Technical Papers
Dec 6, 2017

Impact of IR Drops on the 850  mVCSE Cathodic Protection Criterion for Coated Steel Pipes in Soil

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 9, Issue 1

Abstract

By means of numerical modeling and experimental measurements, this work addresses the longstanding controversy of whether or not IR (ohmic) drops need to be considered in on-potential cathodic protection criteria. The results suggest that the IR drop is of little importance in many situations of practical relevance, and that its adverse influence on assessing the effectiveness of corrosion protection is generally overrated. This suggests that on-potentials are in principle suitable to be directly used for determining if a cathodic protection (CP) system offers adequate corrosion protection. This is considered a relevant finding because on-potentials are straightforward to measure, and their interpretation is free of many of the difficulties associated with instant-off potentials. Irrespective of the parameter used, however, a number of issues are discussed that need to be addressed in further work in order to provide the knowledge required to settle on threshold values.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Angst, U., et al. (2016). “Cathodic protection of soil buried steel pipelines–A critical discussion of protection criteria and threshold values.” Mater. Corros., 67(11), 1135–1142.
Angst, U., Vennesland, Ø., and Myrdal, R. (2009). “Diffusion potentials as source of error in electrochemical measurements in concrete.” Mater. Struct., 42(3), 365–375.
Barlo, T. J., and Fessler, R. R. (1983). “Interpretation of true pipe-to-soil potentials on coated pipelines with holidays.” Proc., CORROSION/83, NACE, Houston.
Bash, L. A. R. (2006). “Robert J. Kuhn’s 0.850V, CSE, cathodic protection criterion for buried coated steel pipelines is scientifically sound.” Proc., CORROSION 2006, NACE, Houston.
Bash, L. A. R. (2008). “Pipe-to-soil potential measurements, the basic science.” Proc., CORROSION 2008, NACE, Houston.
Büchler, M. (2010). “Cathodic corrosion protection: Discussion of fundamental mechanisms and their effects on limits.” 3R Int., 49(6–7), 342–347 (in German).
Büchler, M. (2015). “A new perspective on cathodic protection criteria promotes discussion.” Mater. Perf., 54(1), 44–48.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2001). “Cathodic protection of buried or immersed metallic structures.” EN 12954, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2003). “Cathodic protection measurement techniques.” EN 13509, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2005). “Cathodic protection of complex structures.” EN 14505, Brussels, Belgium.
COMSOL version 5.0 [Computer software]. COMSOL, Inc., Burlington, MA.
Freiman, L. I., and Kuznetsova, E. G. (2001). “Model investigation of the peculiarities of the corrosion and cathodic protection of steel in the insulation defects on underground steel pipelines.” Prot. Met., 37(5), 484–490.
Freiman, L. I., Strizhevskii, I. V., and Yunovich, M. Y. (1988). “Passivation of iron in soil with cathodic protection.” Prot. Met., 24, 78–80.
Funk, D., Hildebrand, H., Prinz, W., and Schwenk, W. (1987). “Korrosion und kathodischer Korrosionsschutz von unlegiertem Stahl in Sandböden.” Mater. Corros., 38(12), 719–724 (in German).
Gummow, R. A. B. (2010). “Examining the controversy surrounding the 850  mV CP criteria.” Pipeline Gas Journal, Nov. 85–87.
Gummow, R. A. B., Fieltsch, W., and Segall, S. M. (2012). “Would the real 850  mV CSE criterion please stand up.” Proc., CORROSION 2012, Salt Lake City.
Isgor, O. B., and Razaqpur, A. G. (2006). “Modelling steel corrosion in concrete structures.” Mater. Struct., 39(3), 291–302.
ISO. (2015). “Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries—Cathodic protection of pipeline systems. 1: On-land pipelines.” ISO 15589-1:2015, Geneva.
Kajiyama, F., and Okamura, K. (1999). “Evaluating cathodic protection reliability on steel pipe in microbially active soils.” Corrosion, 55(1), 74–80.
Kasahara, K., Sato, T., and Adachi, H. (1980). “Results of polarization potential and current density surveys of existing buried pipelines.” Mater. Perf., 19(9), 45–51.
Käsche, H. (2003). Corrosion of metals—Physicochemical principles and current problems, Springer, Berlin.
Kobayashi, T. (1974). “Effect of environmental factors on the protective potential of steel.” Proc., 5th Int. Congress on Metallic Corrosion, NACE, Houston, 627–630.
Kuhn, R. J. (1928). “Galvanic current on cast iron pipes—Their causes and effects, methods of measuring and means of prevention.” Proc., 1st Soil Corrosion Conf., Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
Kuhn, R. J. (1958). “The early history of cathodic protection in the United States—Some recollections.” Corros. Prev. Control, 5, 46.
Leeds, J. M. (1992). “Cathodic-generated film protects pipe surface—1.” Pipeline Ind., 4, 39–45.
Leeds, S. S. (2007). “Influence of surface films on cathodic protection.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
Martin, B. A. (1981). “Cathodic protection: The ohmic component of potential measurement—Laboratory determinations with a polarization probe in aqueous environments.” Mater. Perf., 52–57.
McCafferty, E. (2010). Introduction to corrosion science, Springer, New York.
Msallamová, Š., Novák, P., and Kouřil, M. (2015). “Influence of cathodic protection on pH and change of soil electrolyte composition.” 24th Int. Conf. on Metallurgy and Materials, Brno, Czech Republic.
Munn, R. S., and Devereux, O. F. (1991). “Numerical modeling and solution of galvanic corrosion systems. 1: Governing differential-equations and electrodic boundary conditions.” Corrosion, 47(8), 612–618.
NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers). (2013). “Control of external corrosion on underground or submerged metallic piping systems.” SP0169-2013, Houston.
Norsworthy, R. (2010). “Revising CP criteria requires careful consideration.” Oil Gas J., 108, 134–139.
Ondak, E. J., and Rizzo, F. E. (2008). “Electrochemical analysis of pipeline CP criteria.” Proc., CORROSION 2008, New Orleans.
Parker, V. B., and Khodakovskii, I. L. (1995). “Thermodynamic properties of the aqueous ions (2+ and 3+) of iron and the key compounds of iron.” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 24(5), 1699–1745.
Poel, L. W. (1960). “The estimation of oxygen diffusion rates in soils.” J. Ecol., 48(1), 165–173.
Pourbaix, M. (1974). Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions, NACE, Houston.
Reynolds, J. M. (2011). An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics, 2nd Ed., Wiley, Oxford, U.K.
Schwerdtfeger, W. J., and McDorman, O. N. (1951). “Potential and current requirements for the cathodic protection of steels in soil.” J. Res. Natl. Bureau Stand., 47(2), 104–112.
Song, F. M., and Yu, H. (2011). “Review of CP criteria in five standards.” Pipeline Gas Journal, Dec.
Thompson, N. G., and Barlo, T. J. (1983). “Fundamental processes of cathodically protecting steel pipelines.” Proc., Int. Gas Research Conf., London, 274–284.
Trimble, W. L. (2010). “What’s right with ‘850 On’, what’s wrong with ‘850 Polarized’, & how we can improve them both.” Proc., CORROSION 2010, NACE, Houston.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 9Issue 1February 2018

History

Received: Jun 27, 2016
Accepted: Aug 14, 2017
Published online: Dec 6, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 6, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Institute for Building Materials, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-4757. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
M. Büchler, Ph.D.
Director, Swiss Society for Corrosion Protection, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zurich, Switzerland.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share