Technical Papers
May 19, 2016

Underground Utility Locating Technologies for Condition Assessment and Renewal Engineering of Water Pipeline Infrastructure Systems

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 7, Issue 4

Abstract

Underground asset locating practices use new and existing technologies to accurately identify, characterize, and map buried utilities through the integration of professional utility records, visual site inspection, geophysical techniques, survey, and utility exposure. The efficient use of locating practices allows effective condition assessment and renewal engineering applications, which, in turn, improves asset management practices for water utilities. Utility engineers, managers, and practitioners need to be familiar with all locating technologies (working principles, capabilities, and limitations) to have an effective selection of the appropriate technologies for every scenario. There are capabilities and limitations of all existing underground utility locating technologies that are used by water utilities. This paper provides the factors affecting the reliability of underground pipe locating surveys and presents an overview of the capabilities and limitations of the locating technologies to guide water pipeline infrastructure practitioners through literature. Application of underground utility locating technologies by water and wastewater utilities was investigated through case studies and phone interviews. Recommendations on ways to improve locating technology applications for water and wastewater utilities were made based on the literature and practice review.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The development of WATERiD is funded by the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) under the contract INFR9SG09 and INFR10SG09 through the USEPA’s Aging Water Infrastructure Research Program, and stems from the USEPA’s Sustainable Water Infrastructure Initiative. The authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation (NSF) for the partial funding under the grant NSF-CMMI-0801018,and for the support of the Sustainable Water Infrastructure Management (SWIM) Center of Excellence in the Institute of Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech. Special thanks is given to the representatives of various drinking water and wastewater utilities that provided valuable feedback and comments. The authors also would like to thank Mr. Yeun J. Jung for the research work he has conducted that led the way for this study.

