Technical Papers
Apr 12, 2019

Modeling Subsea Pipeline Movement Subjected to Submarine Debris-Flow Impact

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10, Issue 3

Abstract

Deepwater pipelines are susceptible to destructive impacts from submarine debris flows. Understanding the subsea pipeline movement driven by submarine debris flow is critical to the optimization of pipeline routes and mitigation of submarine geohazards. In this paper, a coupling model of submarine debris flow with pipeline interaction is presented to investigate pipeline movement subjected to debris flow impact. The modeling domain of debris flow is represented by a structured grid system with discretized grid nodes. The dynamic properties of debris flow, such as velocities and heights, are calculated at each grid node. The pipeline is discretized into finite elements. Each element consists of two pipe nodes at the ends. The coordinates of each pipe node are determined using a particle tracking algorithm. The velocities of debris flow at the location of each pipe node are interpolated from the debris flow model and then converted to impact forces applied on each pipe node. An empirical formulation is proposed to estimate the displacements of each pipe node from a given Young’s modulus of pipe material and impact force applied by debris flow. The empirical relationship is developed from a series of numerical simulations conducted with the commercial software ABAQUS. The numerical simulations are performed using a simple model configuration subjected to uniformly distributed impact forces. Later, the coupled model is applied to two schematized cases representing continental shelves with a uniform slope and a sinuous canyon. The effects of the Young’s modulus of pipe material, initial failure height of debris flow, and the number of discretized pipe nodes on pipeline movement are investigated through a series of parametric studies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported primarily by the US Army Research Office (Grant No. W911NF1310128) and Fugro Corporation (Grant No. 636567). Partial support was also provided by the Coastal Hazards Center of Excellence and the Institute for Multimodal Transportation at Jackson State University and is greatly appreciated.

References

Abeele, F. V., and R. Denis. 2012. “Numerical modelling and analysis for offshore pipeline design, installation, and operation.” J. Pipeline Eng. 11 (4): 273–286.
Abeele, F. V., B. Spinewine, J. C. Ballard, R. Denis, and M. Knight. 2013. “Advanced finite element analysis to tackle challenging problems in pipeline geotechnics.” In Proc., Simulia Community Conf. Velizy-Villacoublay, France: Dassault Systemes.
Audibert, J. M. E., and K. J. Nyman. 1979. “Soil restraint against horizontal motion of pipes.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 105 (12): 1555–1558.
Bea, R. G., and R. P. Aurora. 1982. “Design of pipelines in mudslide areas.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Bruschi, R., S. Bughi, M. Spinazzè, E. Torselletti, and L. Vitali. 2006. “Impact of debris flows and turbidity currents on seafloor structures.” Norw. J. Geol. 86 (3): 317–337.
Das, H. S. 2012. Mass gravity flow analyses (Gorgon expansion project). Houston: Fugro Geoconsulting.
Herschel, W. H., and R. Bulkley. 1926. “Konsistenzmessungen von Gummi-Benzollösungen.” Kolloid Zeitschrift 39 (4): 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01432034.
Ingarfield, S., M. Sfouni-Grigoriadou, C. de Brier, and B. Spinewine. 2016. “The importance of soil characterization in modelling sediment density flows.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Kinash, O., and M. Najafi. 2012. “Large-diameter pipe subjected to landslide loads.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 3 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000091.
Kouretzis, G. P., D. K. Karamitros, and S. W. Sloan. 2015. “Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to ground surface settlement and heave.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (8): 1058–1071. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0332.
Liu, J., J. Tian, and P. Yi. 2015. “Impact forces of submarine landslides on offshore pipelines.” Ocean Eng. 95 (Feb): 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.003.
Parker, E. J., C. Traverso, R. Moore, T. Evans, and N. Usher. 2008. “Evaluation of landslide impact on deep water submarine pipelines.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Pazwash, H., and J. M. Robertson. 1975. “Forces on bodies in Bingham fluids.” J. Hydraul. Res. 13 (1): 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221687509499719.
Pirmez, C., J. Marr, C. Shipp, and F. Kopp. 2004. “Observations and numerical modeling of debris flows in the Na Kika Basin, Gulf of Mexico.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Qian, X., and H. S. Das. 2019. “Modeling subaqueous and subaerial muddy debris flows.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 145 (1): 04018083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001526.
Randolph, M. F., D. Seo, and D. J. White. 2010. “Parametric solutions for slide impact on pipelines.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (7): 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000314.
Randolph, M. F., and D. J. White. 2012. “Interaction forces between pipelines and submarine slides: A geotechnical viewpoint.” Ocean Eng. 48 (Jul): 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.03.014.
Sahdi, F., C. Gaudin, D. J. White, N. P. Boylan, and M. F. Randolph. 2014. “Centrifuge modelling of active slide–pipeline loading in soft clay.” Geotechnique 64 (1): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.191.
Shcapery, R. A., and W. A. Dunlap. 1978. “Prediction of storm-induced sea bottom movement and platform forces.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Spinewine, B., D. Rensonnet, T. De Thier, M. Clare, G. Unterseh, and H. Capart. 2013. “Numerical modeling of runout and velocity for slide-induced submarine density flows-a building block of integrated geohazards assessment for deepwater developments.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Towhata, I., and T. M. Al-Hussaini. 1988. “Lateral loads on offshore structures exerted by submarine mudflows.” Soils Found. 28 (3): 26–34. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.28.3_26.
Wieghardt, K. 1975. “Experiments in granular flow.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 7 (1): 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.07.010175.000513.
Yuan, F., L. Li, Z. Guo, and L. Wang. 2015. “Landslide impact on submarine pipelines: Analytical and numerical analysis.” J. Eng. Mech. 141 (2): 04014109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000826.
Yuan, F., L. Wang, Z. Guo, and R. Shi. 2012a. “A refined analytical model for landslide or debris flow impact on pipelines. I: Surface pipelines.” Appl. Ocean Res. 35 (Mar): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2011.12.001.
Yuan, F., L. Wang, Z. Guo, and Y. Xie. 2012b. “A refined analytical model for landslide or debris flow impact on pipelines. II: Embedded pipelines.” Appl. Ocean Res. 35 (Mar): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2011.12.002.
Zakeri, A. 2009. “Review of state-of-the-art: Drag forces on submarine pipelines and piles caused by landslide or debris flow impact.” J. Offshore Mech. Arct. 131 (1): 014001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2957922.
Zakeri, A., B. Hawlader, and K. Chi. 2012. “Drag forces caused by submarine glide block or out-runner block impact on suspended (free-span) pipelines.” Ocean Eng. 47 (Jun): 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.03.016.
Zakeri, A., K. Høeg, and F. Nadim. 2008. “Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines. I: Experimental investigation.” Coastal Eng. 55 (12): 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.06.003.
Zakeri, A., K. Høeg, and F. Nadim. 2009. “Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines. II: Numerical analysis.” Coastal Eng. 56 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2008.06.005.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10Issue 3August 2019

History

Received: Nov 7, 2017
Accepted: Dec 7, 2018
Published online: Apr 12, 2019
Published in print: Aug 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Sep 12, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Ocean Science and Engineering, Southern Univ. of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China; formerly, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jackson State Univ., Jackson, MS 39217. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2159-9430. Email: [email protected]
Himangshu S. Das, M.ASCE [email protected]
Subject Matter Expert, Engineering and Construction Division, USACE, Galveston, TX 77550 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share