Engineering, Surveying, and Multidisciplinary Topics, 290–298. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Government of Alberta. 2009. “Occupational health and safety code 2009: Explanation guide—Open government.” Accessed November 21, 2018. https://open.alberta.ca/publications/4403880.
Halfawy, M. R., L. Dridi, and S. Baker. 2008. “Integrated decision support system for optimal renewal planning of sewer networks.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 22 (6): 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2008)22:6(360).
Hashemi, S. B. 2008. “Construction cost of underground infrastructure renewal: A comparison of traditional open-cut and pipe bursting technology.” Masters Abstracts Int. 47 (3).
Joseph, S. A., B. J. Adams, and B. McCabe. 2010. “Methodology for Bayesian belief network development to facilitate compliance with water quality regulations.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (1): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2010)16:1(58).
Jung, Y. J., and S. K. Sinha. 2007. “Evaluation of trenchless technology methods for municipal infrastructure system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13 (2): 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:2(144).
Kabir, G., N. B. C. Balek, and S. Tesfamariam. 2018. “Consequence-based framework for buried infrastructure systems: A Bayesian belief network model.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 180 (Dec): 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.037.
Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2014. “A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (9): 1176–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.795978.
Kabir, G., S. Tesfamariam, A. Francisque, and R. Sadiq. 2015. “Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240 (1): 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.033.
Kleiner, Y., B. Rajani, and R. Sadiq. 2006. “Failure risk management of buried infrastructure using fuzzy-based techniques.” J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 55 (2): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.075.
Kramer, S. R. 2012. An introduction to trenchless technology. New York: Springer.
Marchant, P. 2019. “Repair or replace: Technologies available for trenchless remediation of existing infrastructure.” In Water Scarcity and Ways to Reduce the Impact. 197–217. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Marzouk, M., and M. Omar. 2013. “Multiobjective optimization algorithm for sewer network rehabilitation.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (11): 1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.666254.
Matthews, J. C., and E. Allouche. 2006. Trenchless assessment guide for construction and replacement of underground utilities. Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana Tech Univ.
Matthews, J. C., E. Allouche, G. Vladeanu, and S. Alam. 2018. “Multi-segment trenchless technology method selection algorithm for buried pipelines.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 73 (Mar): 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.001.
Milligan, G. W., and C. D. Rogers. 2001. “Trenchless technology.” In Geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering handbook, edited by R. K. Rowe. Boston: Springer.
Nadkarni, S., and P. P. Shenoy. 2001. “A Bayesian network approach to making inferences in causal maps.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 128 (3): 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00368-9.
Najafi, M., and K. O. Kim. 2004. “Life-cycle-cost comparison of trenchless and conventional open-cut pipeline construction projects.” In Pipeline engineering and construction: What’s on the horizon? San Diego, California. 1–6.
Ndah, T. 2016. The buried pipeline replacement era: A cost-effectiveness analysis of pipeline replacement strategies for the Santa Clara valley water district. MSc thesis, San Jose State Univ.
Nielsen, T. D., and F. V. Jensen. 2007. Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
Norsys Software Corp. 2016. “Norsys Software Corp.—Bayes Net Software.” Accessed January 31, 2017. https://www.norsys.com/.
Ormsby, C. M. 2009. A framework for estimating the total cost of buried municipal infrastructure renewal projects: A case study in Montreal. Doctoral dissertation, McGill Univ.
Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Plenker, T. 2002. “Computer-aided decision support on choosing the right technology for sewer rehabilitation.” Water Sci. Technol. 46 (6–7): 403–410. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0706.
Ronald, L., and C. Dannie. 1988. “An exploratory analysis of excavation cave-in fatalities.” Prof. Saf. 33 (2): 24.
Safe Work Australia. 2015. “Model code of practice excavation work.” Accessed November 21, 2018. https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1705/mcop-excavation-work-v3.pdf.
Salman, B., and O. Salem. 2011. “Risk assessment of wastewater collection lines using failure models and criticality ratings.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 3 (3): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000100.
Shehab-Eldeen, T., and O. Moselhi. 2001. “A decision support system for rehabilitation of sewer pipes.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 28 (3): 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1139/l01-006.
Tang, Z., and B. McCabe. 2007. “Developing complete conditional probability tables from fractional data for Bayesian belief networks.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 21 (4): 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:4(265).
Tee, K. F., L. R. Khan, H. P. Chen, and A. M. Alani. 2014. “Reliability-based life cycle cost optimization for underground pipeline networks.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 43 (Jul): 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.04.007.
Thomsen, N., P. Binning, U. McKnight, N. Tuxen, P. Bjerg, and M. Troldborg. 2016. “A Bayesian belief network approach for assessing uncertainty in conceptual site models at contaminated sites.” J. Contam. Hydrol. 188 (May): 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.02.003.
Thomson, J., and P. Rumsey. 1997. “Trenchless technology applications for utility installation.” Arboricultural J. 21 (2): 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1997.9747158.
Van Riel, W., J. G. Langeveld, P. M. Herder, and F. H. L. R. Clemens. 2014. “Intuition and information in decision-making for sewer asset management.” Urban Water J. 11 (6): 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.904903.
Vladeanu, G. J., and J. C. Matthews. 2019. “Consequence-of-failure model for risk-based asset management of wastewater pipes using AHP.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000370.
Yuhua, D., and Y. Datao. 2005. “Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 18 (2): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2004.12.003.
Zhao, J. Q., and B. B. Rajani. 2002. Construction and rehabilitation costs for buried pipe with a focus on trenchless technologies. Ottawa: National Research Council, Institute for Research in Construction.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11Issue 2May 2020

History

Received: Mar 27, 2019
Accepted: Aug 8, 2019
Published online: Dec 26, 2019
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 26, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V1V7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8862-2757. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Solomon Tesfamariam, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V1V7. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share