References

Anderson, D. N., Cardimona, S., and Newton, T., (2003). “Application of innovative non-destructive methods to geotechnical and environmental investigation.” Missouri Dept. of Transportation, Research, Development and Technology.
ASCE. (2002). “Standard guideline for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data.” Reston, VA.
ASCE. (2016). “Civil engineering database.” 〈〉 (Mar. 27, 2016).
Atef, A., and Moselhi, O. (2014). “Modeling spatial and functional interdependencies of civil infrastructure networks.” Proc., Pipelines 2014, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1558–1567.
Bernold, L. E., Venkatesan, L., and Suvarna, S. (2002). “A multi-sensory approach to 3-D mapping of underground utilities.” 19th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 525–530.
Boniger, U., and Tronicke, J. (2012). “Subsurface utility extraction and characterization: combining GPR symmetry and polarization attributes.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 50(3), 736–746.
Cano-Hurtado, J., and Canto-Perello, J. (1999). “Sustainable development of urban underground space for utilities.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 14(3), 335–340.
Canto-Perello, J., and Curiel-Esparza, J. (2013). “Assessing governance issues of urban utility tunnels.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 33, 82–87.
Chapman, D. N., Rogers, C. D. F., Burd, H. J., Norris, P. M., and Milligan, G. W. E. (2007). “Research needs for new construction using trenchless technologies.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 22(5–6), 491–502.
Compendex. (2016). “Engineering information the home of engineering village.” 〈〉 (Mar. 27, 2016).
Conant, J., and Jones, C. (2012). “Locating water main leaks in Texas to conserve resources during times of drought.” Pipelines 2012, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1319–1327.
Costello, S. B., Chapman, D. N., Rogers, C. D. F., and Metje, N. (2007). “Underground asset location and condition assessment technologies.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 22(5–6), 524–542.
Curiel-Esparza, J., and Canto-Perello, J. (2013). “Selecting utilities placement techniques in urban underground engineering.” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 13(2), 276–285.
Davis, P., Sullivan, E., Marlow, D., and Marney, D. (2013). “A selection framework for infrastructure condition monitoring technologies in water and wastewater networks.” Exp. Syst. Appl., 40(6), 1947–1958.
Dziadak, K., Kumar, B., and Sommerville, J. (2009). “Model for the 3D location of buried assets based on RFID technology.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 148–159.
Elsawah, H., Guerrero, M., and Moselhi, O. (2014). “Decision support model for integrated intervention plans of municipal infrastructure.” Int. Conf. on Sustainable Infrastructure, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1039–1050.
Goodrum, P., Smith, A., Slaughter, B., and Kari, F. (2008). “Case study and statistical analysis of utility conflicts on construction roadway projects and best practices in their avoidance.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 63–70.
Google. (2016). “About google scholar.” 〈〉 (Mar. 27, 2016).
Grigg, N. S. (2006). “Condition assessment of water distribution pipes.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 147–153.
Hafskjold, L. S. (2010). “Coordination of rehabilitation planning and measures co-infrastructure interactions.”, SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, Trondheim, Norway.
Halfawy, M. (2008). “Integration of municipal infrastructure asset management processes: Challenges and solutions.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 216–229.
Hao, T., et al. (2012). “Condition assessment of the buried utility service infrastructure.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 28, 331–344.
HDD Consortium. (2008). Horizontal directional drilling—Good practices guidelines, 3rd Ed.
Hutchins, L., and Sinha, S. (2009). “Identifying appropriate means and methods for locating buried utilities.” Pipelines 2009, ASCE, Reston, VA, 394–403.
Jaw, S. W., and Hashim, M. (2013). “Locational accuracy of underground utility mapping using ground penetrating radar.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 35, 20–29.
Jensen, W., Wirth, D., and Lowder, H. (2013). “The damage prevention partnering process.” Damage Prevention Professional, Infrastructure Resources LLC, Bloomington, MN, 40–42.
Jeong, H., Abraham, D., and Lew, J. (2004). “Evaluation of an emerging market in subsurface utility engineering.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 225–234.
Jeong, H. S., and Abraham, D. M. (2004). “A decision tool for the selection of imaging technologies to detect underground infrastructure.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 19(2), 175–191.
Jung, Y. J. (2009). “Utility impact rating with subsurface utility engineering in project development.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(11), 1744–1754.
Jung, Y. J. (2012). “Evaluation of subsurface utility engineering for highway projects: Benefit-cost analysis.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 27(1), 111–122.
Kraus, E., Quiroga, C., Scott, P., Swafford, T., Meis, P., and Monday, G. (2013). “Innovations in the use of utility conflict matrices to optimize project development and delivery.” Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Lanka, M., Butler, A., and Sterling, R. (2001). “Use of approximate reasoning techniques for locating underground utilities.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 16(1), 13–31.
Lew, J. (2000). “Cost savings on highway projects utilizing subsurface utility engineering.” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Liu, Z., and Kleiner, Y. (2013). “State of the art review of inspection technologies for condition assessment of water pipes.” Measurement, 46(1), 1–15.
Metje, N., et al. (2007). “Mapping the underworld—State-of-the-art review.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 22(5–6), 568–586.
North, D. (2010). “Marking the spot RFID markers and GPS technology support Virginia DOT roadway construction.” CE News, Zweig Group, Fayetteville, AR, 38–40.
Osman, H., and El-Diraby, T. E. (2005). “Subsurface utility engineering in Ontario: Challenges and opportunities.”, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
Rogers, C. D., Zembillas, N. M., Thomas, A. M., Metje, N., and Chapman, D. N. (2008).“Mapping the underworld: Enhancing subsurface utility engineering performance.” Proc., Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Rogers, C. D. F., et al. (2012a). “Condition assessment of the surface and buried infrastructure—A proposal for integration.” Tunnell. Underground Space Technol., 28, 202–211.
Rogers, C. D. F., et al. (2012b). “Mapping the underworld.” Univ. of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
Royal, A. C. D., et al. (2011). “Site assessment of multiple-sensor approaches for buried utility detection.” Int. J. Geophys., 19.
Sinha, S., and Graf, W. (2012). “Design and development of a web-based national database for water and wastewater pipeline infrastructure systems.” Pipelines 2012, ASCE, Reston, VA, 28–37.
Sinha, S. K., Thomas, H. R., Wang, M. C., and Jung, Y. J. (2007). “Subsurface utility engineering manual.”, Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, PA.
Steiner, K., Sinha, S., Whittle, G., and Graf, W. (2011). “Development of a national web-based interactive database of renewal technologies for water and wastewater pipelines.” Proc. Water Environ. Fed., 2011(5), 282–296.
Sterling, R., et al. (2009). “Encouraging innovation in locating and characterizing underground utilities.”, Washington, DC.
Sterling, R., et al. (2012). “Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas.” Proc. ICE-Urban Des. Plann., 165(4), 241–254.
Sterling, R. L. (2000). “Utility locating technologies: A summary of responses to a statement of need distributed by the federal laboratory consortium for technology transfer.” Federal Laboratory Consortium, Washington, DC.
Talmaki, S., Dong, S., and Kamat, V. (2010). “Geospatial databases and augmented reality visualization for improving safety in urban excavation operations.” Proc., Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 91–101.
Technos Inc. (2004). “Surface geophysical methods.” 〈http://www.technosinc.com/pdf/SurfaceTechnotes.pdf〉 (Jun. 10, 2011).
Thelin, K., Bugingo, F., and Giesy, A. (2011). “Applying subsurface utility engineering (SUE) to transportation projects: The state of the practice.” Pipelines 2011, ASCE, Reston, VA, 735–743.
Thomas, H. R., Ellis, R. D., and Sinha, S. K. (2006). “Improving the time performance of highway construction contracts.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Thuruthy, N., et al. (2013a). “Condition assessment for drinking water pipelines.” Water Environmental Research Foundation, Alexandria VA.
Thuruthy, N., et al. (2013b). “Condition assessment of wastewater pipelines.” Water Environmental Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA.
U.S. EPA. (2004). “EPA regions.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/homelandsecurityportal/where-you-live.htm〉 (Aug. 11, 2014).
Uslu, B., Sinha, S. K., Anspach, J. H., Scott, P., Herron, J., and Suchodolski, W. T. (2014). “Underground utility locating synthesis report.” Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Alexandria, VA.
Wahab, S. W., Chapman, D. N., Rogers, C. D. F., Foo, K. Y., Nawawi, S. W., and Abas, K. H. (2015). “Assessing the condition of buried pipe using ground-penetrating radar (GPR).” The Malaysia-Japan Model on Technology Partnership: Int. Proc. 2013 of Malaysia-Japan Academic Scholar Conf., Springer, Tokyo, 311–319.
Water Infrastructure Database. (2016). “Water infrastructure database, sustainable water infrastructure management.” 〈〉 (Mar. 27, 2016).
Wightman, W. E., Jalinoos, F., Sirles, P., and Hanna, K. (2003). “Application of geophysical methods to highway related problems.” Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Lakewood, CO.
Young, G. N., and Kennedy, C. M. (2013). “Utility locating technology development using multisensor platforms.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 7Issue 4November 2016

History

Received: Aug 28, 2014
Accepted: Sep 11, 2015
Published online: May 19, 2016
Discussion open until: Oct 19, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Berk Uslu, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Yeun J. Jung [email protected]
Korean Land Spatialization Group, Well County 119/504, Sondodong, Yeunsugu, Incheon 406-841, South Korea. E-mail: [email protected]
Sunil K. Sinha [email protected]
Professor and Director, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Room No.117C, Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share