Technical Papers
Feb 22, 2018

Development of a Sustainability Evaluation System for Culvert Replacement and Rehabilitation Projects

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 9, Issue 2

Abstract

As the number of deteriorated infrastructure assets, including culverts, continues to rise, there is a need to find the most cost-effective approaches to dealing with these assets. At the same time, there is a growing awareness that decisions cannot be made exclusively based on cost and that sustainability must also be considered. Although there exist a number of tools that allow environmental, societal, economic, and technical considerations to be assessed when evaluating alternatives for many infrastructure projects, there is no such tool for culverts. This paper describes the development of a culvert module for a commercially available assessment tool known as GoldSET. The environmental, societal, economic, and technical indicators used within the culvert module are introduced and described. The use of the tool is then demonstrated using two case studies that assess the viability of a traditional open-cut approach compared to trenchless approaches. For the two selected case studies, the trenchless approaches are found to be preferable except if considerations of technical uncertainties dominate the decision making.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for their financial support of this research.

References

Arnoult, J. D. (1986). Culvert inspection manual: Supplement to the bridge inspector’s training manual, Federal Highway Administration, Maclean, VA, 215.
Butler, D., Farmani, R., Fu, G., Ward, S., Diao, K., and Astaraie-Imani, M. (2014). “A new approach to urban water management: Safe and sure.” Procedia Eng., 89, 347–354.
CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) News. (2012). “Ottawa sinkhole reveals crumbling roads.” ⟨http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-sinkhole-reveals-crumbling-roads-1.1258128⟩ (Jul. 13, 2017).
CGBC (Canadian Green Building Council). (2016). “LEED: The international mark of excellence.” ⟨http://www.cagbc.org/CAGBC/LEED/CAGBC/Programs/LEED/Going_green_with_LEE.aspx?hkey=54c44792-442b-450a-a286-4aa710bf5c64⟩ (May 17, 2016).
CIRC (Canadian Infrastructure Report Card). (2016). “Informing the future: The Canadian infrastructure report card.” ⟨http://www.canadainfrastructure.ca/en/index.html⟩ (Feb. 23, 2016).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2016). “Welcome to INVEST Version 1.2!” ⟨https://www.sustainablehighways.org/⟩ (May 20, 2016).
Golder. (2016). “GoldSET.” ⟨https://golder.goldset.com/portal/default.aspx⟩ (Feb. 2, 2016).
Greendroads Foundation. (2016). “Greenroads home.” ⟨https://www.greenroads.org/⟩ (May 17, 2016).
ISI (Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure). (2017). “How it works.” ⟨http://sustainableinfrastructure.org/envision/how-it-works/⟩ (Jan. 21, 2017).
Koo, D. H., Ariaratnam, S. T., and Kavazanjian, E. (2009). “Development of a sustainability assessment model for underground infrastructure projects.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(5), 765–776.
Maher, M., Kazmierowski, T., and Navarra, M. (2015). “Integration of sustainability rating tools in contemporary pavement management systems.” 9th Int. Conf. on Managing Pavement Assets, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 14.
NYDOT (New York Department of Transportation). (2016). “GreenLITES: Recognizing leadership in transportation environmental sustainability.” ⟨https://www.dot.ny.gov/programs/greenlites⟩ (May 20, 2016).
Papajohn, D., Brinker, C., and El Asmar, M. (2016). “MARS: Metaframework for assessing ratings of sustainability for buildings and infrastructure.” J. Manage. Eng., 04016026.
Regier, C., Hoult, N. A., and Moore, I. D. (2017). “Laboratory study on the behavior of a horizontal-ellipse culvert during service and ultimate load testing.” J. Bridge Eng., 04016131.
Shen, L., Wu, Y., and Zhang, X. (2010). “Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 441–451.
Soderlund, M., Muench, S. T., Willoughby, K., Uhlmeyer, J., and Weston, J. (2008). “Green roads: A sustainability rating system for roadways.” Proc., 87 TRB Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 21.
Syachrani, S., Jeong, H. S. D., Rai, V., Chae, M. J., and Iseley, T. (2010). “A risk management approach to safety assessment of trenchless technologies for culvert rehabilitation.” Tunnelling Underground Space Techol., 25(6), 681–688.
Wyant, D. C. (2002). Assessment and rehabilitation of existing culverts: A synthesis of highway practice, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 75.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 9Issue 2May 2018

History

Received: Feb 7, 2017
Accepted: Oct 30, 2017
Published online: Feb 22, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 22, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jacob Tetreault [email protected]
Researcher, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen’s—RMC, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6. E-mail: [email protected]
Ian D. Moore, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Canada Research Chair in Infrastructure Engineering, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen’s—RMC, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6. E-mail: [email protected]
Neil A. Hoult, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Ellis Hall, Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Dicksen Tanzil [email protected]
Independent Consultant, Houston, TX 77401. E-mail: [email protected]
Michael L. J. Maher [email protected]
Principal, Golder Associates Ltd., 100 Scotia Ct., Whitby, ON, Canada L1N 8Y6. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share